Skip to main content

The Artificial Intelligence Singularity: What It Is and What It Is Not

  • 3691 Accesses

Abstract

The topic of this chapter is artificial intelligence singularity. The artificial intelligence discussed in this chapter is general artificial intelligence that might appear as the result of numerous self-improvement cycles which result in a highly advanced version of the intelligence that people created. Using insights from classical philosophical anthropology into what characteristics are present in live beings author suggests that there are enough similarities between beings which are traditionally considered to be alive and the possible advanced general intelligence to claim that through analogy we should prepare ourselves to accept this hypothetical artificial intelligence as a being which is alive.

Keywords

  • Life
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Philosophical anthropology
  • Singularity
  • Responsibilities

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As an example please see [3].

  2. 2.

    A note is needed here to say that there is no reason to think that advanced AI will have the same structure as human intelligence if it even ever happens, but since it is in human nature to present states of the world in a way that is closest to us, a certain degree of anthropomorphizing is hard to avoid.

  3. 3.

    In writing this part of the chapter I am heavily relying on Belic’s classical textbook [9, pp. 13–21] and his presentation of the argument for all the things that are being claimed about life in classical PA.

  4. 4.

    It is worth pointing out that this chapter and the systems of thought presented here are profoundly under the influence of Aristotelian, Thomistic, and scholastic traditions in philosophy.

  5. 5.

    A question which seems important to me regarding reproduction for which I do not have a clear idea how to answer is: Will an AI offspring be the same as an original AI or will it have elements which separate it from its parents? This question seems tricky because when there are different material elements to different beings, it seems pretty easy to differentiate one individual from another, but what happens when there is no material component needed?.

References

  1. Müller VC (2016) Editorial: risks of artificial intelligence. In: Müller VC (ed) Risks of general intelligence. CRC Press, Chapman and Hill, London, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Müller VC, Bostrom N (2016) Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion. In: Müller VC (ed) Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. Springer, Synthese Library, Berlin, pp 443–571

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Eden AH, Moor JH, Soraker JH, Steinhart E (2012) Singularity hypotheses. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearce D, Moor JH, Eden AH, Steinhart E (2012) Introduction to: singular hypotheses: a scientific and philosophical assessment. In: Eden AH, Moor JH, Soraker JH, Steinhart E (eds) Singularity hypotheses. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turing AM (1996) Intelligent machinery, a heretical theory. Philos Math 4(3):256–260

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinge V (1983) First word. OMNI 256–260

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chalmers DJ (2010) The singularity: a philosophical analysis. J Conscious Stud 17:7–65

    Google Scholar 

  9. Belić M (1995) Metafizička antropologija. Filozofsko-teološki institute Družbe Isusove u Zagrebu, Croatia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yampolskiy RV (2015) Analysis of types of self-improving software. In: Bieger J (ed) Artificial super intelligence: a futuristic approach. Springer International Publishing, pp 384–393

    Google Scholar 

  11. Omohundro S (2012) Rational artificial intelligence for the greater good. In: Eden AH (ed) Singularity hypotheses, pp 161–179. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolstrom N (2014) Superintelligence. Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helm L, Muehlhauser L (2012) The singularity and machine ethics. In: Eden AH (ed) Singularity hypotheses. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 101–125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borna Jalšenjak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jalšenjak, B. (2020). The Artificial Intelligence Singularity: What It Is and What It Is Not. In: Skansi, S. (eds) Guide to Deep Learning Basics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37591-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37591-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37590-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37591-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)