With this book, we are aiming to provide answers to three essential questions: what are Knowledge Graphs, how are they built and accessed, and why are they important? We elaborated on several possible definitions of Knowledge Graphs and identified as core feature the extremely large amount of interlinked data they try to turn into knowledge. This significantly exceeds any traditional AI approach. We described in detail several approaches for constructing, hosting, curating, and deploying Knowledge Graphs, and we showed their usage for dialog-based information access that revolutionizes information access by humans. We described applications in the areas of e-tourism and beyond.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. R. Akerkar, P. Sajja, Knowledge-Based Systems (Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, 2010)Google Scholar
  2. R.J. Brachman, The future of knowledge representation, in Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI1990), 29 July–3 August 1990 (AAAI Press, Boston)Google Scholar
  3. H. Eriksson, Y. Sahar, S.W. Tu, A.R. Puerta, M.A. Musen, Task modeling with reusable problem-solving methods. Artif. Intell. 79(2), 293–326 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Fensel, J. Angele, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, H. Schnurr, R. Studer, A. Witt, Lessons learned from applying AI to the web. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 9(4), 361–382 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. L.A. Galárraga, C. Teflioudi, K. Hose, F.M. Suchanek, AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW2013), 13–17 May 2013 (ACM, Rio de Janeiro)Google Scholar
  6. L. Galárraga, C. Teflioudi, K. Hose, F.M. Suchanek, Fast rule mining in ontological knowledge bases with AMIE+. Int. J. Very Large Data Bases 24(6), 707–730 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R.V. Guha, Contexts: A Formalization and Some Applications, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, STAN-CS-91-1399-Thesis.guha, 1991Google Scholar
  8. D.B. Lenat, CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun. ACM 38(11), 33–38 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Paulheim, Machine learning with and for Semantic Web knowledge graphs, ed. by C. d’Amato, M. Theobald, in Proceedings of the 14th International Summer School 2018: Reasoning Web. Learning, Uncertainty, Streaming, and Scalability: Tutorial Lectures, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, 22–26 September 2018a. Springer LNCS, vol. 11078Google Scholar
  10. H. Paulheim, How much is a triple? Estimating the cost of knowledge graph creation, in Proceedings of the 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2018): Posters & Demonstrations, Industry and Blue Sky Ideas Tracks, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2180, Monterey, 8–12 October 2018bGoogle Scholar
  11. A.T. Schreiber, B. Wielinga, J. Breuker, KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol 11 (Academic, London, 1993)Google Scholar
  12. R. Socher, D. Chen, C.D. Manning, A.Y. Ng, Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion, in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS2013)—Volume 1, Lake Tahoe, 05–10 December 2013Google Scholar
  13. G. Töpper, M. Knuth, H. Sack, DBpedia ontology enrichment for inconsistency detection, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems (SEMANTICS2012), 5–7 September 2012 (ACM, Graz)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semantic Technology Institute Innsbruck, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Onlim GmbHTelfsAustria

Personalised recommendations