Modeling an Augmented Reality Game Environment to Enhance Behavior of ADHD Patients

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11976)


The paper generically models an augmented reality game-based environment to project the gamification of an online cognitive behavioral therapist that performs instant measurements for patients with a predefined Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ADHD is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in which patients have difficulties related to inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Those patients are in need for a psychological therapy; the use of cognitive behavioral therapy as a firmly-established treatment is to help in enhancing the way they think and behave. A major limitation in traditional cognitive behavioral therapies is that therapists may face difficulty to optimize patients’ neuropsychological stimulus following a specified treatment plan, i.e., therapists struggle to draw clear images when stimulating patients’ mind-set to a point where they should be. Other limitations recognized here include availability, accessibility and level-of-experience of the therapists. Therefore, the paper present a gamification model, we term as “AR-Therapist,” in order to take advantages of augmented reality developments to engage patients in both real and virtual game-based environments. The model provides an on-time measurements of patients’ progress throughout the treatment sessions which, in result, overcomes limitations observed in traditional cognitive behavioral therapies.


Gamification ADHD Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Augmented Reality 



This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Albaha University, Saudi Arabia [grant number: 1439/4]. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deanship of Scientific Research or Albaha University.


  1. 1.
    Abikoff, H., Courtney, M., Pelham, W.E., Koplewicz, H.S.: Teachers’ ratings of disruptive behaviors: the influence of halo effects. J. Abnormal Child Psychol. 21(5), 519–533 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkley, R.A.: The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessment methods of ADHD symptoms. J. Abnormal Child Psychol. 19(2), 149–178 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beard, L., Wilson, K., Morra, D., Keelan, J.: A survey of health-related activities on second life. J. Med. Internet Res. 11(2), e17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben-Moussa, M., Rubo, M., Debracque, C., Lange, W.G.: DJINNI: a novel technology supported exposure therapy paradigm for SAD combining virtual reality and augmented reality. Front. Psychiatry 8, 26 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bickmore, T.W., Mitchell, S.E., Jack, B.W., Paasche-Orlow, M.K., Pfeifer, L.M., O’Donnell, J.: Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms. Interact. Comput. 22(4), 289–298 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biederman, J.: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a selective overview. Biol. Psychiatry 57(11), 1215–1220 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A survey of augmented reality. Found. Trends® Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8(2–3), 73–272 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burdea, G.C., Coiffet, P.: Virtual Reality Technology. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan, E., Wang, D., Pasquier, M.: Towards intelligent self-care: multi-sensor monitoring and neuro-fuzzy behavior modelling. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 3083–3088, October 2008Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, G., Morreale, P., Medicherla, P.: Applications of augmented reality systems in education. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 1380–1385. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Climent, G., Banterla, F., Iriarte, Y.: Aula: Theoretical Manual. Nesplora, San Sebastian (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conners, C.K., Staff, M., Connelly, V., Campbell, S., MacLean, M., Barnes, J.: Conners’ continuous performance Test II (CPT II v. 5). Multi-Health Syst. Inc. 29, 175–196 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edwards, M.C., Gardner, E.S., Chelonis, J.J., Schulz, E.G., Flake, R.A., Diaz, P.F.: Estimates of the validity and utility of the conners’ continuous performance test in the assessment of inattentive and/or hyperactive-impulsive behaviors in children. J. Abnormal Child Psychol. 35(3), 393–404 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foroughi, H., Aski, B.S., Pourreza, H.: Intelligent video surveillance for monitoring fall detection of elderly in home environments. In: 2008 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pp. 219–224, December 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gorini, A., Gaggioli, A., Vigna, C., Riva, G.: A second life for ehealth: prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J. Med. Internet Res. 10(3), e21 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall, C.L., et al.: The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 25(7), 677–699 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyerbröker, K., Emmelkamp, P.M.: Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a systematic review of process-and-outcome studies. Depression Anxiety 27(10), 933–944 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morales-Hidalgo, P., Hernández-Martínez, C., Vera, M., Voltas, N., Canals, J.: Psychometric properties of the conners-3 and conners early childhood indexes in a Spanish school population. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 17(1), 85–96 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Negut, A., Jurma, A.M., David, D.: Virtual-reality-based attention assessment of ADHD: ClinicaVR: Classroom-CPT versus a traditional continuous performance test. Child Neuropsychol. 23(6), 692–712 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parsons, T.D., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter, J.G., Rizzo, A.A.: A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychol. 13(4), 363–381 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parsons, T.D., Rizzo, A.A., Rogers, S., York, P.: Virtual reality in paediatric rehabilitation: a review. Dev. Neurorehabilitation 12(4), 224–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rapport, M.D., Chung, K.M., Shore, G., Denney, C.B., Isaacs, P.: Upgrading the science and technology of assessment and diagnosis: laboratory and clinic-based assessment of children with ADHD. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 29(4), 555–568 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodríguez, C., Areces, D., García, T., Cueli, M., González-Castro, P.: Comparison between two continuous performance tests for identifying ADHD: traditional vs. virtual reality. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 18(3), 254–263 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogt, C., Williams, T.: Early identification of stimulant treatment responders, partial responders and non-responders using objective measures in children and adolescents with hyperkinetic disorder. Child Adolesc. Mental Health 16(3), 144–149 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAlbaha UniversityAlbahaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations