Skip to main content

Public Participation: A Sustainable Legacy for Olympic Parks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings

Abstract

Since the 1980s, plans for the Sydney Olympic Park (SOP) have been underway to transform the heavily contaminated brownfield site of Homebush Bay into a thriving urban precinct of residential neighbourhoods, business districts and regional parklands. This transformation has been underpinned by Environmentally Sustainable Development (ESD) principles, as established by Sydney Olympic organisers in the bid for the 2000 Olympic Games. The Sydney Olympic Park Master Plan 2030 envisions 23,500 residents and a doubling of office spaces, responding to state goals for the growth of the Western Sydney region. Such population growth challenges SOP’s management to remain loyal to sustainable development, maintaining a ‘local’ level of engagement and participation with residents and balancing competing interests from businesses who view themselves as integral stakeholders in SOP. The importance of public participation to sustainable development and contemporary challenges to its application, especially in public- private mega-projects, is the focus of this chapter. The chapter will discuss findings from a 4-year doctoral investigation of social sustainability in the SOP and how public participation has been considered and implemented in the process of developing it, post-Games. Findings emerged from an analysis of SOP-specific planning documents, in-depth interviews with experts who have been or are working on the development of SOP, and focus groups with residents living in the neighbouring communities of Newington and Wentworth Point. The chapter will first set out the problem of Olympic parks and establish the definition of sustainable development as a social problem, thus bringing attention to the importance of public participation. It briefly introduces the methodology used, the context of SOP and presents the findings, unpacking the reality of public participation in the post-Games development of SOP and how it has been perceived by experts and residents. Findings reveal a ‘watered down’ approach to social participation strategies, as perceived by residents, despite the increasing importance of social participation in state and local planning instruments. Some of the barriers in applying strategies for social participation are discussed by experts in relation to difficulties in defining local communities, especially in a project of regional importance and the limited legal responsibility of the Sydney Olympic Park Authority for communities around its boundaries. This is taking a toll on how residents engage with SOP and how they connect to an ethos of shared values for sustainability. Novel approaches to social engagement with residents living within and around SOP’s boundaries will be critical to the ongoing management of SOP as an icon of sustainability, especially with the expected population growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams W (2006) The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century, Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006, The World Conservation Union (IUCN). Accessed 25 Aug 2014. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf

  • Basiago A (1999) Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist 19(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beder S (1999) Through the revolving door: from Greenpeace to big business. PRWatch 6(3):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin L, Stone A (1992) Public space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman R (2011) Sydney Olympic Park 2000 to 2010: history and legacy. Walla Walla Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergus A, Rowney J (2005) Sustainable development: lost meaning and opportunity? J Bus Ethics 60(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2005) Machiavellian megaprojects. Antipode 37(1):18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone R, Gibson C (2006) The cultural dimension of urban planning strategies. In: Monclus J, Guardia M (eds) Culture, urbanism and planning. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (1986) The world city hypothesis. Dev Chang 17(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer P (2002) Sustainable Olympic games: a dream or a reality? Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, series XII VII(4):795–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl J (1971) Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold J, Gold M (2013) “Bring it under the legacy umbrella”: Olympic host cities and the changing fortunes of the sustainability agenda. Sustainability 5(8):3526–3542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B 71(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester R (2006) Design for ecological democracy. The MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu R (2012) Shaping the global Sydney: the City of Sydney’s planning transformation in the 1980s and 1990s. Plan Perspect 27(3):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Olympic Committee (IOC) (2012) Sustainability through sport: implementing the Olympic Movement’s agenda 21. IOC, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine J (2012) The winner is … white elephants, Sydney Morning Herald, July 27, pp 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M (1999) Sustainable development: a contested concept. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaethler M, De Blust S, Devos T (2017) Ambiguity as agency: critical opportunists in the neoliberal city. CoDesign 13(3):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough N (2008) Sustaining authentic human experience in community. New Formations Spring(64):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R, Gibbs D (eds) (2007) The sustainable development paradox: urban political economy in the United States and Europe. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer U, Laidley J (2008) Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. Int J Urban Reg Res 32(4):786–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lélé S (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littig B, Grießler E (2005) Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1):65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch R (1994) The bid: how Australia won the 2000 Olympics. William Heinemann Australia, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government (2014) A plan for growing Sydney: a strong global city, a great place to live. NSW Government, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack J, Hustwit G (2013) The Olympic city. Plexi Productions

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai H (2009) From global field to local neighbourhood: sustainable transformation of the Olympic Park for the city. The final report, The Cities Programme, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva V (2012) The great Rio U-turn. Parkistan Perspect 17(2):161–163

    Google Scholar 

  • SOPA (2010) Sydney Olympic Park master plan 2030. SOPA, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • SOPA (2015) President of International Olympic Committee Thomas Bach visits Sydney Olympic Park the greatest example of Olympic legacy, SOPA. Accessed 01 May 2015. http://www.sopa.nsw.gov.au/resource_centre/park_news/

  • Stefanovic I (2000) Safeguarding our common future: rethinking sustainable development. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Olympic Park Authority (SOPA) (2008) Environmental guidelines: Sydney Olympic Park. SOPA, Sydney Olympic Park

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (2016) Global public space toolkit: from global principles to local principles and practices, UN-habitat. Accessed 26 June 2018. In: At. https://unhabitat.org/books/global-public-space-toolkit-from-global-principles-to-local-policies-and-practice/

  • Vallance S, Perkins H, Dixon J (2011) What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42(3):342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade M (2014) Sydney Olympic Park: how the west was won, The Sydney Morning Herald, 31 May. Accessed 11 June 2014. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sydney-olympic-park-how-the-west-was-won-20140530-399kc.html

  • Waitt G (2003) Social impacts of Sydney Olympics. Ann Tour Res 30(1):194–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcraft S, Hackett T, Caistor-Arendar L (2011) Designing for social sustainability: a framework for creating thriving new communities. The Young Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission for Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveline Mussi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mussi, E., Steinmetz, C., Evans, C., Corkery, L. (2020). Public Participation: A Sustainable Legacy for Olympic Parks. In: Roggema, R., Roggema, A. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37635-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics