Abstract
The final chapter of the book takes stock of Sumner’s achievements to date, making some concluding observations about the nature of Sumner’s oeuvre and its contemporary significance. It considers Sumner’s work as a cumulative project, his long-standing commitment to theory, his relationship to Marxism, his belief that a thoroughgoing moral renewal of society has become necessary and his somewhat uneven influence in the discipline. The chapter concludes by suggesting that, in a fracturing late modernity where censoriousness has reached a new pitch, Sumner’s work is more relevant than ever.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Amusingly, this is redolent of Goode’s (2002: 114–5) view that deviance was being “obliterated by incorporation”!
- 2.
As Eagleton (1996: 19) reflected of this period, “I have spoken of symptoms of political defeat; but what if this defeat never happened in the first place? What if it were less a matter of the left rising up and being forced back, than a steady disintegration, a gradual failure of nerve, a creeping paralysis? What if the confrontation never quite took place, but people behaved as though it did? As though someone were to display all the symptoms of rabies, but had never been within biting distance of a mad dog.” Scholars who continued to use the Marxist label during this period tended to do so as a vague term of political reference that also situated one’s work in an intellectual tradition (Tushnet 1980: 123); for instance, Wright (2003: 19) felt that “what was really at stake to me was the nature of the constituency or audience to whom I wanted to feel accountable”. Simultaneously, there can be little doubt that Marxism was quickly becoming increasingly incomprehensible to the students of the day; as Roberts (2017: 41) put it, they were very much “Thatcher’s children!”
- 3.
Ultra realism (see, e.g. Hall et al. 2008; Winlow and Atkinson 2012; Hall 2012; Hall and Winlow 2015, 2018) has an interesting relationship with the work of Sumner. Sumner championed the early work of Hall, as Hall has acknowledged (Hall et al. 2008: xiii). Later, as we have seen, Hall and Winlow invited Sumner to contribute to their New Directions in Criminological Theory collection, describing his concept of social censure as “a useful home-grown idea unwisely neglected by criminology’s narrowband mainstream” (2012: 11). Despite this, ultra realist works very rarely refer to Sumner despite sharing a somewhat bleak view of late modern capitalism. Indeed, Horsley (2014a) has criticised Sumner’s work for helping to shift the focus of the discipline away from the issue of motivation. Yet Sumner has always insisted that because the social world generates offensive behaviours as well as perceptions of offensiveness, crime and deviance are always “doubly socially constructed” (2004a: 6); on this view crime and deviance can be seen “as practical or behavioural responses to social conditions and as social censures reflecting the emotions, ideologies, and values of powerful social groups” (2004a: 9). Ultra realists would presumably concur with the idea that “the practices of offenders also reflect social tensions, and express particular political and ideological interpretations of those tensions. As Engels made clear in 1844, these responses are not necessarily any more or less progressive than those of legislators or the police. […] We may, indeed, all agree, in some cases, that they are instances of practices that we thoroughly deplore” (1990d: 46). Furthermore, if ultra realism seeks to understand how, in advanced capitalism, “the competitive individual gauges her success relative to the downfall and subjugation of others” (Hall and Winlow 2018), then censure theory might assist in understanding how these subjugations are realised. Horsley missed these potential points of articulation between Sumner and ultra realism. Nevertheless, Sumner charitably published a version of Horsley’s argument on CrimeTalk (Horsley 2014b).
- 4.
The debate on whether Marx thought capitalism unjust, briefly summarised in Moxon (2013: 45–6), is a fine example of the difficulties that abound when such issues are engaged with.
- 5.
For example, there is no mention whatsoever of Sumner in some criminology textbooks, such as the otherwise remarkably comprehensive Criminology by Newburn (2013), and in works that focus on Marxism and criminology (see, e.g., Cowling 2008). Even several chapters in Sumner’s own festschrift (Amatrudo 2017a) do not mention him or utilise his ideas!
References
Amatrudo, A. (Ed.). (2017a). Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Amatrudo, A. (2017b). Two accounts of censure. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 93–114). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson, P. (1980). Arguments within English Marxism. London: Verso.
Chan, G. H., & Wing Lo, T. (2017). The social censure of hidden youth in Hong Kong. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 139–189). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cowling, M. (2008). Marxism and criminological theory: A critique and a toolkit. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downes, D., & Rock, P. (2007). Understanding deviance: A guide to the sociology of crime and rule breaking (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagleton, T. (1996). The illusions of postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eagleton, T. (2016). Materialism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Elster, J. (1986). An introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farmer, L. (2017). Censure: Moral and sociological. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 47–65). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Garland, D. (1998). Review of Bergalli and Sumner’s Social control and political order. British Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 321–324.
Goode, E. (2002). Does the death of the sociology of deviance make sense. The American Sociologist, 33(3), 116–128.
Hall, S. (2012). Theorizing crime and deviance: A new perspective. London: Sage.
Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2012). Introduction: The need for new directions in criminological theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Revitalizing criminological theory: Towards a new ultra-realism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2018). Ultra realism. In W. S. DeKeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (pp. 43–56). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hall, S., Winlow, S., & Ancrum, C. (2008). Criminal identities and consumer culture: Crime, exclusion and the new culture of narcissism. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Horsley, M. (2014a). The ‘death of deviance’ and stagnation of twentieth century criminology. In M. Dellwing, J. A. Kotarba, & N. W. Pino (Eds.), The death and resurrection of deviance: Current ideas and research (pp. 85–107). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Horsley, M. (2014b). Censure and motivation: Re-balancing criminological theory. CrimeTalk. Retrieved from http://crimetalk.org.uk/index.php/library/section-list/933-censure-motivation.
Lippens, R. (2017). Sensure? Public art, territorial coding, and censure. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 333–350). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lukes, S. (1985). Marxism and morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moxon, D. (2011). Marxism and the definition of crime. In-Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 5(2), 102–120.
Moxon, D. (2013). Marxist criminology: Whose side, which values? In M. Cowburn, M. Duggan, & A. Robinson (Eds.), Values in criminology and community justice (pp. 39–55). London: Policy Press.
Moxon, D. (2017). What is crime, what is deviance? Reflections on the development and contemporary relevance of Sumner’s notion of social censure. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 303–331). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Newburn, T. (2013). Criminology (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
O’Neill, M. (2017). Sex work, censure and transgression. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 191–215). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reiner, R. (2012a). Casino capital’s crimes: Political economy, crime and criminal justice. In M. McGuire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (5th ed., pp. 301–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reiner, R. (2012b). Political economy and criminology: The return of the repressed. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 30–51). Abingdon: Routledge.
Reiner, R. (2016). Crime: The mystery of the common sense concept. Cambridge: Polity.
Reiner, R. (2017). Political economy, crime, and criminal justice. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed., pp. 116–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, P. (1993). Social control and the censure(s) of sex. Crime, Law and Social Change, 19(2), 171–186.
Roberts, P. (2017). Thinking through critical criminology. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 1–45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Roemer, J. (1988). Free to lose: An introduction to Marxist economic philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sumner, C. (1976). Ideology and deviance. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
Sumner, C. (1979). Reading ideologies: An investigation into the Marxist theory of ideology and law. London: Academic Press.
Sumner, C. (1981). The rule of law and civil rights in contemporary Marxist theory. Kapitalistate: Working Papers on the Capitalist State, 9, 63–91.
Sumner, C. (1983). Law, legitimation and the advanced capitalist state: The jurisprudence and social theory of Jurgen Habermas. In D. Sugarman (Ed.), Legality, ideology and the state (pp. 119–158). London: Academic Press.
Sumner, C. (1990a). Series’ editor’s introduction. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. xi–xii). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1990b). Introduction: Contemporary socialist criminology. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. 1–12). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1990c). Rethinking deviance: Towards a sociology of censure. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. 15–40). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1990d). Reflections on a sociological theory of criminal justice systems. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Censure, politics and criminal justice (pp. 41–56). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1991). Ideology and law: Some reflections on postmodernist sociology and the ideological character of criminal justice. In R. Bergalli (Ed.), Sociology of penal control within the framework of the sociology of law (pp. 47–77). Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law: Onati Proceedings Vol. 10.
Sumner, C. (1994). The sociology of deviance: An obituary. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sumner, C. (1997a). The decline of social control and the rise of vocabularies of struggle. In R. Bergalli & C. Sumner (Eds.), Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century (pp. 131–150). London: Sage.
Sumner, C. (1997b). Introduction: The violence of censure and the censure of violence. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Violence, culture and censure (pp. 1–6). London: Taylor and Francis.
Sumner, C. (Ed.). (2004a). The Blackwell companion to criminology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sumner, C. (2004b). The social nature of crime and deviance. In C. Sumner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to criminology (pp. 3–31). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sumner, C. (2006). Censure, criminology and politics. In I. Rivera, H. C. Silveira, E. Bodelon, & A. Recasens (Eds.), Contornos y pliegues del derecho: Homenaje a Roberto Bergalli (pp. 140–146). Barcelona: Anthropos.
Sumner, C. (2012a). Censure, culture and political economy: Beyond the death of deviance debate. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 165–180). Abingdon: Routledge.
Sumner, C. (2012b). Media, policing and politics (part 2). CrimeTalk, 9 March. Retrieved from https://www.crimetalk.org.uk/index.php/library/editors-blog/698-media-policing-and-politics-part-2.
Sumner, C. (2014). Measure for measure: Justice in the society of censure. In M. V. Jacobsen (Ed.), The poetics of crime: Understanding and researching crime and deviance through creative sources (pp. 97–118). Farnham: Ashgate.
Sumner, C. (2015). Paper at Colin Sumner: The critical left and criminology. Seminar, Middlesex University, 26 March.
Sumner, C. (2017). A new paradigm in criminology: Censure, harm and pathology. Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner book launch event, University of Nottingham, 10 November.
Tierney, J. (2010). Criminology: Theory and context (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Tombs, S. (2017). Mitigating and responding to corporate violence: Beyond crime and criminology. In A. Amatrudo (Ed.), Social censure and critical criminology: After Sumner (pp. 217–245). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tushnet, M. (1980). Review of Cain and Hunt’s Marx and Engels on law, Hirst’s On law and ideology, and Sumner’s Reading ideologies. British Journal of Law and Society, 7(1), 122–126.
Winlow, S., & Atkinson, R. (Eds.). (2012). New directions in crime and deviancy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wright, E. O. (2003). Falling into Marxism; Choosing to stay. In S. Turner & A. Sica (Eds.), The disobedient generation (pp. 325–352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moxon, D. (2020). After Sumner?. In: Colin Sumner . Palgrave Pioneers in Criminology. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36941-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36941-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36940-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36941-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)