Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Communication in the Intertwining of the Local and the Digital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Local and the Digital in Environmental Communication

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on the intertwining of the local and the digital in environmental communication. We interrogate the local in terms of place, and take a retrospective look at our discipline to review if, and how, the geographical scale and social interactivity enhanced by digital media have transformed how we, as researchers and practitioners, communicate the environment. This exercise begins with the birth of modern environmental consciousness during the 1960s and concludes at the current juncture. We adopt a wave metaphor to tease out major shifts over this period, exploring the dialectics between geographical scale and social interconnectivity. To understand these changes, we begin to unpack key concepts of ‘the local’ and ‘the digital’ in conjunction with ‘the global’ and ‘place’. Our observations, while not exhaustive, acknowledge the growth of digital media use and its impacts on environmental communication practice and scholarship. Here, we identify both stability and change, tempering our enthusiasm for the digital with the caveat that inequalities in power, wealth and position persist. We are thus reluctant to announce a ‘digital turn’ in the field, identifying instead the need for more critical approaches capable of engaging with the wider consequences of this changing media landscape. In this volume, during a third wave of environmental communication, where local places meet digital networks, we present 11 investigations conducted around the globe that explore these intersections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abitbol, A., Meeks, J., & Cummins, R. G. (2019). Does oil and goodwill mix?: Examining the oil and gas industry’s impact on stakeholder engagement on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, P. C., & Gynnild, A. (2013). Environmental messages in online media: The role of place. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2014). Media, environment and the network society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appelgren, E. (2018). An illusion of interactivity: The paternalistic side of data journalism. Journalism Practice, 12(3), 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., Schmitt, J. B., De Silva-Schmidt, F., & Brüggemann, M. (2018). Climate engagement in a digital age: Exploring the drivers of participation in climate discourse online in the context of COP21. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autry, M. K., & Kelly, A. R. (2012). Merging Duke Energy and Progress Energy: Online public discourse, post-Fukushima reactions, and the absence of environmental communication. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(2), 278–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1994). Media (mis)communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengston, D. N., Fan, D. P., Reed, P., & Goldhor-Wilcock, A. (2009). Rapid issue tracking: A method for taking the pulse of the public discussion of environmental policy. Environmental Communication, 3(3), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, E. F., & Tillery, D. (2019). The circulation of climate change denial online: Rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Freire, F., de Aguilera-Moyano, M., & Rodríguez-Castro, M. (2018). The impact of global platforms on media competition and on the results of European communication companies. Communications and Society, 31(3), 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill, J. G. (2008). A sense of self-in-place for adaptive management, capacity building and public participation. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), The environmental communication yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 179–200). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13, 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. (1997). Environmentalism and the mass media: The North–South divide (Global environmental change series). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. D., & Themudo, N. S. (2006). Linking the web and the street: Internet-based “dotcauses” and the “anti-globalization” movement. World Development, 34(1), 50–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, S. E., & Hester, J. B. (2019). Three dimensions of social media messaging success by environmental NGOs. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, S. E., & Park, Y. E. (2018). On the field of environmental communication: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature. Environmental Communication, 12(7), 862–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. B. (2006). Communicating nature: How we create and understand environmental messages. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Van Dijck, J. (2015). Researching social media as if the social mattered. Social Media Society, 1(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., et al. (2018a). Media and communications. In International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP) (Ed.), Rethinking society for the 21st century (pp. 523–562). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., et al. (2018b). Media, communication and the struggle for social progress. Global Media and Communication, 14(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. R. (2006). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., & Depoe, S. (2015). Emergence and growth of the ‘field’ of environmental communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 13–25). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2010). New cultural geography – An unfinished project? Cultural Geographies, 17(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces (The organizational experience in modern society). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delicath, J. W., Elsenbeer, M. A., & Depoe, S. P. (2004). Communication and public participation in environmental decision making. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Pont, J. (2000). Sostenibilitat en una òptica global. Economia, empresa i societat. Barcelona: Beta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Pont, J. (2017). Mapping the changes of CSR stakeholder perceptions in a context of economic depression in Spain: An approach from communication and governance. In L. M. Gómez et al. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Concepts, perspectives and emerging trends in Ibero-America (pp. 89–110). Croydon: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340(6228), 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan Sjölander, A. (2016). Journalistik och komplexa beslut. In O. Westerlund (Ed.), Människorna, medierna och marknaden: medieutredningens forskningsantologi om en demokrati i förändring (pp. 351–375). Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facht, U., & Ohlsson, J. (2019). Medie-Sverige 2019. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell-Norton, K. (2018). Environmental communication and critical coastal policy: Communities, culture and nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M. (2019). Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change, 55, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A., & Fischer, F. (1999). Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse. In Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (1993). The mass media and environmental issues (Studies in communication and society). Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2010). Environment, media and communication. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A., & Cox, R. (2015). Introduction: Environment and communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J., & Pribram, E. D. (2004). Losing our cool? Following Williams and Grossberg on emotions. Cultural Studies, 18(6), 863–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermida, A., & Young, M. L. (2019). Data journalism and the regeneration of news. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, K., & Karlsson, M. (2015). “Random acts of journalism?”: How citizen journalists tell the news in Sweden. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1795–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopke, J. E. (2016). Translocal anti-fracking activism: An exploration of network structure and tie content. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 380–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, C., & Anderson, A. (2019). Increasing local salience of climate change: The un-tapped impact of the media-science interface. Environmental Communication, 13(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1611615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, B. (2016). The many modalities of social networking: The role of Twitter in greens politics. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. C., Schein, R. H., & Winders, J. (2013). Introduction. In N. C. Johnson, R. H. Schein, & J. Winders (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography (pp. 26–39). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joosse, S., & Brydges, T. (2018). Blogging for sustainability: The intermediary role of personal green blogs in promoting sustainability. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 686–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kääpä, P. (2018). Environmental management of the media: Policy, industry, practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamieniecki, S. (1993). Environmental politics in the international arena: Movements, parties, organizations, and policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: The case of Greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E. (2004). Sustainable communication and the dominant social paradigm: Can they be integrated? Marketing Theory, 4(3), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koteyko, N., Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I. (2015). Climate change communication and the internet: Challenges and opportunities for research. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, M., & Witlox, N. (1993). Communication and the environment. Communication Research Trends, 13(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrondo Ureta, A., & Peña Fernández, S. (2018). Keeping pace with journalism training in the age of social media and convergence: How worthwhile is it to teach online skills? Journalism, 19(6), 877–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. M., Van Dyke, M. S., & Cummins, R. G. (2018). A missed opportunity?: NOAA’s use of social media to communicate climate science. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. (2010). Media and environment: Conflict, politics and the news. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. (2019). Global trade and mediatised environmental protest: The view from here. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lischinsky, A., & Egan Sjölander, A. (2014). Talking green in the public sphere: Press releases, corporate voices and the environment. Nordicom Review, 35(Special Issue), 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2019). Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & New Media, 20(2), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: The impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 747–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeseele, P. (2015). Beyond the post-political zeitgeist. In H. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 429–443). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1997). A global sense of place. In T. Barnes & D. Gregory (Eds.), Reading human geography. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, R., & Miller, T. (2012). Greening the media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1984). The journalists and technology: Reporting about love canal and three Mile Island. Minerva, 22, 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A., & Lee, J. (1993). Sounding the global alarm: Environmental-qüestions in the United-States national news. Social Studies of Science, 23(4), 681–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, M., Forde, S., Ewart, J., & Foxwell, K. (2009). Making good sense: Transformative processes in community journalism. Journalism, 10(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, J. (1986). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, M. (2013). Communicating the true ecological cost of development: Addressing development and environment in Orissa, India. In J. Servaes (Ed.), Sustainable development and green communication (pp. 147–169). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, S. A., & Veenendall, T. L. (1996). Earthtalk: Communication empowerment for environmental action (Praeger series in political communication). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcott, T. H., & Williams, A. (2013). The challenges for science journalism in the UK. Progress in Physical Geography, 37(2), 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechushtai, E. (2018). Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure? Journalism, 19(8), 1043–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., et al. (2015). Governance traps in climate change politics: Re-framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 535–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Ellithorpe, M. (2014). Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 24(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, G. (2008). Yrke på glid – om journalistrollens deprofessionalisering [Profession in transition – On the deprofessionalisation of journalism]. Stockholm: Institutet för Mediestudier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olausson, U. (2018). “Stop blaming the cows!”: How livestock production is legitimized in everyday discourse on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J., Kristiansen, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). How ‘digital-born’ media cover climate change in comparison to legacy media: A case study of the COP 21 summit in Paris. Global Environmental Change, 48, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W. (2018). YouTubers’ networking activities during the 2016 South Korea earthquake. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poberezhskaya, M. (2018). Blogging about climate change in Russia: Activism, scepticism and conspiracies. Environmental Communication, 12(7), 942–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and placeless-ness. London: Pion Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovaara, I. (2016). Participatory maps: Digital cartographies and the new ecology of journalism. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 827–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2013). Does the city have speech? Public Culture, 25(2 70), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. A., & Park, H. W. (2018). Climate change and YouTube: Deliberation potential in post-video discussions. Environmental Communication, 12(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. B., et al. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøvaag, H., & Ohlsson, J. (2019). Media ownership and journalism. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2013). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2017). Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice. Urban Studies, 54(1), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2010). Narratives of identity and place. Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (2005). The new visibility. Theory Culture Society, 22(6), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, World Commission on the Environment and Development (WCED). (1992). The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizcarrondo, T. (2013). Measuring concentration of media ownership: 1976–2009. JMM: The International Journal on Media Management, 15(3), 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattchow, B. (2013). Landscape and a sense of place: A creative tension. In P. Howard et al. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 87–96). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiik, J., & Nygren, G. (2016). Den journalistiska professionen i nätverksamhället. In O. Westerlund (Ed.), Människorna, medierna och marknaden: medieutredningens forskningsantologi om en demokrati i förändring (pp. 261–282). Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1975). The long revolution. Westport: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. L., & Brandt, E. A. (2013). Sense of place, identity, and cultural continuity in an Arizona community. In P. N. Goggin (Ed.), Environmental rhetoric and ecologies of place (pp. 58–69). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2001). Theorizing business citizenship. In J. Andriof & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 83–116). London: Greenleaf.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Public Law, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

    Joana Díaz-Pont

  2. Department of Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Annika Egan Sjölander

  3. School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Kerrie Foxwell-Norton

  4. Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (Manipal University), Manipal, India

    Maitreyee Mishra

  5. Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Pieter Maeseele

Authors
  1. Joana Díaz-Pont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annika Egan Sjölander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerrie Foxwell-Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maitreyee Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pieter Maeseele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Díaz-Pont .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Public Law, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

    Joana Díaz-Pont

  2. Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Pieter Maeseele

  3. Department of Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Annika Egan Sjölander

  4. Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (Manipal University), Manipal, India

    Maitreyee Mishra

  5. School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Kerrie Foxwell-Norton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Díaz-Pont, J., Egan Sjölander, A., Foxwell-Norton, K., Mishra, M., Maeseele, P. (2020). Environmental Communication in the Intertwining of the Local and the Digital. In: Díaz-Pont, J., Maeseele, P., Egan Sjölander, A., Mishra, M., Foxwell-Norton, K. (eds) The Local and the Digital in Environmental Communication. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37330-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation