Advertisement

Studying Public Medical Images from the Open Access Literature and Social Networks for Model Training and Knowledge Extraction

  • Henning MüllerEmail author
  • Vincent Andrearczyk
  • Oscar Jimenez del Toro
  • Anjani Dhrangadhariya
  • Roger Schaer
  • Manfredo Atzori
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11962)

Abstract

Medical imaging research has long suffered problems getting access to large collections of images due to privacy constraints and to high costs that annotating images by physicians causes. With public scientific challenges and funding agencies fostering data sharing, repositories, particularly on cancer research in the US, are becoming available. Still, data and annotations are most often available on narrow domains and specific tasks. The medical literature (particularly articles contained in MedLine) has been used for research for many years as it contains a large amount of medical knowledge. Most analyses have focused on text, for example creating semi-automated systematic reviews, aggregating content on specific genes and their functions, or allowing for information retrieval to access specific content. The amount of research on images from the medical literature has been more limited, as MedLine abstracts are available publicly but no images are included. With PubMed Central, all the biomedical open access literature has become accessible for analysis, with images and text in structured format. This makes the use of such data easier than extracting it from PDF. This article reviews existing work on analyzing images from the biomedical literature and develops ideas on how such images can become useful and usable for a variety of tasks, including finding visual evidence for rare or unusual cases. These resources offer possibilities to train machine learning tools, increasing the diversity of available data and thus possibly the robustness of the classifiers. Examples with histopathology data available on Twitter already show promising possibilities. This article adds links to other sources that are accessible, for example via the ImageCLEF challenges.

Keywords

Medical imaging Biomedical literature Machine learning Training 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partially funded by the EU H2020 ExaMode project (grant agreement 825292).

References

  1. 1.
    Andrearczyk, V., Depeursinge, A., Müller, H.: Neural network training for cross-protocol radiomic feature standardization in computed tomography. J. Med. Imaging 6(2), 024008 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrearczyk, V., Müller, H.: Deep multimodal classification of image types in biomedical journal figures. In: Bellot, P., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2018. LNCS, vol. 11018, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apostolova, E., You, D., Xue, Z., Antani, S., Demner-Fushman, D., Thoma, G.R.: Image retrieval from scientific publications: text and image content processing to separate multi-panel figures. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 64, 893–908 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bejnordi, B.E., et al.: Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 318(22), 2199–2210 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, B., Stanley, R.J., De, S., Antani, S., Thoma, G.R.: Automatic detection of arrow annotation overlays in biomedical images. Int. J. Healthcare Inf. Syst. Inform. 6(4), 23–41 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chhatkuli, A., Markonis, D., Foncubierta-Rodríguez, A., Meriaudeau, F., Müller, H.: Separating compound figures in journal articles to allow for subfigure classification. In: SPIE Medical Imaging (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cruz-Roa, A., et al.: Accurate and reproducible invasive breast cancer detection in whole-slide images: a deep learning approach for quantifying tumor extent. Sci. Rep. 7, 46450 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demner-Fushman, D., Antani, S., Simpson, M.S., Thoma, G.R.: Design and development of a multimodal biomedical information retrieval system. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 6(2), 168–177 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2009, pp. 248–255 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Depeursinge, A., Müller, H.: Sensors, medical images and signal processing: comprehensive multi-modal diagnosis aid frameworks. In: IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–46 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deselaers, T., Deserno, T.M., Müller, H.: Automatic medical image annotation in ImageCLEF 2007: overview, results, and discussion. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29(15), 1988–1995 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dhrangadhariya, A.K., Jimenez-del Toro, O., Andrearczyk, V., Atzori, M., Müller, H.: Exploiting the PubMed central repository to mine out a large multimodal dataset of rare cancer studies. In: SPIE International Society for Optics and Photonics (2020)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emanuel, E.: A half-life of 5 years. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 112(5), 572 (1975)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graziani, M., Andrearczyk, V., Müller, H.: Regression concept vectors for bidirectional explanations in histopathology. In: Stoyanov, D., et al. (eds.) MLCN/DLF/IMIMIC -2018. LNCS, vol. 11038, pp. 124–132. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02628-8_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Müller, H.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2013 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum), September 2013Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    García Seco de Herrera, A., Müller, H., Bromuri, S.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2015 medical classification task. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2015 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum), September 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    García Seco de Herrera, A., Schaer, R., Bromuri, S., Müller, H.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2016 medical task. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2016 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum), September 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jimenez-del-Toro, O., et al.: Cloud-based evaluation of anatomical structure segmentation and landmark detection algorithms: VISCERAL Anatomy benchmarks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(11), 2459–2475 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kahn Jr., C.E., Thao, C.: GoldMiner: a radiology image search engine. Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1475–1478 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, J., García Seco de Herrera, A., Demner-Fushman, D., Antani, S., Bedrick, S., Müller, H.: Evaluating performance of biomedical image retrieval systems: overview of the medical image retrieval task at ImageCLEF 2004–2014. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 39, 55–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalpathy-Cramera, J., Hersh, W.: Automatic image modality based classification and annotation to improve medical image retrieval. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 129, 1334–1338 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lehmann, T.M., Schubert, H., Keysers, D., Kohnen, M., Wein, B.B.: The IRMA code for unique classification of medical images. In: Huang, H.K., Ratib, O.M. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2003: PACS and Integrated Medical Information Systems: Design and Evaluation. SPIEProc, vol. 5033, pp. 440–451. San Diego, California, USA (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leo, P., Lee, G., Shih, N.N.C., Elliott, R., Feldman, M.D., Madabhushi, A.: Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images. J. Med. Imaging 3(4), 047502 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, X., Plataniotis, K.N.: A complete color normalization approach to histopathology images using color cues computed from saturation-weighted statistics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62(7), 1862–1873 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maier-Hein, L., et al.: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 5217 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Markonis, D., et al.: Khresmoi for radiologists - visual search in radiology archives and the open-access medical literature. Health Manage. 13(3), 23–24 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Markonis, D., et al.: A survey on visual information search behavior and requirements of radiologists. Methods Inf. Med. 51(6), 539–548 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Menze, B.H., et al.: The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(10), 1993–2024 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner-Fushman, D., Antani, S.: Creating a classification of image types in the medical literature for visual categorization. In: SPIE Medical Imaging (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Müller, H., Rosset, A., Vallée, J.P., Geissbuhler, A.: Integrating content-based visual access methods into a medical case database. In: Proceedings of the Medical Informatics Europe Conference, MIE 2003, St. Malo, France, vol. 95, pp. 480–485, May 2003Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Müller, H., Unay, D.: Retrieval from and understanding of large-scale multi-modal medical datasets: a review. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 19(9), 2093–2104 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Münzer, B., Schoeffmann, K., Böszörmenyi, L.: Content-based processing and analysis of endoscopic images and videos: a survey. Multimedia Tools Appl. 77(1), 1323–1362 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Otálora, S., Atzori, M., Andrearczyk, V., Müller, H.: Image magnification regression using densenet for exploiting histopathology open access content. In: Stoyanov, D., et al. (eds.) OMIA/COMPAY -2018. LNCS, vol. 11039, pp. 148–155. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00949-6_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pogorelov, K., et al..: KVASIR: a multi-class image dataset for computer aided gastrointestinal disease detection. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference, pp. 164–169. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schaumberg, A.J., et al.: Large-scale annotation of histopathology images from social media. bioRxiv 396663 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tellez, D., et al.: Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06543 (2019)
  37. 37.
    Tsatsaronis, G., et al.: An overview of the BIOASQ large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answering competition. BMC Bioinform. 16(1), 138 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Valavanis, L., Stathopoulos, S.: IPL at ImageCLEF 2017 concept detection task. In: CLEF2017 Working Notes. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Dublin, Ireland, 11–14 September 2017. CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org
  39. 39.
    Vannier, M.W., Summers, R.M.: Sharing images. Radiology 228, 23–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Westergaard, D., Stærfeldt, H.H., Tønsberg, C., Jensen, L.J., Brunak, S.: A comprehensive and quantitative comparison of text-mining in 15 million full-text articles versus their corresponding abstracts. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14(2), e1005962 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henning Müller
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vincent Andrearczyk
    • 1
  • Oscar Jimenez del Toro
    • 1
  • Anjani Dhrangadhariya
    • 1
  • Roger Schaer
    • 1
  • Manfredo Atzori
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO)SierreSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations