Advertisement

Microfluidic Devices and Three Dimensional-Printing Strategies for in vitro Models of Bone

  • F. Raquel MaiaEmail author
  • Rui L. Reis
  • Vitor M. Correlo
  • Joaquim M. Oliveira
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 1230)

Abstract

Bone is a complex and highly dynamic tissue, which has been worldwide studied, from fundamental biology to tissue engineering fields. Even so, current in vitro models do not truly replicate the native bone tissue environment. For so, new and improved in vitro tissue models are necessary to obtain more reliable data, not only in a development point of view, but also to fasten the translation of new drugs into the clinics. In this reasoning, tissue-engineering strategies were applied to develop mimetic and three-dimensional (3D) microenvironments, which were associated with microfluidic devices for the development of more complex and realistic systems. Such devices mimic blood vessels that are present in the native tissue, thus enabling the study of complex biological mechanism as such as bone angiogenesis. More recently, 3D printing has been pursued to produce more intricate microfluidic devices and engineered tissues in a single step. The ability to print spatially controlled structures composed of different biomaterials, growth factors and cells caught the attention of scientists for the development of more efficient in vitro models. Additionally, it allows obtaining microfluidic devices and/or engineered tissues with the desired architecture within a small amount of time and with reduced costs. Recently, the use of high-resolution scanning boosted the production of patient-specific implants. Despite the difficulties associated with 3D printed structures that still need to be overcome, it has been proven to be a valuable tool to accomplish a new generation of 3D bioprinted bone-on-a-chip platforms.

Keywords

Bone tissue engineering Microfluidic devices Three-dimensional models Bioprinting In vitro models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the funds obtained through the FROnTHERA (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-0000232) project supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Program (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). FRM acknowledges Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for her post-doc grant (SFRH/BPD/117492/2016), JMO thanks FCT for the distinction attributed under the Investigator FCT program (IF/01285/2015) and VMC acknowledges Investigator FCT program (IF/01214/2014).

References

  1. Adepu S, Dhiman N, Laha A, Sharma CS, Ramakrishna S, Khandelwal M (2017) Three-dimensional bioprinting for bone tissue regeneration. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2:22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrigoni C, Gilardi M, Bersini S, Candrian C, Moretti M (2017) Bioprinting and organ-on-Chip applications towards personalized medicine for bone diseases. Stem Cell Rev 13(3):407–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-017-9741-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aziz AUR, Geng C, Fu M, Yu X, Qin K, Liu B (2017) The role of microfluidics for organ on Chip simulations. Bioengineering 4(2):39.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020039CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendtsen ST, Wei M (2017) In vitro evaluation of 3D bioprinted tri-polymer network scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 105(12):3262–3272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharjee N, Urrios A, Kang S, Folch A (2016) The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab Chip 16(10):1720–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00163gCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhise NS, Manoharan V, Massa S, Tamayol A, Ghaderi M, Miscuglio M, Lang Q, Shrike Zhang Y, Shin SR, Calzone G, Annabi N, Shupe TD, Bishop CE, Atala A, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A (2016) A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids. Biofabrication 8(1):014101.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boga JC, Miguel SP, de Melo-Diogo D, Mendonca AG, Louro RO, Correia IJ (2018) In vitro characterization of 3D printed scaffolds aimed at bone tissue regeneration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 165:207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouet G, Marchat D, Cruel M, Malaval L, Vico L (2015) In vitro three-dimensional bone tissue models: from cells to controlled and dynamic environment. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 21(1):133–156.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Jia W, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Shin SR, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2017) Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthcare Mat 6(16):1700015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho MR, Reis RL, Oliveira JM (2018) Mimicking the 3D biology of osteochondral tissue with microfluidic-based solutions: breakthroughs towards boosting drug testing and discovery. Drug Discov Today 23:711–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL (2017) Fast setting silk fibroin bioink for bioprinting of patient-specific memory-shape implants. Adv Healthcare Mat 6(22):n/a-n/a.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, Ribeiro VP, da Silva Morais A, Oliveira JM, Reis RL (2018) Engineering patient-specific bioprinted constructs for treatment of degenerated intervertebral disc. Mat Today Commun doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.01.011, 506, 512, 19
  13. Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, Williams MA, Mallick KK (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 47:237–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cui H, Zhu W, Nowicki M, Zhou X, Khademhosseini A, Zhang LG (2016) Hierarchical fabrication of engineered vascularized bone biphasic constructs via dual 3D bioprinting: integrating regional bioactive factors into architectural design. Adv Healthc Mater 5(17):2174–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunniffe GM, Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Daly A, Sathy BN, Jeon O, Alsberg E, Kelly DJ (2017) Three-dimensional bioprinting of Polycaprolactone reinforced gene activated bioinks for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 23(17–18):891–900.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Datta P, Ozbolat V, Ayan B, Dhawan A, Ozbolat IT (2017) Bone tissue bioprinting for craniofacial reconstruction. Biotechnol Bioeng 114(11):2424–2431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, Chen Z (2017) Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology 32(4):266–277.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00036.2016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Faramarzi N, Yazdi IK, Nabavinia M, Gemma A, Fanelli A, Caizzone A, Ptaszek LM, Sinha I, Khademhosseini A, Ruskin JN, Tamayol A (2018) Patient-specific bioinks for 3D bioprinting of tissue engineering Scaffolds. e1701347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701347
  19. Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, Alblas J, Dhert WJ (2008) Three-dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng A 14(1):127–133.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.a.2007.0158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fedorovich NE, Wijnberg HM, Dhert WJ, Alblas J (2011) Distinct tissue formation by heterogeneous printing of osteo- and endothelial progenitor cells. Tissue Eng A 17(15–16):2113–2121.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Florencio-Silva R, GRDS S, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS (2015) Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed Res Int 17:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/421746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hao S, Ha L, Cheng G, Wan Y, Xia Y, Sosnoski DM, Mastro AM, Zheng SY (2018) A spontaneous 3D bone-on-a-chip for bone metastasis study of breast cancer cells. Small 14(12):1702787.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He HY, Zhang JY, Mi X, Hu Y, Gu XY (2015) Rapid prototyping for tissue-engineered bone scaffold by 3D printing and biocompatibility study. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(7):11777–11785PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho CM, Ng SH, Li KH, Yoon YJ (2015) 3D printed microfluidics for biological applications. Lab Chip 15(18):3627–3637.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00685fCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, Herrmann J, Obuobi H, Moisan A, Lewis JA (2016) Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on Perfusable chips. Sci Rep 6:34845.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Jariwala SH, Lewis GS, Bushman ZJ, Adair JH, Donahue HJ (2015) 3D printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds. 3d Print Additive Manuf 2(2):56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jusoh N, Oh S, Kim S, Kim J, Jeon NL (2015) Microfluidic vascularized bone tissue model with hydroxyapatite-incorporated extracellular matrix. Lab Chip 15(20):3984–3988.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00698HCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang H-W, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34:312–319.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413. https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3413#supplementary-informationCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee H, Cho D-W (2016) One-step fabrication of an organ-on-a-chip with spatial heterogeneity using a 3D bioprinting technology. Lab Chip 16(14):2618–2625.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00450DCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee JH, Gu Y, Wang H, Lee WY (2012) Microfluidic 3D bone tissue model for high-throughput evaluation of wound-healing and infection-preventing biomaterials. Biomaterials 33(4):999–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li L, Yu F, Shi J, Shen S, Teng H, Yang J, Wang X, Jiang Q (2017) In situ repair of bone and cartilage defects using 3D scanning and 3D printing. Sci Rep 7(1):9416.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10060-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lima MJ, Correlo VM, Reis RL (2014a) Micro/nano replication and 3D assembling techniques for scaffold fabrication. Mater Sci Eng C 42:615–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lima MJ, Pirraco RP, Sousa RA, Neves NM, Marques AP, Bhattacharya M, Correlo VM, Reis RL (2014b) Bottom-up approach to construct microfabricated multi-layer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevices 16(1):69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-013-9806-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Macdonald NP, Cabot JM, Smejkal P, Guijt RM, Paull B, Breadmore MC (2017) Comparing microfluidic performance of three-dimensional (3D) printing platforms. Anal Chem 89(7):3858–3866.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maia FR, Musson DS, Naot D, da Silva LP, Bastos AR, Costa JB, Oliveira JM, Correlo VM, Reis RL, Cornish J (2018) Differentiation of osteoclast precursors on gellan gum-based spongy-like hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mat (Bristol, England) 13(3):035012.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aaaf29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matic I, Matthews BG, Wang X, Dyment NA, Worthley DL, Rowe DW, Grcevic D, Kalajzic I (2016) Quiescent bone lining cells are a major source of osteoblasts during adulthood. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 34(12):2930–2942.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rafał W, Krzysztof A (2015) Inkjet 3D printing of microfluidic structures—on the selection of the printer towards printing your own microfluidic chips. J Micromech Microeng 25(8):085013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salentijn GIJ, Oomen PE, Grajewski M, Verpoorte E (2017) Fused deposition modeling 3D printing for (bio)analytical device fabrication: procedures, materials, and applications. Anal Chem 89(13):7053–7061.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Veerla SC, Kim DR, Yang SY (2018) Fabrication of a microfluidic device for studying the in situ drug-loading/release behavior of graphene oxide-encapsulated hydrogel beads. Biomat Res 22(1):7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0119-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Waheed S, Cabot JM, Macdonald NP, Lewis T, Guijt RM, Paull B, Breadmore MC (2016) 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip 16(11):1993–2013.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00284FCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang X, Tolba E, Schröder HC, Neufurth M, Feng Q, Diehl-Seifert B, Müller WEG (2014) Effect of bioglass on growth and biomineralization of SaOS-2 cells in hydrogel after 3D cell bioprinting. PLoS One 9(11):e112497.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112497CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang XF, Song Y, Liu YS, Sun YC, Wang YG, Wang Y, Lyu PJ (2016) Osteogenic differentiation of three-dimensional bioprinted constructs consisting of human adipose-derived stem cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One 11(6):e0157214.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu Z, Su X, Xu Y, Kong B, Sun W, Mi S (2016) Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation. Sci Rep 6:24474.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Yi H-G, Lee H, Cho D-W (2017) 3D printing of organs-on-chips. Bioengineering 4(1):10.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010010CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Raquel Maia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Rui L. Reis
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Vitor M. Correlo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Joaquim M. Oliveira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.3B’s Research Group, I3Bs – Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineGuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.ICVS/3B’s PT Government Associate LabGuimarãesPortugal
  3. 3.The Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision Medicine, Headquarters at University of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations