Skip to main content

Examination of Analysis Method of Opinion Distribution in News Media Transferred on Web

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 23rd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems (IES 2019)

Part of the book series: Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization ((PALO,volume 12))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The global spread of public networks and social environment systems is not only a positive has some potential downsides aspect. It is transforming us into a society where information exchange, decision making, and consensus building are made across various boundaries. In particular, public opinion tends to decline due owing to the amplification of the echo chambers in unconscious consensus building, and it can be seen that online speech tends to have a major impact on mental health. In this research, the sentiments (Negative/Positive/Neutral), we are obtained from comments made from in response to videos transferred from various news media found on YouTube, which transmits media and information related to our daily lives, and is considered in the analysis of the distribution of opinions in various references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. French, J.R.P.: A formal theory of social power. Psychol. Rev. 63, 181–194 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harary, F.: A criterion for unanimity in French ’s theory of social power. In: Cartwright, D. (ed.) Studies in Social Power. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshiaki, Z., Sugiyama, M., Yamaki, N.: Group AHP using consensus building model. J. Oper. Res. 40(2), 236–244 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yahata, N., et al.: A population interval AHP method using dissatisfaction function. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 45(3), 268–284 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamaki, N., Sekiya, K.: Large-scale AHP with incomplete data (determination theory and related fields) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hjarvard, S.: The mediatization of society. Nordicom Rev. 29(2), 102–131 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC 10, 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal, A., et al.: Sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siersdorfer, S., et al.: How useful are your comments?: analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347–354. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sato, K., et al.: Correlation between web data and stock price fluctuations by negative-positive analysis (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lasswell, H.D.: The measurement of public opinion. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 25(2), 311–326 (1931)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasswell, H.D.: Why be quantitative. Lang. Politics 40–52, 1949 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galam, S.: Rational group decision making: a random field Ising model at T = 0. Phys. A 238(1–4), 66–80 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J.: Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11(6), 1157–1165 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bird, S., Loper, E.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kawahata, Y., Ishii, A.: Consideration of simulation of consensus formation Online using Sociophysics method, GDN 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to also thank you for the support from the 2019 Scholarly Scholars Research Grant Program (Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers (LEADER)), which provided support for this research in general.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuko Kawahata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kawahata, Y. (2020). Examination of Analysis Method of Opinion Distribution in News Media Transferred on Web. In: Sato, H., Iwanaga, S., Ishii, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 23rd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems. IES 2019. Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37442-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics