Abstract
In recent years, a new approach to incorporate the process perspective in the surgical procedural training through Process Mining has been proposed. In this approach, training executions are recorded, to later generate end-to-end process models for the students, describing their execution. Although those end-to-end models are useful for the students, they do not fully capture the needs of the instructors of the training programs. This article proposes a taxonomy of activities for surgical process models, analyzes the specific questions instructors have about the student execution and their undesired procedural behavior, and proposes the Procedural Behavior Instrument, an instrument to answer them in an easy-to-interpret way. A real case was used to test the approach, and a preliminary validity was developed by a medical expert.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
Corvetto, M.A., Pedemonte, J.C., Varas, D., Fuentes, C., Altermatt, F.R.: Simulation-based training program with deliberate practice for ultrasound-guided jugular central venous catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 61, 1184–1191 (2017)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 319–340 (1989)
Fernández-Llatas, C., Meneu, T., Traver, V., Benedi, J.: Applying evidence-based medicine in telehealth: an interactive pattern recognition approximation. Med. J. Islamic Repub. Iran (MJIRI) 10, 32–45 (2018)
de la Fuente, R.: Entrenamiento en Destrezas Procedurales: Oportunidades desde el análisis de Minería de Procesos. Master’s thesis, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (2018)
Ilgen, J.S., Ma, I.W., Hatala, R., Cook, D.A.: A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Med. Educ. 49(2), 161–173 (2015)
Khanghahi, M.E., Azar, F.E.F.: Direct observation of procedural skills (dops) evaluation method: Systematic review of evidence. Med. J. Islamic Repub. Iran (MJIRI) 32–45 (2018)
Lalys, F., Jannin, P.: Surgical process modelling: a review. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 9(3), 495–511 (2014)
Lira, R., et al.: Process-oriented feedback through process mining for surgical procedures in medical training: The ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement case. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16(11) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111877, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/1877
Munoz-Gama, J., de la Fuente, R., Sepúlveda, M., Fuentes, R.: Conformance checking challenge 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:c923af09-ce93-44c3-ace0-c5508cf103ad
Rojas, E., Sepúlveda, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Capurro, D., Traver, V., Fernandez-Llatas, C.: Question-driven methodology for analyzing emergency room processes using process mining. Appl. Sci. 7(3), 302 (2017)
Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by CONICYT FONDECYT 11170092, CONICYT REDI 170136, VRI-UC INTERDISCIPLINA II170003, and FOND-DCC 2017-0001. CONICYT-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2019-21190116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Galvez, V. et al. (2019). Understanding Undesired Procedural Behavior in Surgical Training: The Instructor Perspective. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Dijkman, R., Zdun, U. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37452-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37453-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)