Advertisement

Transforming Heritage Crafts to Engaging Digital Experiences

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

Heritage Crafts (HCs) involve craft artefacts, materials, and tools and encompass craftsmanship as a form of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Intangible HC dimensions include dexterity, know-how, and skilled use of tools, as well as identity and traditions of the communities in which craftsmanship is, or was, practiced. HCs are part of history and have impact upon the economy of the areas in which they flourish. Despite their cultural significance, efforts towards HC digital representation and presentation are scattered. In this chapter, as a first step towards the Representation and Presentation of Heritage Crafts as cultural heritage (CH), pertinent requirements and needed technological components are investigated. Representation is expected to capture the wide spectrum of knowledge that a HC covers, from objects and their making, to hand gestures and tool uses that define craft motor skills, to the societal value, economic impact, and historical significance of HCs. Presentation is expected to address the need of exploiting Representation to conserve cultural resources, contribute to their accurate interpretation, provide essential and authentic experiences, as well as stimulate revenues of cultural resources through thematic tourism. This chapter lays the foundations and envisions the further development and formalisation of a suitable approach to HC representation and presentation in the form of a generic protocol that together with the appropriate technological tools can be applied to any HC instance.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter reports research work conducted in the context of the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 822336 (Mingei).

References

  1. 3D-ICONS (2014) Guidelines & case studies. 3D-ICONS is a project funded under the European Commission’s ICT Policy Support Programme, project no. 297194Google Scholar
  2. Aloia N, Concordia C, Meghini C (2011) Europeana v1. 0. In: Italian research conference on digital libraries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 127–129Google Scholar
  3. ARCO (Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects) consortium (2003). http://www.arco-web.org
  4. Arnold D, Geser G (2008) EPOCH research agenda for the applications of ICT to cultural heritage. EPOCH projectGoogle Scholar
  5. Aylett R, Vala M, Sequeira P, Paiva A (2007) FearNot!—an emergent narrative approach to virtual dramas for anti-bullying education. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 4871:202–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77039-8_19
  6. Barra G (2012) Chinese craft project, Politecnico Di Milano, M.Sc. thesisGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley K (2006) Risks associated with the use of recordable CDs and DVDs as reliable storage media in archival collections: strategies and alternativesGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley K, Lei J, Blackall C (2007) Memory of the world: towards an open source repository and preservation system. In: Conference: meeting of the international advisory committee of the memory of the world programme, Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  9. Brigante C, Abbate N, Basile A, Faulisi A, Sessa S (2011) Towards miniaturization of a MEMS-based wearable motion capture system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(8):3234–3241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks KM (1996) Do story agents use rocking chairs? The theory and implementation of one model for computational narrative. In: ACM Mutlimedia ’96, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosseau K, Choquette M, Renaud L (2006) Digitization standards for the Canadian Museum of Civilization Corporation. Version 1.1Google Scholar
  12. Campbell JC, Hays MJ, Core M, Birth M, Bosack M, Clark RE (2011) Interpersonal and leadership skills: using virtual humans to teach new officers. In: Proceedings of interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference (I/ITSEC). IITSECGoogle Scholar
  13. Camurri A, Canepa C, Ferrari N, Mancini M, Niewiadomski R, Piana S, Volpe G, Matos J-M, Palacio P, Romero M (2016) A system to support the learning of movement qualities in dance: a case study on dynamic symmetry. In: BodySenseUX workshop, held in conjunction with UBICOMPGoogle Scholar
  14. Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S, Sheikh Y (2017) Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In: Proceedings of CVPRGoogle Scholar
  15. CARLI Digital Collections Users’ Group (2016) Guidelines for the creation of digital collections. Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries at the University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  16. Carmel D, Zwerdling N, Yogev S (2012) Entity oriented search and exploration for cultural heritage collections: the EU cultura project. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web, pp 227–230. ACMGoogle Scholar
  17. Clough P, Ford N, Stevenson M (2011) Personalizing access to cultural heritage collections using pathways. In: International workshop on personalized access to cultural heritageGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Andrea A, Niccolucci F, Bassett S, Fernie K (2012) 3D-ICONS: world heritage sites for Europeana: Making complex 3D models available to everyone. In: 2012 18th international conference on virtual systems and multimedia. IEEE, pp 517–520Google Scholar
  19. De Polo A (2011) Digital environment for cultural interfaces: promoting heritage education and research. In: Proceedings of museums and the web 2011. Arch Mus Inform. TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. Dennett D (1988) Quining Qualia. In: Marcel A, Bisiach E (eds) Consciousness in modern science, Oxford University Press. In: Lycan W (ed) (1990) Mind and cognition: a reader. MIT Press (Reprinted). In: Goldman (ed) (1993) Readings in philosophy and cognitive science. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  21. DeVault D, Artstein R, Benn G, Dey T, Fast E, Gainer A, Georgila K, Gratch J, Hartholt A, Lhommet M, Lucas G, Marsella S, Morbini F, Nazarian A, Scherer S, Stratou G, Suri A, Traum D, Wood R, Xu Y, Rizzo A, Morency L-P (2014) SimSensei Kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. IEEE, pp 1061–1068Google Scholar
  22. Dimitropoulos K et al (2018) A multimodal approach for the safeguarding and transmission of intangible cultural heritage: the case of i-Treasures. IEEE Intell Syst 33(6):3–16Google Scholar
  23. Dimitropoulos K, Manitsaris S, Tsalakanidou F, Nikolopoulos S, Denby B, Al Kork S, Tilmanne J et al (2014) Capturing the intangible an introduction to the i-Treasures project. In: 2014 international conference on computer vision theory and applications (VISAPP), vol 2. IEEE, pp 773–781Google Scholar
  24. Doerr M (2003) The CIDOC conceptual reference model: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag 24(3):75–92Google Scholar
  25. Doerr M, Gradmann S, Hennicke S, Isaac A, Meghini C, van de Sompel H (2010) The Europeana data model (EDM). In: World library and information congress: 76th IFLA general conference and assembly, pp 10–15Google Scholar
  26. Donkin L (2001) Crafts and conservation. Synthesis report for ICCROMGoogle Scholar
  27. Doulamis Anastasios D et al (2017) Transforming intangible folkloric performing arts into tangible choreographic digital objects: the terpsichore approach. In: Proceedings of VISIGRAPP (5: VISAPP)Google Scholar
  28. Doulamis N et al (2017) Modelling of static and moving objects: digitizing tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Mixed reality and gamification for cultural heritage. Springer, Cham, pp 567–589Google Scholar
  29. ETH-Bibliothek (2016) Best practices digitization (Version 1.1, 2016)Google Scholar
  30. Fast-Berglund Å, Gong L, Li D (2018) Testing and validating extended reality (xR) technologies in manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 25:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernie K, Griffiths J, Archer P, Chandrinos K, de Polo A, Stevenson M, Lopez de Lacalle, O et al (2012) PATHS: personalising access to cultural heritage spaces. In: 2012 18th international conference on virtual systems and multimedia (VSMM). IEEE, pp 469–474Google Scholar
  32. Geijer A (1979) A history of textile art. Pasold Research Fund, p 141Google Scholar
  33. Gervás P, Dìaz-Agudo B, Peinado F, Hervás R (2005) Story plot generation based on cbr. Knowl Based Syst 18(4):235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giannoulakis S, Tsapatsoulis N, Grammalidis N (2018) Metadata for intangible cultural heritage: the case of folk dancesGoogle Scholar
  35. Giaretta D (2008) The CASPAR approach to digital preservation. Int J Digit Curation 2(1)Google Scholar
  36. Hall T, Ciolfi L, Fraser M, Benford S, Bowers J, Greenhalgh C, Hellstrom S, Izadi S, Schnadelbach H (2001) The visitor as virtual archaeologist: using mixed reality technology to enhance education and social interaction in the museum. In: Spencer S (ed) Proceedings of the VAST 2001 conference, Greece, Nov 2001. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hecht A (1989) The art of the loom. British Museum PublGoogle Scholar
  38. Hughes CE, Stapleton CB, Hughes DE, Smith E (2005) Mixed reality in education, entertainment and training: an interdisciplinary approach. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26(6):24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IFLA/UNESCO (1999) Survey on digitisation and preservation. Emerald Group Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jennings H (2012) Towards a definition of heritage craft, creative & cultural skillsGoogle Scholar
  41. Jung Y, Kuijper A, Fellner DW, Kipp M, Miksatko J, Gratch J, Thalmann D (2011a) Believable virtual characters in human-computer dialogs. Eurographics (STARs) 2011:75–100Google Scholar
  42. Jung Y, Kuijper A, Fellner D et al (2011) Believable virtual characters in human-computer dialogs. Eurographics 2011—state of the art report, pp 75–100Google Scholar
  43. Kalay Y, Kvan T, Affleck J (eds) (2007) New heritage: new media and cultural heritage. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Kasnesis P, Kogias DG, Toumanidis L, Xevgenis MG, Patrikakis CZ, Giunta G, Calsi GL (2019) An IoE architecture for the preservation of the cultural heritage: the STORM use case. In: Harnessing the internet of everything (IoE) for accelerated innovation opportunities. IGI Global, pp 193–214Google Scholar
  45. Lagoze C, Hunter J (2006) The ABC ontology and model. J Digit Inf 2(2)Google Scholar
  46. Liarokapis F, White M (2005) Augmented reality techniques for museum environments. Mediterranean J Comput Netw 1(2):90–96Google Scholar
  47. Liu H, Singh P (2002) Makebelieve: using commonsense knowledge to generate stories. In: Proceedings of AAAI/IAAI, pp 957–958Google Scholar
  48. Mani I (2012) Computational modeling of narrative. Synth Lect Hum Lang Technol 5(3):142Google Scholar
  49. Margetis G, Papagiannakis G, Stephanidis C (2019) Realistic natural interaction with virtual statues in X-reality environments. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 42(2/W11)Google Scholar
  50. Markowitz S (1994) The distinction between art and craft. J Aesthetic Educ 28(1):55–70Google Scholar
  51. Metcalf B (1993) Replacing the myth of modernism. American CraftGoogle Scholar
  52. Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst. Special issue on Net- worked Reality E77-D (12):1321–1329Google Scholar
  53. Minerva Project Editorial Board (Minerva Project 2003–11). Last revision 2005-09-12. www.minervaeurope.org/structure/nrg/documents/charterparma.htm
  54. Mulholland P, Collins T (2002) Using digital narratives to support the collaborative learning and exploration of cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of 13th international workshop on database and expert systems applications. IEEE, pp 527–531Google Scholar
  55. Neudecker C, Tzadok A (2010) User collaboration for improving access to historical texts. Lib Q 20(1)Google Scholar
  56. Pratikakis I, Savelonas MA, Mavridis P, Papaioannou G, Sfikas K, Arnaoutoglou F, Rieke-Zapp D (2018) Predictive digitisation of cultural heritage objects. Multimed Tools Appl 77(10):12991–13021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pujol L, Roussou M, Poulou S, Balet O, Vayanou M, Ioannidis Y (2012) Personalizing interactive digital storytelling in archaeological museums: the CHESS project. In: 40th annual conference of computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. Amsterdam University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Pye D (1968) The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Raimond Y, Abdallah S (2007) The event ontology. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  60. Riedl MO, Young RM (2010) Narrative planning: balancing plot and character. J Artif Intell Res 39(1):217–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sánchez JA, Mühlberger G, Gatos B, Schofield P, Depuydt K, Davis RM, de Does J et al (2013) TranScriptorium: a European project on handwritten text recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on document engineering. ACM, pp 227–228Google Scholar
  62. Scherp A, Franz T, Saathoff C, Staab S (2009) F—a model of events based on the foundational ontology DOLCE+DnS ultralight. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on knowledge capture. ACM, pp 137–144Google Scholar
  63. Scopigno R, Callieri M, Cignoni P, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ponchio F, Ranzuglia G (2011) 3D models for cultural heritage: beyond plain visualization. Computer 7:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw R, Troncy R, Hardman L (2009) Lode: linking open descriptions of events. In: The semantic web. Springer, pp 153–167Google Scholar
  65. Singh P et al (2002) The public acquisition of commonsense knowledge. In: Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium: acquiring (and Using) linguistic (and World) knowledge for information accessGoogle Scholar
  66. Stogner MB (2011) The Immersive cultural museum experience–creating context and story with new media technology. Int J Incl Mus 3(3)Google Scholar
  67. Swartout W, Traum D, Artstein R, Noren D, Debevec P, Bronnenkant K, Williams J, Leuski A, Narayanan S, Piepol D, Lane HC, Morie J, Aggarwal P, Liewer M, Chiang J-Y, Gerten J, Chu S, White K (2010) Virtual museum guides demonstration. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE spoken language technology workshop. IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2236291
  68. Tscheu F, Buhalis D (2016) Augmented reality at cultural heritage sites. In: Information and communication technologies in tourism. Springer, Cham, pp 607–619Google Scholar
  69. UNESCO (2003a) National Library of Australia. Guidelines for the preservation of digital heritage. CI.2003/WS/3Google Scholar
  70. UNESCO (2003b) Text of the convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritageGoogle Scholar
  71. UNESCO (2016) Digitization and online accessibility of cultural content and digital preservation, LatviaGoogle Scholar
  72. van den Akker C, van Erp M, Aroyo L, Segers R, Van der Meij L, Legêne S, Schreiber G (2012) Understanding objects in online museum collections by means of narratives. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on computational models of narrative (CMN’12)Google Scholar
  73. Vico L (2018). Authenticity and realism: virtual vs physical restoration. McDonald InstituteGoogle Scholar
  74. Vossen P, Rigau G, Agirre E, Soroa A, Monachini M, Bartolini R (2010) KYOTO: an open platform for mining facts. In: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on ontologies and lexical resources, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  75. White M, Mourkoussis N, Darcy J, Petridis P, Liarokapis F, Lister PF, Walczak K, Wolciechowski R, Cellary W, Chmielewski J, Stawniak M, Wiza W, Patel M, Stevenson J, Manley J, Giorgini F, Sayd P, Gaspard F (2004) ARCO—an architecture for digitization, management and presentation of virtual exhibitions. In: Proceedings of the CGI’ 2004 conference, Hersonissos, Crete, June 2004, Los Alamitos, California. IEEE Computer Society, pp 622–625Google Scholar
  76. Wolff A, Mulholland P, Collins T (2012) Storyspace: a story-driven approach for creating museum narratives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM conference on hypertext and social media. ACM, pp 89–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceFoundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH)Heraklion, CreteGreece
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of CreteHeraklion, CreteGreece

Personalised recommendations