Skip to main content

Reinforcement Learning Method for Ad Networks Ordering in Real-Time Bidding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2019)

Abstract

High turnover of online advertising and especially real time bidding makes this ad market very attractive to beneficiary stakeholders. For publishers, it is as easy as placing some slots in their webpages and sell these slots in the available online auctions. It is important to determine which online auction market to send their slots to. Based on the traditional Waterfall Strategy, publishers have a fixed ordering of preferred online auction markets, and sell the ad slots by trying these markets sequentially. This fixed-order strategy replies heavily on the experience of publishers, and often it does not provide highest revenue. In this paper, we propose a method for dynamically deciding on the ordering of auction markets for each available ad slot. This method is based on reinforcement learning (RL) and learns the state-action through a tabular method. Since the state-action space is sparse, a prediction model is used to solve this sparsity. We analyze a real-time bidding dataset, and then show that the proposed RL method on this dataset leads to higher revenues. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the parameters of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is the case for online publishers who rely on SSPs to sell their impressions.

References

  1. Afshar, R.R., Zhang, Y., Firat, M., Kaymak, U.: A decision support method to increase the revenue of ad publishers in waterfall strategy. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afshar, R.R., Zhang, Y., Firat, M., Kaymak, U.: A reinforcement learning method to select ad networks in waterfall strategy. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 256–265. SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Austin, D., Seljan, S., Monello, J., Tzeng, S.: Reserve price optimization at scale. In: 2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pp. 528–536. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balseiro, S.R., Feldman, J., Mirrokni, V., Muthukrishnan, S.: Yield optimization of display advertising with ad exchange. Manag. Sci. 60(12), 2886–2907 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Busch, O.: The programmatic advertising principle. In: Busch, O. (ed.) Programmatic Advertising. MP, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25023-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, H., et al.: Real-time bidding by reinforcement learning in display advertising. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 661–670. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinodia, P.: Header bidding vs waterfall: how the two revenue optimisation hacks differ (2017). https://www.adpushup.com/blog/header-bidding-vs-waterfall/

  9. Ghosh, A., McAfee, P., Papineni, K., Vassilvitskii, S.: Bidding for representative allocations for display advertising. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 208–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Japkowicz, N., et al.: Learning from imbalanced data sets: a comparison of various strategies. In: AAAI Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, Menlo Park, CA, vol. 68, pp. 10–15 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, M.J., Viola, P.: Robust real-time object detection. In: Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, vol. 266, p. 56 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., Ni, X., Yuan, Y.: The reserve price of ad impressions in multi-channel real-time bidding markets. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 5(2), 583–592 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muthukrishnan, S.: Ad exchanges: research issues. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rhuggenaath, J., Akcay, A., Zhang, Y., Kaymak, U.: Fuzzy logic based pricing combined with adaptive search for reserve price optimization in online ad auctions. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rhuggenaath, J., Akcay, A., Zhang, Y., Kaymak, U.: Optimizing reserve prices for publishers in online ad auctions. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rhuggenaath, J., Akcay, A., Zhang, Y., Kaymak, U.: A PSO-based algorithm for reserve price optimization in online ad auctions. In: 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rhuggenaath, J., Zhang, Y., Akcay, A., Kaymak, U.: Optimal display-ad allocation with guaranteed contracts and supply side platforms, working paper (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G., et al.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vengerov, D.: A gradient-based reinforcement learning approach to dynamic pricing in partially-observable environments. Future Gene. Comput. Syst. 24(7), 687–693 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, J., Zhang, W., Yuan, S., et al.: Display advertising with real-time bidding (RTB) and behavioural targeting. Found. Trends® Inf. Retrieval 11(4–5), 297–435 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, D., et al.: Budget constrained bidding by model-free reinforcement learning in display advertising. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1443–1451. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, W.C.H., Yeh, M.Y., Chen, M.S.: Predicting winning price in real time bidding with censored data. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1305–1314. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xie, Z., Lee, K.C., Wang, L.: Optimal reserve price for online ads trading based on inventory identification. In: Proceedings of the ADKDD 2017, p. 6. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan, S., Wang, J., Chen, B., Mason, P., Seljan, S.: An empirical study of reserve price optimisation in real-time bidding. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1897–1906. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zawadziński, M.: What’s the difference between waterfall auctions & header bidding? (2016). http://bit.ly/2KpT5Po

  27. Zhang, W., Yuan, S., Wang, J.: Optimal real-time bidding for display advertising. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1077–1086. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by EU EUROSTARS (Project E! 11582).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Reza Refaei Afshar , Yingqian Zhang , Murat Firat or Uzay Kaymak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Refaei Afshar, R., Zhang, Y., Firat, M., Kaymak, U. (2019). Reinforcement Learning Method for Ad Networks Ordering in Real-Time Bidding. In: van den Herik, J., Rocha, A., Steels, L. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37494-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics