Skip to main content

Sri Aurobindo’s Theory of Spiritual Evolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism

Abstract

Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy of spiritual evolution was based on ideas found in Indian spiritual texts but also incorporated Western ideas. Born in India, he was educated in England between 1879 and 1892, when the question of evolution dominated British scholarly and popular discourse. Although his theory as a whole was original, it is possible to break it down into its constituent elements. It incorporates the central idea of nineteenth-century Western evolutionary philosophy as he understood it: the development of complex forms through physical evolution. It also incorporates two key elements of Vedanta (the philosophy based on the Upanishads) as he understood it: the One Being or brahman and the perfection of the soul through rebirth. To this Vedantic basis he added two ideas that he found implicit in the Upanishads and the Vedas—the development of higher levels of consciousness and the emergence of a “supramental” and spiritual consciousness—as well as two ideas he seems to have encountered in esoteric and religious sources: the “involution” of consciousness prior to its evolution and the possibility of the divinization of the human being. Viewed historically, Aurobindo’s theory was one of many attempts by nineteenth- and twentieth-century thinkers to harmonize science and spirituality. It also may be viewed as an attempt to show that life is not the product of chance but has a long-term purpose. In this essay I give a synchronic as well as diachronic presentation of Aurobindo’s theory, attempting to trace intellectual influences but taking seriously the idea that individual minds may arrive at independent formulations of ideas that recur across historical periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brahmo writers always referred to their religion as “Theism,” by which they meant worship of the formless Supreme Being (Pruthi 2004: 158). “Theism” in the Brahmo sense differs from “theism” as used today, that is, belief in God or gods, and also from “Deism,” a word that has gone through several changes of meaning but now is connected especially with belief in a Creator who does not intervene in the workings of his creation.

  2. 2.

    Dermot Killingley deals with Keshub Sen and Vivekananda at some length in his essay in this volume. I confine myself to Keshub’s treatment of divinization and Vivekananda’s treatment of involution.

  3. 3.

    “Author of life Divine,” sometimes incorrectly attributed to Charles Wesley, is found in many hymnals, for example Hymns Ancient and Modern (1875).

  4. 4.

    By thus breaking down Aurobindo’s theory into units of idea and influence I am mirroring the methodology of Arthur O. Lovejoy, which he presented to the world in his 1936 book The Great Chain of Being . Lovejoy wrote that the history of ideas should be concerned not with doctrines or systems but their “component elements” or “unit-ideas.” Lovejoy demonstrated his method by showing that “the great chain of being,” a dominant literary and philosophical topos from the time of Neoplatonism till the eighteenth century, was composed of the unit-ideas of plenitude, continuity, and gradation (Lovejoy 2001: 3, 61–62, 183). His analytical approach allowed him to trace unit-ideas as they combined, separated, and re-combined across cultures and periods. This approach dominated the history of ideas until the late 1960s, when it was attacked by Quentin Skinner, Michel Foucault, and others. To Skinner the weakness of the unit-idea method was its blindness to historical context; this frequently resulted in “empirically false claims” of historical continuity (Skinner 1969: 35). Foucault felt similarly that Lovejoy-style historians were too narrowly focused on tracing the origin and transmission of thoughts and images to be able to comprehend discourses “in their specificity” (Foucault 1972: 135–140). Simply stated, the Lovejoy method missed out on particular forests by looking too closely at individual species of trees. For all that, Skinner, Foucault and most other historians of thought since 1970 have spent a lot of time examining individual texts, ideas and terms. It is impossible to understand a forest without a detailed knowledge of the genealogy and anatomy of its constituent trees.

References

  • Aurobindo, Sri. 1997. Essays on the Gita. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Essays in Philosophy and Yoga. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Kena and Other Upanishads. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003a. Early Cultural Writings. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Isha and Other Upanishads. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Life Divine. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Autobiographical Notes and Other Writings of Historical Interest. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzun, Jacques. 1981. Darwin, Marx, Wagner: Critique of a Heritage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basham, A.L. 2009. History and Doctrines of the Ajivikas. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri. 1944. Creative Evolution. Trans. Arthur Mitchell. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besant, Annie. 1901. Esoteric Christianity or the Lesser Mysteries. London/Benares: Theosophical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1918. The Ancient Wisdom. Madras: Theosophical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. 1994. Isis Unveiled. Wheaton: Quest Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Secret Doctrine: The Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. Mackenzie. 2010. Vivekananda and the Scientific Legitimation of Advaita Vedanta. In Handbook of Religion and the Authority of Science, ed. James R. Lewis and Olav Hammer, 205–248. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, J.P. 1879. An Essay on Spiritual Evolution. London: Trübner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goblet d’Alviella, Eugène. 1885. The Contemporary Evolution of Religious Thought in England, America and India. Trans. J. Morden. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Asa. 1880. Natural Science and Religion. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1888. Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. New York: Appleton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, Gregory, ed. and trans. 2002. Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymns Ancient and Modern. n.d. [1875]. (London: William Clowes and Sons, Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingley, Dermot. 1995. Hinduism, Darwinism, and Evolution in Late-Nineteenth-Century India. In Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. David Amigoni and Jeff Wallace, 174–202. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Jeffrey D. 2012. The Theosophical Society: The History of a Spiritualist Movement. Boca Raton: Brown Walker Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur O. 2001. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj, Ayon. 2015. Toward a New Hermeneutics of the Bhagavad Gita: Sri Ramakrishna, Sri Aurobindo, and the Secret of Vijnana. Philosophy East and West 65: 1209–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Gerald. 1871. Concerning Spiritualism. London: James Burns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, James R. 1979. The Post-Darwinian Controversies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, Meera. 2010. Madame Blavatsky’s Children: Modern Hindu Encounters with Darwinism. In Handbook of Religion and the Authority of Science, ed. James R. Lewis and Olav Hammer, 279–344. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Congregational Hymn Book. n.d. [1855]. London: Hodder and Stauton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruthi, R.K. 2004. Brahmo Samaj and Indian Civilization. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck, Valerie, ed. and trans. 2003. The Upanishads. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Keshub Chunder. 1901. Keshub Chunder Sen’s Lectures in India. London: Cassell and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory 8: 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. 1898. First Principles. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Balfour, and P.G. Tait. 1875. The Unseen Universe or Physical Speculations on a Future State. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 2008. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda, Swami. 1989. The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, 8 vols. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1875. On Miracles and Modern Spiritualism. London: James Burns.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heehs, P. (2020). Sri Aurobindo’s Theory of Spiritual Evolution. In: Brown, C.M. (eds) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37340-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics