Advertisement

Groupthink and the Evolution of Reason Giving

Chapter
  • 532 Downloads

Abstract

Groupthink is a powerful social phenomenon where the experienced momentum of a group takes it to extreme places. Social psychologists have documented the many ways in which group pressures can create conformity and how such “momentum” can result in remarkably poor decisions that fail to take other perspectives into account. Although many variables have been identified, social psychology is lacking a metatheoretical framework that can account for these kinds of human behaviors. This chapter reviews the processes associated with groupthink and then lays out how a new unified theory of psychology can account for the various justification and social influence dynamics that drive groupthink. By being aware of these processes and having an integrative model for understanding them, we will be in a better place to avoid unwise conformity that can have disastrous consequences.

Keywords

Justification hypothesis Tripartite model of human consciousness Groupthink Political correctness Influence matrix 

References

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Henriques, G. R. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henriques, G. R. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henriques, G. R. (2017, August). A moral compass for troubling times. Theory of Knowledge on Psychology today. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-knowledge/201708/moral-compass-troubling-times.
  7. Lilla, M. (2017). The once and future liberal: After identity politics. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Swanson, G. E. (1988). Ego defenses and the legitimation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Graduate PsychologyJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations