Abstract
Since the 1980s, plans for the Sydney Olympic Park (SOP) have been underway to transform the heavily contaminated brownfield site of Homebush Bay into a thriving urban precinct of residential neighbourhoods, business districts and regional parklands. This transformation has been underpinned by Environmentally Sustainable Development (ESD) principles, as established by Sydney Olympic organisers in the bid for the 2000 Olympic Games. The Sydney Olympic Park Master Plan 2030 envisions 23,500 residents and a doubling of office spaces, responding to state goals for the growth of the Western Sydney region. Such population growth challenges SOP’s management to remain loyal to sustainable development, maintaining a ‘local’ level of engagement and participation with residents and balancing competing interests from businesses who view themselves as integral stakeholders in SOP. The importance of public participation to sustainable development and contemporary challenges to its application, especially in public- private mega-projects, is the focus of this chapter. The chapter will discuss findings from a 4-year doctoral investigation of social sustainability in the SOP and how public participation has been considered and implemented in the process of developing it, post-Games. Findings emerged from an analysis of SOP-specific planning documents, in-depth interviews with experts who have been or are working on the development of SOP, and focus groups with residents living in the neighbouring communities of Newington and Wentworth Point. The chapter will first set out the problem of Olympic parks and establish the definition of sustainable development as a social problem, thus bringing attention to the importance of public participation. It briefly introduces the methodology used, the context of SOP and presents the findings, unpacking the reality of public participation in the post-Games development of SOP and how it has been perceived by experts and residents. Findings reveal a ‘watered down’ approach to social participation strategies, as perceived by residents, despite the increasing importance of social participation in state and local planning instruments. Some of the barriers in applying strategies for social participation are discussed by experts in relation to difficulties in defining local communities, especially in a project of regional importance and the limited legal responsibility of the Sydney Olympic Park Authority for communities around its boundaries. This is taking a toll on how residents engage with SOP and how they connect to an ethos of shared values for sustainability. Novel approaches to social engagement with residents living within and around SOP’s boundaries will be critical to the ongoing management of SOP as an icon of sustainability, especially with the expected population growth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams W (2006) The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century, Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006, The World Conservation Union (IUCN). Accessed 25 Aug 2014. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf
Basiago A (1999) Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist 19(2):145–161
Beder S (1999) Through the revolving door: from Greenpeace to big business. PRWatch 6(3):1–4
Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin L, Stone A (1992) Public space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cashman R (2011) Sydney Olympic Park 2000 to 2010: history and legacy. Walla Walla Press, Sydney
Fergus A, Rowney J (2005) Sustainable development: lost meaning and opportunity? J Bus Ethics 60(1):17–27
Flyvbjerg B (2005) Machiavellian megaprojects. Antipode 37(1):18–22
Freestone R, Gibson C (2006) The cultural dimension of urban planning strategies. In: Monclus J, Guardia M (eds) Culture, urbanism and planning. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 21–42
Friedmann J (1986) The world city hypothesis. Dev Chang 17(1):69–83
Furrer P (2002) Sustainable Olympic games: a dream or a reality? Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, series XII VII(4):795–830
Gehl J (1971) Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press, Washington, DC
Gold J, Gold M (2013) “Bring it under the legacy umbrella”: Olympic host cities and the changing fortunes of the sustainability agenda. Sustainability 5(8):3526–3542
Harvey D (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B 71(1):3–17
Hester R (2006) Design for ecological democracy. The MIT Press, London
Hu R (2012) Shaping the global Sydney: the City of Sydney’s planning transformation in the 1980s and 1990s. Plan Perspect 27(3):347–368
International Olympic Committee (IOC) (2012) Sustainability through sport: implementing the Olympic Movement’s agenda 21. IOC, Lausanne
Irvine J (2012) The winner is … white elephants, Sydney Morning Herald, July 27, pp 17
Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York
Jacobs M (1999) Sustainable development: a contested concept. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–45
Kaethler M, De Blust S, Devos T (2017) Ambiguity as agency: critical opportunists in the neoliberal city. CoDesign 13(3):175–186
Keough N (2008) Sustaining authentic human experience in community. New Formations Spring(64):65–77
Krueger R, Gibbs D (eds) (2007) The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. The Guilford Press, New York
Lehrer U, Laidley J (2008) Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. Int J Urban Reg Res 32(4):786–803
Lélé S (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621
Littig B, Grießler E (2005) Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1):65–79
McGeoch R (1994) The bid: how Australia won the 2000 Olympics. William Heinemann Australia, Melbourne
NSW Government (2014) A plan for growing Sydney: a strong global city, a great place to live. NSW Government, Sydney
Pack J, Hustwit G (2013) The Olympic city. Plexi Productions
Shirai H (2009) From global field to local neighbourhood: sustainable transformation of the Olympic Park for the city. The final report, The Cities Programme, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London
Shiva V (2012) The great Rio U-turn. Parkistan Perspect 17(2):161–163
SOPA (2010) Sydney Olympic Park master plan 2030. SOPA, Sydney
SOPA (2015) President of International Olympic Committee Thomas Bach visits Sydney Olympic Park the greatest example of Olympic legacy, SOPA. Accessed 01 May 2015. http://www.sopa.nsw.gov.au/resource_centre/park_news/
Stefanovic I (2000) Safeguarding our common future: rethinking sustainable development. State University of New York Press, Albany
Sydney Olympic Park Authority (SOPA) (2008) Environmental guidelines: Sydney Olympic Park. SOPA, Sydney Olympic Park
UN-Habitat (2016) Global public space toolkit: from global principles to local principles and practices, UN-habitat. Accessed 26 June 2018. In: At. https://unhabitat.org/books/global-public-space-toolkit-from-global-principles-to-local-policies-and-practice/
Vallance S, Perkins H, Dixon J (2011) What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42(3):342–348
Wade M (2014) Sydney Olympic Park: how the west was won, The Sydney Morning Herald, 31 May. Accessed 11 June 2014. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sydney-olympic-park-how-the-west-was-won-20140530-399kc.html
Waitt G (2003) Social impacts of Sydney Olympics. Ann Tour Res 30(1):194–215
Woodcraft S, Hackett T, Caistor-Arendar L (2011) Designing for social sustainability: a framework for creating thriving new communities. The Young Foundation, London
World Commission for Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mussi, E., Steinmetz, C., Evans, C., Corkery, L. (2020). Public Participation: A Sustainable Legacy for Olympic Parks. In: Roggema, R., Roggema, A. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37635-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37635-2_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37634-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37635-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)