Skip to main content

Early Twentieth-Century Aspects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Ethics from the 19th Century to Today
  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

By the 1920s, Americans accepted big business. They enjoyed the tide of new consumer goods, especially electric appliances. The new gospel that “ethics pays” gained credence during the early decades of the twentieth century. A concurrent movement was industry self-regulation. Many businesspeople smugly congratulated themselves over the elevated level of business ethics; they characterized the unscrupulous as petty vendors, who would never prosper because of the forces of competition and industry self-regulation. Complacency regarding business ethics largely dissipated during the Great Depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a revisionist view of the Teapot Dome scandal, see (Libecap 1984, 381–382, 383–390; Stratton 1957, 387–393; Newsweek, December 11, 1944, 38, 40; New York Times, April 22, 1928, 1, 21; Waller 1962, 343, 351–352).

  2. 2.

    Conwell is almost too delicious a pun to pass up in a book on business ethics, but there is no evidence that he was insincere.

  3. 3.

    One wonders how palatable such observations were to early twentieth-century business executives; it seems doubtful that many twenty-first-century businesspeople would entertain such a rigorous precept.

  4. 4.

    The idea that ethics instructors are not necessarily arbiters of right and wrong is useful.

  5. 5.

    For a more recent opinion, see Kleiner (2014, no page numbers).

  6. 6.

    Although the technology changes, almost a century later, many of the same practices still persist.

  7. 7.

    American law enforcement struggled to track serial killers until the 1980s, so the ineffective tracking of fraudsters is not a surprise.

  8. 8.

    These publicized efforts and recurrent stoking of fears were tactics used again and again by do-gooders, such as the Public Broadcasting Stations. Pledge drives rely upon touted successes, Downton Abbey, for instance, and fears of no more Downton Abbey’s, if viewers failed to send in enough money.

  9. 9.

    For the futility of some regulatory acts, see Tedlow (1981, 53–54); Handler (1939, 91, 97).

  10. 10.

    Illinois probably leads the nation in the number of its ex-governors serving time in prison, four of the last seven.

  11. 11.

    Had the muckrakers been around in 1928, they might have characterized Insull’s efforts as “Robber baron with a smile.”

  12. 12.

    Presumably small investors would have faced a learning curve. Today’s small investor, having access to mutual funds and index funds, might fare better.

  13. 13.

    This resembles the Enron collapse 80 years later.

  14. 14.

    Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis was among those bemoaning an alleged bank trust (centered in New York). After much political posturing and a lengthy court case led by Roosevelt lackey Arsene Pujo, Presiding Judge Harold Medina dismissed the case with prejudice and scolded the government attorneys. Historian Vincent Carosso detailed the ill-founded allegations, politically motivated of course (Carosso 1973, 431–432, but also 423–437; U.S. v. Henry S. Morgan, et al., Corrected Opinion of Harold R. Medina, 3:63; Hofstadter 1965, 215; U.S. Congress 1912, L:4931). It is probably redundant to mention that 2016 Presidential candidate Bernard Sanders voiced concerns about Wall Street bankers’ undue influence; again, such concerns are easy to understand and may be true this time around. Espouse a conspiracy theory enough times and one time it will stick.

Bibliography

  • Abend, Gabriel. The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balleisen, Edward. “Private Cops on the Fraud Beat: The Limits of American Business Self-Regulation, 1895–1932.” Business History Review 83(1), Spring 2009, 113–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, Bruce. The Man Nobody Knows: A Discovery of the Real Jesus (Cutchogue, NY: Buccaneer Books, [1924] 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, Adolf. Power without Property: A New Development in American Political Economy (New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Edward. “Emergence of the Public Relations Counsel: Principles and Recollections.” Business History Review XLV(3), Autumn 1971, 296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carosso, Vincent. “The Wall Street Money Trust from Pujo through Medina.” Business History Review XLVII(4), Winter 1973, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “More Street Car Accommodations Needed.” January 15, 1895a, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Kind to Mr. Yerkes.” January 29, 1895b, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “The Latest Street Railway Ordinance.” January 29, 1895c, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Fraud in the Loop.” September 3, 1895d, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Grabs All in Sight.” December 10, 1895e, 1 and 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Seats or No Fares.” February 21, 1896a, 1 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Gives Mr. Yerkes a New Franchise.” April 29, 1896b, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Yerkes’ Exodus Is Near.” December 27, 1896c, 1 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Yerkes as a Target.” March 11, 1897a, 1 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “New Bill Worse Yet.” March 12, 1897b, 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Board Opposes the Franchise.” December 8, 1898, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Traction Men to Meet.” May 7, 1899a, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Overhead Trolley Not the Issue.” May 11, 1899b, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “Nine Hurt in Trolley Crash.” July 2, 1899c, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Tribune. “First and Last Days of State Street Cable Line.” July 2, 1899d, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conwell, Russell. “Acres of Diamonds.” AmericanRhetoric.com. 2010.

  • Cowing, Cedric. “Market Speculation in the Muckraker Era: The Popular Reaction.” Business History Review XXXI(4), Winter 1957, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, William. “The Increase of Gambling and Its Forms.” Forum XII(2), October 1891, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrul, Ernest. “Business Ethics and Balance Sheets.” Nation’s Business 14(2), February 1926, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering News and American Railway Journal. “Council Report on the Street Railways of Chicago.” Vol. XL, No. 16, October 20, 1898, 246–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filene, Edward. Morals in Business (Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Burton and Stephen Withey. Big Business as the People See It (Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, John. “Dishonest Business.” Forum 82(6), December 1929, 351–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Donald. America’s Economic Moralists: A History of Rival Ethics and Economics (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman. Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gras, Norman. “Shifts in Public Relations.” Bulletin of the Business Historical Society 19(4), October 1945, 97–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Hardy. The Company Town: The Industrial Edens and Satanic Mills That Shaped the American Economy (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, Rev. Charles Hunter. “Gambling and Speculation: A Symposium.” Arena XI(2), February 1895, 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, Milton. “The Control of False Advertising under the Wheeler-Lea Act.” Law and Contemporary Problems 6(1), Winter 1939. 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Richard. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965), 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, Herbert. “If Business Doesn’t, Government Will.” Nation’s Business 12(7), June 5, 1924, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huertas, Thomas and Joan Silverman. “Charles E. Mitchell: Scapegoat of the Crash?” Business History Review 60 (Spring 1986), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent. “Confessions of a Stock Speculator.” Vol. 52, March 21, 1907, 669–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insull, Samuel. Public Utilities in Modern Life: Selected Speeches, 1914–1923, edited by William Keily (Chicago, IL: Privately Printed, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Ira and Jane Nelson. Profits with Principles: Seven Strategies for Delivering Value with Values (New York, NY: Currency Doubleday, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, [1998] 2016). Revised edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Julius. “The Dividends of Honesty in Business.” Forum 83(3), March 1930, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, Morris. “Why License a Florist?” New York Times, May 28, 2014, no pages. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/29/opinion/why-license-a-florist.html. Viewed March 4, 2018, 3:05pm.

  • Law, Marc and Sukkoo Kim. “Specialization and Regulation: The Rise of Professionals and the Emergence of Occupational Licensing Regulation.” Journal of Economic History 65(3), September 2005, 723–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, Gary. “The Political Allocation of Mineral Rights: A Re-Evaluation of Teapot Dome.” Journal of Economic History 44(2), June 1984, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Literary Digest. “Mitchell’s Acquittal and the Banking Administration.” July 1, 1933, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Donald. Economic Virtues in the United States: A History and an Interpretation (New York, NY: Arno Press, [1930] 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Forrest. “Samuel Insull and the Movement for State Utility Regulatory Commissions.” Business History Review XXXXI(3), Autumn 1958, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Mark and J. Harold Mulherin. “Finessing the Political System: The Cigarette Advertising Ban.” Southern Economic Journal 54(4), April 1988, 855–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation’s Business. “Judge Gary Believes That Our Business Ethics Are Improving.” August 1922, 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. “Sinclair Acquitted of Oil Lease Fraud; Jury Out 2 Hours.” April 22, 1928, 1 and 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. “Glass Assails Mitchell for Bank’s Aid to Market; Stocks Up in Buying Rush.” March 29, 1929a, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. “Money Crisis Past, Mitchell Asserts.” March 29, 1929b, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. “Congress Inquiry Likely into Stock Speculation; Mitchell Explains Stand.” March 30, 1929c, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek. “The Record Stands.” December 11, 1944, 38 and 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, Francis. The Christian Life in the Modern World (New York, NY: Macmillan, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Virgil. Barbarians in Our Midst: A History of Chicago Crime and Politics (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, Anthony. “A Cigarette Campaign under Fire,” New York Times, January 12, 1990, D1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, David. “The Found Generation.” Abundance for What?: And Other Essays (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964), 309–323..

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Sidney. “Portrait of a Robber Baron: Charles T. Yerkes.” Business History Review XXXV(3), Autumn 1961, 344–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Elmo. “The Public Looks at Business,” Harvard Business Review, XXVII, March 1949, 165–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Thomas and William Danko. The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America’s Wealthy (Atlanta, GA: Longstreet Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Alexandra. “Online Investors In China Lose Billions.” New York Times, January 29, 2018, B1 and B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, David. “Behind Teapot Dome: Some Personal Insights.” Business History Review XXXI(4), Winter 1957, 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Arthur. “Losses to the Public in the Insull Collapse, 1932–1946.” Business History Review XXXVI(2), Summer 1962, 188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlow, Richard. “From Competitor to Consumer: The Changing Focus of Federal Regulation of Advertising, 1914–1938.” Business History Review 55(1), Spring 1981. 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Time. “Business and Finance: Troubles of Mitchell.” November 18, 1929, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States of America, plaintiff, against Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants (New York, NY: Record Press, 1950–1954), 3 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. v. Henry S. Morgan, et al., “Corrected Opinion of Harold R. Medina.” (New York, NY: 1954?).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Congressional Record: Containing the Proceedings and Debates of the Sixty-Third Congress, First Session. Vol. L (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Congressional Record: Containing the Proceedings and Debates of the Sixty-Third Congress, Second Session. 63rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Vol. LI (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal. “Schools of Business and Journalism.” October 10, 1903, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, Robert. “Business and the Initiation of the Teapot Dome Investigation.” Business History Review XXXVI(3), Autumn 1962, 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Kenneth. “Clearing the Airwaves: The Cigarette Ad Ban Revisited.” Policy Analysis 5(4), Fall 1979, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ways, Max. “Postwar Advance of the Five Hundred Million.” Fortune, LXX(2), August 1964, 104–109 and 212–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, William. The Organization Man (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David George Surdam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Surdam, D.G. (2020). Early Twentieth-Century Aspects. In: Business Ethics from the 19th Century to Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37169-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37169-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37168-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37169-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics