Abstract
Groupthink is a powerful social phenomenon where the experienced momentum of a group takes it to extreme places. Social psychologists have documented the many ways in which group pressures can create conformity and how such “momentum” can result in remarkably poor decisions that fail to take other perspectives into account. Although many variables have been identified, social psychology is lacking a metatheoretical framework that can account for these kinds of human behaviors. This chapter reviews the processes associated with groupthink and then lays out how a new unified theory of psychology can account for the various justification and social influence dynamics that drive groupthink. By being aware of these processes and having an integrative model for understanding them, we will be in a better place to avoid unwise conformity that can have disastrous consequences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Henriques, G. R. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182.
Henriques, G. R. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.
Henriques, G. R. (2017, August). A moral compass for troubling times. Theory of Knowledge on Psychology today. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-knowledge/201708/moral-compass-troubling-times.
Lilla, M. (2017). The once and future liberal: After identity politics. New York: Harper Collins.
McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.
Swanson, G. E. (1988). Ego defenses and the legitimation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2756
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henriques, G. (2020). Groupthink and the Evolution of Reason Giving. In: Allen, D.M., Howell, J.W. (eds) Groupthink in Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36822-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36822-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36821-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36822-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)