Fake News Identification Based on Sentiment and Frequency Analysis

  • Jozef KapustaEmail author
  • Ľubomír Benko
  • Michal Munk
Conference paper
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 7)


The advent of social networks has changed how can be the thinking of the population influenced. Although the spreading of false information or false messages for personal or political benefit is certainly nothing new, current trends such as social media enable every individual to create false information easier than ever with the spread compared to the leading news portals. Fake news detection has recently attracted growing interest from the general public and researchers. The paper aims to compare basic text characteristics of fake and real news article types. We analysed two datasets that contained a total of 28 870 articles. The results were validated using the third data set consisting of 402 articles. The most important finding is the statistically significant difference in the news sentiment where it has been shown that fake news articles have a more negative sentiment. Also, an interesting result was the difference of average words per sentence. Finding statistically significant differences in individual text characteristics is a piece of important information for the future fake news classifier in terms of selecting the appropriate attributes for classification.


Fake news identification Text mining Sentiment analysis Frequency analysis 



This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and of Slovak Academy of Sciences under the contract VEGA-1/0776/18.

This publication was supported by the Operational Program: Research and Innovation project “Fake news on the Internet - identification, content analysis, emotions”, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.


  1. 1.
    Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–236 (2017). Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Keersmaecker, J., Roets, A.: ‘Fake news’: incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence 65, 107–110 (2017). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jang, S.M., Geng, T., Queenie Li, J.-Y., Xia, R., Huang, C.-T., Kim, H., Tang, J.: A computational approach for examining the roots and spreading patterns of fake news: evolution tree analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 84, 103–113 (2018). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brigida, M., Pratt, W.R.: Fake news. North Am. J. Econ. Finance 42, 564–573 (2017). Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Xu, K., Wang, F., Wang, H., Yang, B.: A first step towards combating fake news over online social media. Presented at the June (2018). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braşoveanu, A.M.P., Andonie, R.: Semantic fake news detection: a machine learning perspective. Presented at the June (2019). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saikh, T., Anand, A., Ekbal, A., Bhattacharyya, P.: A novel approach towards fake news detection: deep learning augmented with textual entailment features. Presented at the June (2019). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agudelo, G.E.R., Parra, O.J.S., Velandia, J.B.: Raising a model for fake news detection using machine learning in Python. Presented at the October (2018). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jane Wakefield: Fake news detector plug-in developed - BBC News.
  11. 11.
    Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: FakeNewsNet: a data repository with news content, social context and spatialtemporal information for studying fake news on social media (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Fake news detection on social media. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 19, 22–36 (2017). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsConstantine the Philosopher University in NitraNitraSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Computer SciencePedagogical University of CracowCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations