Skip to main content

Clustering Model of False Positive Elimination in Moroccan Fiscal Fraud Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019) (AI2SD 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1104))

  • 980 Accesses

Abstract

Every year government faces tax fraud with many methods. Big data and analytics enable government organizations to improve existing processes of detection and engage in entirely new types of analyses to allow tax authority to prevent tax fraud, reduce the cost of managing taxes and optimize public spending. Fraud detection often includes analyzing large datasets to locate irregularities. Anomaly detection helps by exploring every possible path to find fraudsters but it’s often results in large number of false positive, that is entries wrongly identified as fraud. When a taxpayer is wrongly flagged, the intervention of an audit agent is necessary and so a big time of investigations to finally lose time, effort and money.

The purpose of this paper is to propose a model of false positive elimination in Moroccan fiscal fraud detection based on clustering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baader, G., Krcmar, H.: Reducing false positives in fraud detection: combining the red flag approach with process mining. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 31(February), 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gall, T., Maniadis, Z.: Evaluating solutions to the problem of false positives. Res. Policy 48(2), 506–515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, L., Li, T., Xie, N., Hu, J.: False positive elimination in intrusion detection based on clustering. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD 2015, pp. 519–523 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2015.7381996

  4. Kotu, V., Deshpande, B.: Anomaly detection. Data Sci. 447–6510 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814761-0.00013-7

  5. Leite, R.A., Gschwandtner, T., Miksch, S., Gstrein, E., Kuntner, J.: Visual analytics for event detection: focusing on fraud. Vis. Inf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, H., Yi, W., Kesheng, W.: Automatic detection of false positive RFID readings using machine learning algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 91, 442–451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matos, T., de Macedo, J.A., Monteiro, J.M.: An empirical method for discovering tax fraudsters: a real case study of Brazilian fiscal evasion (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2790755.2790759

  8. Pfund, D.M.: Radiation anomaly detection and classification with bayes model selection. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors Associated Equipment 904, 188–194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qian, B., Zheng, Q., Yan, Z., Ruan, J., Dong, B.: Identifying suspicious groups of affiliated-transaction-based tax evasion in big data. Inf. Sci. 477, 508–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evaldas, S., Leonas, L.: Hybrid approach model for prevention of tax evasion and fraud. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 213, 383–389 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stripling, E., Baesens, B., Chizi, B., vanden Broucke, S.: Isolation-based conditional anomaly detection on mixed-attribute data to uncover workers’ compensation fraud. Decis. Support Syst. 111(April), 13–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., Kumar, V.: Anomaly detection: a survey. Conform. Predict. Reliab. Mach. Learn.: Theory Adapt. Appl. 41(3), 71–97 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398537-8.00004-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rahimikiaa, E., Mohammadib, S., Rahmanic, T., Ghazanfari, M.: Detecting corporate tax evasion using a hybrid intelligent system: a case study of Iran. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 25, 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao, Y., Yang, W., Gao F., Yu, G.: Anomaly intrusion detection approach using hybrid MLP/CNN neural. In: Network Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2006), 0-7695-2528-8/06 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houda Jihal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jihal, H., Ounacer, S., Ardchir, S., Azouazi, M. (2020). Clustering Model of False Positive Elimination in Moroccan Fiscal Fraud Detection. In: Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2019). AI2SD 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1104. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36671-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics