Skip to main content

Employment and Wages in the Places Left Behind

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rural Families and Communities in the United States

Part of the book series: National Symposium on Family Issues ((NSFI,volume 10))

Abstract

In recent decades, labor force participation across the United States has declined but the reasons remain unclear. While some point to structural changes in the labor market composition as the driving factor, others argue that increases in the take-up of welfare and disability payments are to blame. Most existing studies document trends driven by labor market performance in major metropolitan areas. In this chapter, we analyze recent trends in the employment-to-population ratio and real wages, focusing instead on nonmetropolitan areas—the places left behind. Nonmetro areas have not recovered as quickly as metro areas have from the Great Recession. Less-educated workers in nonmetro areas employed in the manufacturing sector have fared the worst in terms of real wages. Overall, our results suggest that the decline in labor force participation rates in rural areas can be explained by a relative reduction in productivity rather than changes in welfare take-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to U.S. Census 2017 population estimates. Using older metropolitan definitions would produce a higher rural/nonmetropolitan share.

  2. 2.

    Source is U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) data.

  3. 3.

    In 2017 dollars.

  4. 4.

    This is WagesNonM/WagesMetro and \( {\left(\frac{Emp}{Pop}\right)}_{NonM}/{\left(\frac{Emp}{Pop}\right)}_{Metro} \).

  5. 5.

    For example, if the rural manufacturing employment share is 10.7% and the metropolitan manufacturing share is 6.2%, then 100∗10.7/6.2 equals a 171.3% higher nonmetro farm share.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sydney Schreiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Partridge, M.D., Pérez-Silva, R., Schreiner, S. (2020). Employment and Wages in the Places Left Behind. In: Glick, J., McHale, S., King, V. (eds) Rural Families and Communities in the United States. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37689-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics