Skip to main content

Development of Landscape-Adaptive Land Use of the Upper Volga Region Based on Geostatistical Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Modelling and Decision Support

Part of the book series: Innovations in Landscape Research ((ILR))

  • 548 Accesses

Abstract

The article describes the applying of statistical methods in research in the field of agricultural geography—the science of the emergence, functioning, and development of agro-geosystems. The agro-geological systems are understood as geocomplexes, certain components of which are changed as a result of human agricultural activity. The paper shows the use of analysis of variance in determining the influence of environmental features of geocomplexes of various ranks on the yield of plants and some other production and natural parameters of farms. The characteristics of the main macro-geocomplexes (agro-ecological sections and meso-geocomplexes), genera, and types of agricultural landscapes located within the Tver region, Russia, and whose conditions are the objects of analysis. Studies have shown that crop yield variability, soil acidity, as well as the proportion of pastures in farms are less than 30% determined by the peculiarities of the natural environment of geosystems of different levels. From 30 to 50% of the content’s variability of plant nutrients in the soil, their rockiness and swampiness, as well as the proportion of hay harvests in farms depend on the natural structure of geosystem. Other elements of the structural organization of agricultural enterprises are more than half determined by the nature of the interaction of macro-, meso-, and microterritories. The influence of landscape factors on plant productivity is individual for each crop. So the main part of the variability of potato yield is explained by differences at the micro-level. Only 10–13% of the variability of the yield of perennial grasses and 11–14% of grain yield are explained by the effect of macro factors. For flax, this indicator is 17–19%. The combination of agro-climatic—neotectonic and granulometric properties of agro-geosystems determines about 8% of the yield variability of annual grasses. Consequently, the process of determining the set of crops for the development of farming systems should be based on knowledge of the variability of their yields, primarily within the types and kinds of agricultural landscapes, and, if possible, at lower taxonomic levels. Indicators such as the degree of development of agricultural landscapes and the average size of the contour of farming land can be very confidently determined when analyzing the conditions of the macroenvironment. However, in this case, it is necessary to take into account local peculiarities which may lead to significant adjustments in each individual farm. The use of track analysis allows it to identify the factors of direct impact on the production process of crops. The comparison of its results with the data of correlation analysis allows it to highlight the “active” factors, the effect of which is described by reliable travel and correlation coefficients, and the “potential” factors whose direct influence is obscured by many reasons. The analysis showed that all the studied types of agricultural landscapes of the upper Volga region can be divided into two groups according to the number of active and potential factors, i.e., in geocomplexes with a relatively homogeneous lithogenic basis and in landscapes on two-layered sediments. The latter are distinguished by a large number of active factors and, commonly, by a wider range, exposed to their effects by crops. This allows us to conclude that the design of crop rotations in the above described groups of landscapes should take into account an individual set of factors which are actively or potentially influencing the production process. The paper shows that the methodology for assessing the productivity of agricultural landscapes can be based on the use of its integral indicators. In conjunction with geographic information systems and mathematical modeling techniques, they allow to reveal areas for measures to optimize the melioration status of geocomplexes. The paper identifies systems of environmental management and land melioration measures aimed to increase the degree of the potential productivity of agricultural landscapes for legume-grass stands. All systems can be combined into three groups: (1) adaptive placement of grasslands depending on the granulometry and geological structure of the soil; (2) adaptive placement of grassland with drainage/irrigation amelioration; and (3) adaptive placement of grassland with water amelioration and land management activities (integration of a certain number of fields for hay harvest into the crop rotation). Areas of these groups of activities were identified at the periphery of the upper Volga region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlas (1964) Atlas of the Kalinin region. Moscow: GUGK, 34 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Belova IV, Kireycheva LV, Ustinov MT (2008) forecast of productivity of agricultural lands of the Barabinsk lowland using GIS technologies. Reclam Water Manag 1:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorofeev (1990) Legend of the landscape map of Tver region. M: GUGK MAPS, MAPS

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov DA (2012) Agree (theoretical and applied aspects). Monograph, LAP LAMBERT ACADEMIC PUBLISHING Gmbh & Co. KG Heinish-BocKing, Str. Saarbrucken, Deutschland, 311 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashtanov AN, Shcherbakov AT (1993) Landscape agriculture. Guidelines for the development of landscape systems of agriculture in multicultural agriculture. Part 2: Kursk, 110 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashtanov AN, Lisetsky FN, Shvebs GI (1994) Fundamentals of landscape-ecological farming/AN Chestnut. Moscow: Kolos, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Kireicheva LV, Belova IV, Khokhlova OB (2006) A methodology for predicting the production capacity and the formation of a stable, Melia-risovannogo of the agricultural landscape. Sat. “Methods and technologies of complex reclamation and ecosystem water use”, M., 602 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kireicheva LV, Belova IV, Karpenko NP, Agaev SB, Dedova EB, Konieva GN (2008) Technology management productivity of reclaimed agricultural lands in various regions of the Russian Federation. M., 82 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiryushin VI (1993) The concept of adaptive-landscape agriculture. Pushchino, 95 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiryushin VI (1996) Ecological bases of agriculture. M.: Kolos, 367 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalev NG, Khodyrev AA, Ivanov DA, Tyulin VA (2004) Agrolandshaftov. Tutorial, Russian Academy of agricultural Sciences, Ministry of agriculture, TGSH, VNIIMS, Tver-Moscow, 490c

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalev NG, Smirnov AA, Ivanov DA et al (2000) Theoretical bases of creation of adaptive landscape-meliorative systems of agriculture and their model models (projects) for various natural and economic conditions of the humid zone. kN.I, of Tver, 119c

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkov FN (1973) People and landscapes. M.: Thought, 224 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of agriculture (1990) Application of agromeliorative measures on drained mineral lands of non-Chernozem zone of the RSFSR (technological regulations). The Ministry of agriculture of the RSFSR, VNIIMS, Sevniigim M 58 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev V (1987) The concept of agricultural landscape. Vestnik MGU Ser. 5, Geography, 2, pp 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev V (1997) Landscape Science and agriculture. Structure, functioning, evolution of natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Theses landscape conference M. - SPB, pp 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegov SA, Khomyakov PM (1991) Modeling of ecological systems development. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 224c

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky VS (1966) Landscape research. M.: Science, 127 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokaev VI (1983) Physical and geographical zoning. M.: Education, 176s

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlovsky AI, Martynov SP, Mamonov LK (1982) Genetic and statistical approaches to the theory of selection of self-pollinating crops. Alma-ATA: Science, 198 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Shcherbakov AP, Volodin VM et al. (1994) Landscape agriculture and agrobiodiversity. Agriculture 2:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvebs GI (1988) The concept of paragenetic landscapes and nature management. Geography and practice of science. M., pp 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidelman FR (1991) Ecological and soil reclamation in humid landscapes. M.: Agropromizdat, 320 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ivanov, D.A., Grits, N.V. (2020). Development of Landscape-Adaptive Land Use of the Upper Volga Region Based on Geostatistical Methods. In: Mirschel, W., Terleev, V., Wenkel, KO. (eds) Landscape Modelling and Decision Support. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37421-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics