New Data and Methods for Modelling Future Urban Travel Demand: A State of the Art Review

Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 54)


This paper aims is to provide an overview of how new data collection methods and the various advances in urban travel demand modelling are improving the understanding of mobility. These new modelling applications and data allow for a study of both new disruptive transport services and changes in travel behaviours in the “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS) context that needs to be overcome in the future.


Travel demand modelling State of the art Review Urban mobility New data sources Future mobility 


  1. 1.
    Aditjandra PT, Cao XJ, Mulley C (2012) Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(1):22–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agatz N, Erera AL, Savelsbergh MWP, Wang X (2011) Dynamic ride-sharing: a simulation study in metro Atlanta. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 17:532–550Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anda C, Erath A, Fourie PJ (2017) Transport modelling in the age of big data. Int J Urban Sci 21(sup1):19–42Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arentze T, Hofman F, van Mourik H, Timmermans H (2000) ALBATROSS: multiagent, rule-based model of activity pattern decisions. Transp Res Rec 1706(1):136–144Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auld J, Mohammadian AK (2012) Activity planning processes in the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(8):1386–1403Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahamonde-Birke FJ, Kunert U, Link H, de Dios Ortúzar J (2017) About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models. Transportation 44(3):475–493Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bao Q, Kochan B, Bellemans T, Janssens D, Wets G (2015) Investigating micro-simulation error in activity-based travel demand forecasting: a case study of the FEATHERS framework. Transp Plan Technol 38(4):425–441Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bao Q, Kochan B, Shen Y, Bellemans T, Janssens D, Wets G (2016) Activity-based travel demand modeling framework FEATHERS: sensitivity analysis with decision trees. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 89–99Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bekhor S, Dobler C, Axhausen KW (2010) Integration of activity-based with agent-based models: an example from the tel aviv model and MATSim. Arb Verk Raumplan 628Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bekhor S, Kheifits L, Sorani, M (2014) Stability analysis of activity-based models: case study of the Tel Aviv transportation model. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 14(4)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions. Handbook of transportation science. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–33Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ben-Akiva M, Walker J, Bernardino AT, Gopinath DA, Morikawa T, Polydoropoulou A (2002) Integration of choice and latent variable models. Perpetual motion, travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges, pp 431–470Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berrada J, Leurent F (2017) Modeling transportation systems involving autonomous vehicles: a state of the art. Transp Res Procedia 27:215–221Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bischoff J, Nagel K (2017) Integrating explicit parking search into a transport simulation. Procedia Comput Sci 109:881–886Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bohte W, Maat K (2009) Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: a large-scale application in the Netherlands. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 17(3):285–297Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bowman JL, Ben-Akiva ME (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 35(1):1–28Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bricka SG, Sen S, Paleti R, Bhat CR (2012) An analysis of the factors influencing differences in survey-reported and GPS-recorded trips. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 21(1):67–88Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Calabrese F, Diao M, Di Lorenzo G, Ferreira J Jr, Ratti C (2013) Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: a mobile phone trace example. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 26:301–313Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calabrese F, Ferrari L, Blondel Vincent D (2015) Urban sensing using mobile phone network data: a survey of research. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 47(2):25Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carreira R, Patrício L, Jorge RN, Magee C (2014) Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider-a quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transp Policy 31:35–46Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Castiglione J, Freedman J, Bradley M (2003) Systematic investigation of variability due to random simulation error in an activity-based microsimulation forecasting model. Transp Res Rec 1831(1):76–88Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Castiglione J, Bradley M, Gliebe J (2015) Activity-based travel demand models: a primerGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen C, Ma J, Susilo Y, Liu Y, Wang M (2016) The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 68:285–299Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chorus CG, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2008) A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 42(1):1–18Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cich G, Knapen L, Maciejewski M, Bellemans T, Janssens D et al (2017) Modeling demand responsive transport using SARL and MATSim. Procedia Comput Sci 109:1074–1079Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis B, Dutzik T, Baxandall P (2012) Transportation and the new generation. Why young people are driving less and what it means for transportation policy. Frontier GroupGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    de Barcelona A (2013). Pla de Mobilitat Urbana de Barcelona 2013–2018Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Dios Ortuzar J, Willumsen, LG (2011) Modal split and direct demand models. Modelling transport, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 207–225Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Oña J, De Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp Policy 29:219–226Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Delbosc A, Currie G (2015) Does information and communication technology complement or replace social travel among young adults? Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 76–82Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diana M, Mokhtarian PL (2009) Grouping travelers on the basis of their different car and transit levels of use. Transportation 36(4):455–467Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Djavadian S, Chow JYJ (2017) An agent-based day-to-day adjustment process for modeling mobility as a service with a two-sided flexible transport market. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 104:36–57Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Du Y, Zhao C, Zhang X, Sun L (2015) Microscopic simulation evaluation method on access traffic operation. Simul Model Pract Theory 53:139–148Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    e Silva JDA, Morency C, Goulias KG (2012) Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 46(8):1252–1264Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. J Public Transp 10(3):2Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2010) How to capture the passengers’ point of view on a transit service through rating and choice options. Transp Rev 30(4):435–450Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 40:1–13Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Feng T, Timmermans HJP (2014) Extracting activity-travel diaries from GPS data: towards integrated semi-automatic imputation. Procedia Environ Sci 22:178–185Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fifer S, Rose J, Greaves S (2014) Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it? Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 61:164–177Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Furuhata M, Dessouky M, Ordóñez F, Brunet M-E, Wang X, Koenig S (2013) Ridesharing: the state-of-the-art and future directions. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 57:28–46Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Garikapati VM, Pendyala RM, Morris EA, Mokhtarian PL, McDonald N (2016) Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: a generation in transition? Transp Rev 36(5):558–584Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ghasri M, Rashidi TH, Waller ST (2017) Developing a disaggregate travel demand system of models using data mining techniques. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 105:138–153Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Giesecke R, Surakka T, Hakonen M (2016) Conceptualising mobility as a service. In: 2016 11th international conference on ecological vehicles and renewable energies (EVER). IEEE, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Group, Resource Systems (2012) The ARC and SACOG experience with activity-based models: synthesis and lessons learned. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guiliano G, Hayden SA (2005) Marketing public transport. Handbooks in transport, vol 6Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gundlegård D, Rydergren C, Breyer N, Rajna B (2016) Travel demand estimation and network assignment based on cellular network data. Comput Commun 95:29–42Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Habib KMN (2011) A random utility maximization (RUM) based dynamic activity scheduling model: application in weekend activity scheduling. Transportation 38(1):123–151Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV (2014) Urban activity pattern classification using topic models from online geo-location data. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 44:363–381Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    He Q, Head KL, Ding J (2014) Multi-modal traffic signal control with priority, signal actuation and coordination. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 46:65–82Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Heilig M, Mallig N, Schröder O, Kagerbauer M, Vortisch P (2018) Implementation of free-floating and station-based carsharing in an agent-based travel demand model. Travel Behav Soc 12:151–158Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Huang A, Gallegos L, Lerman K (2017) Travel analytics: understanding how destination choice and business clusters are connected based on social media data. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 77:245–256Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ingvardson JB, Kaplan S, Nielsen OA, Di Ciommo F, de Abreu e Silva J, Shiftan Y (2017) The Commuting habit loop: the role of satisfying existence, relatedness, and growth needs in modal choice. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Injadat M, Salo F, Nassif AB (2016) Data mining techniques in social media: a survey. Neurocomputing 214:654–670Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Johansson MV, Heldt T, Johansson P (2006) The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 40(6):507–525Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jurdak R, Zhao K, Liu J, AbouJaoude M, Cameron M, Newth D (2015) Understanding human mobility from Twitter. PloS One 10(7):e0131469Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kamargianni M, Polydoropoulou A (2014) Generation Y’s travel behavior and perceptions of walkability constraints. Transp Res Rec 2430(1):59–71Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kamargianni M, Li W, Matyas M, Schäfer A (2016) A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp Res Procedia 14:3294–3303Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kaplan S, e Silva JDA, Di Ciommo F (2014) The relationship between young people’ s transit use and their perceptions of equity concepts in transit service provision. Transp Policy 36:79–87Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kelen C, Vilarino P, Christou G (2017) Advanced demand data collection technologies for multi modal strategic modelling. Transp Res Procedia 27:1058–1065Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Koppelman FS, Bhat C (2006) A self instructing course in mode choice modeling: multinomial and nested logit modelsGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kroesen M, Handy SL (2015) Is the rise of the e-society responsible for the decline in car use by young adults? Results from the Netherlands. Transp Res Rec 2496(1):28–35Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kuflik T, Minkov E, Nocera S, Grant-Muller S, Gal-Tzur A, Shoor I (2017) Automating a framework to extract and analyse transport related social media content: the potential and the challenges. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 77:275–291Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kuhnimhof T, Buehler R, Dargay J (2011) A new generation: travel trends for young Germans and Britons. Transp Res Rec 2230(1):58–67Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Li Q, Liao F, Timmermans HJP, Huang H, Zhou J (2018) Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: a demand-side model. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 107:102–123Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Linares MP, Barceló J, Carmona C, Montero L (2017) Analysis and operational challenges of dynamic ride sharing demand responsive transportation models. Transp Res Procedia 21:110–129Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mans J, Interrante E, Lem L, Mueller J, Lawrence M (2012) Next generation of travel behavior: potential impacts related to household use of information and communication technology. Transp Res Rec 2323(1):90–98Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Matyas MB, Kamargianni M (2017) A holistic overview of the mobility-as-a-service. In: Hungarian transport research conferenceGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    McNally MG (2000) The activity-based approachPergamon. In: Hensher DA, Button K (eds) Hand Book of Transport ModellingGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Miller EJ (2017) Modeling the demand for new transportation services and technologies. Transp Res Rec 2658(1):1–7Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nourinejad M, Roorda MJ (2016) Agent based model for dynamic ridesharing. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 64:117–132Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, Shiwakoti N (2014) Social media use during unplanned transit network disruptions: a review of literature. Transp Rev 34(4):501–521Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Petrik O, Adnan M, Basak K, Ben-Akiva M (2018) Uncertainty analysis of an activity-based microsimulation model for Singapore. Future Gener Comput SystGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pournarakis DE, Sotiropoulos DN, Giaglis GM (2017) A computational model for mining consumer perceptions in social media. Decis Support Syst 93:98–110Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rashidi TH, Abbasi A, Maghrebi M, Hasan S, Waller TS (2017) Exploring the capacity of social media data for modelling travel behaviour: opportunities and challenges. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 75:197–211Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rasouli S (2016) Uncertainty in modeling activity-travel demand in complex urban systems. TRAIL Research SchoolGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ribeiro MD, Larrañaga AM, Arellana J, Cybis HBB (2014) Influence of GPS and self-reported data in travel demand models. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 162:467–476Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Saleem M, Västberg OB, Karlström A (2018) An activity based demand model for large scale simulations. Procedia Comput Sci 130:920–925Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shiftan Y, Ben-Akiva M (2011) A practical policy-sensitive, activity-based, travel-demand model. Ann Reg Sci 47(3):517–541Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Shiftan Y, Outwater ML, Zhou Y (2008) Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transp Policy 15(3):186–195Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Shiftan Y, Barlach Y, Shefer D (2015) Measuring passenger loyalty to public transport modes. J Public Transp 18(1):7Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Şimşekoğlu Ö, Nordfjærn T, Rundmo T (2015) The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transp Policy 42:113–120Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sivakumar A (2007) Modelling transport: a synthesis of transport modelling methodologies. Imperial College of LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Stathopoulos A, Cirillo C, Cherchi E, Ben-Elia E, Li Y-T, Schmöcker J-D (2017) Innovation adoption modeling in transportation: new models and data. J Choice ModelGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Stock K (2018) Mining location from social media: a systematic review. Comput Environ Urban SystGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Tan W, Chai Y, Wang W, Liu Y (2012) General modeling and simulation for enterprise operational decision-making problem: a policy-combination perspective. Simul Model Pract Theory 21(1):1–20Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tyrinopoulos Y, Aifadopoulou G (2008) A complete methodology for the quality control of passenger services in the public transport business. Eur Transp 38(38):1–16Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Van Acker V, Mokhtarian PL, Witlox F (2014) Car availability explained by the structural relationships between lifestyles, residential location, and underlying residential and travel attitudes. Transp Policy 35:88–99Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A (2016) Enjoying loyalty: the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res Transp Econ 59:50–59Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Van Wee B (2002) Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. J Transp Geogr 10(4):259–271Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Veldhuisen J, Timmermans H, Kapoen L (2000) Microsimulation model of activity-travel patterns and traffic flows: specification, validation tests, and Monte Carlo error. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 126–135Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wang Y, Szeto WY, Han K, Friesz TL (2018) Dynamic traffic assignment: a review of the methodological advances for environmentally sustainable road transportation applications. Transp Res Part B: MethodolGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Wegener M (2013) The future of mobility in cities: challenges for urban modelling. Transp Policy 29:275–282Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wismans L, De Romph E, Friso K, Zantema K (2014) Real time traffic models, decision support for traffic management. Procedia Environ Sci 22:220–235Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Xiong Y, Zhang J (2016) Effects of land use and transport on young adults’ quality of life. Travel Behav Soc 5:37–47Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ye R, Titheridge H (2017) Satisfaction with the commute: the role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 52:535–547Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhang J, Chikaraishi M, Xiong Y, Jiang Y, Seya H (2016) Young people’s life choices and travel behavior: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. In: A discussion paper for the workshop ‘Young People’s Life Choices and Travel...’Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zheng H, Son Y-J, Chiu Y-C, Head L, Feng Y, Xi H, Kim S, Hickman M, et al (2013) A primer for agent-based simulation and modeling in transportation applications. Technical report, United States, Federal Highway AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Zhuge C, Shao C, Wang S, Hu Y (2019) Sensitivity analysis of integrated activity-based model: using MATSim as an example. Transp Lett 11(2):93–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Campus Nord UPC Jordi Girona, 1-3 Building C-3BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.CIMNE Castelldefels Edifici C3 Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnología UPC C/ Esteve Terrades no 5CastelldefelsSpain
  3. 3.CENIT, Barcelona, c/Jordi Girona s/n Campus Nord UPC, Edifici C1BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations