Abstract
Over the past decade, the use of social media and online networking tools has become popular within Indian society and by the Indian government. This research uses social network analysis in order to analyze 20,000 Twitter conversations on two major issues in Indian politics. The first topic is the controversial Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, which has been used by the current administration to strip thousands of NGOs of their ability to receive funding from abroad. The second case study looks at the issue of demonetization of currency in India. By observing how people cluster online based on their ideological, political, and religious beliefs, this work finds that social media tools are a powerful way state governments can more effectively target their messages to groups of interest in foreign nations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja, N. (2016, December 15). Now, MHA cancels FCRA licence of Shabnam Hashmi’s ANHAD, 3 other NGOs. The Week. Retrieved from https://www.theweek.in/content/archival/news/india/mha-cancels-fcra-licence-of-shabnam-hashmi-anhad-3-other-ngos.html
Ali, Z., & Ajaz, N. (2014). Social media and Indo-Pak relations: Applying agenda setting theory. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 3(1). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/8997179/Role_of_Social_Media_in_Indo-Pak_Relations_Applying_Agenda_Setting
Banday, M. T., & Mattoo, M. M. (2013). Social media in e-Governance: A study with special reference to India. Social Networking, 2(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2013.22006
Belair-Gagnon, V., Mishra, S., & Agur, C. (2013). Reconstructing the Indian public sphere: Newswork and social media in the Delhi gang rape case. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 15(8), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913513430
Bhalla, N. (2015, April 25). U.S. voices concern over India action against Ford Foundation, Greenpeace. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-charity-watchlist/u-s-voices-concern-over-india-action-against-ford-foundation-greenpeace-idUSKBN0NG0UZ20150425
Bhatnagar, G. V. (2016, December 16). NGOs take to social media to slam FCRA licence cancellation. The Wire. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/politics/ngos-take-social-media-slam-fcra-licence-cancellation
Bhattacharya, D. (2018, October 26). FCRA licences of 20,000 NGOs cancelled: Act being used as weapon to silence organisations. Times of India. Retrieved from https://www.firstpost.com/india/fcra-licences-of-20000-ngos-cancelled-act-being-used-as-weapon-to-silence-organisations-3181560.html
Chaturvedi, A. (2016, December 3). Demonetisation rules social media, most netizens leaning in favour. The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/demonetisation-rules-social-media-most-netizens-leaning-in-favour/articleshow/55760319.cms?from=mdr
Choi, M., Sang, Y., & Park, H. W. (2014). Exploring political discussions by Korean Twitter users: A look at opinion leadership and homophily phenomenon. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(6), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-11-2012-0089
Cull, N. J. (2013). The long road to public diplomacy 2.0: The internet in US public diplomacy. International Studies Review, 15(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12026
Dale, H. (2009, December 8). Public diplomacy 2.0: Where the U.S. government meets “New Media”. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/public-diplomacy-20-where-the-us-government-meets-new-media
Ewbank, A. D. (2015). Library advocacy through Twitter: A social media analysis of #savelibraries and #getESEAright. School Libraries Worldwide, 21(2), 26–38.
Government of India. (1976). The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976. Retrieved from http://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1976-49.pdf
Hansen, D. L., Schneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Harel, D., & Koren, Y. (2000). A fast multi-scale method for drawing large graphs. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces—AVI 00. https://doi.org/10.1145/345513.345353
Hayden, C. (2013). Social diplomacy, public diplomacy, and network power. In S. Kalathil (Ed.), Diplomacy, development, and security in the information age. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.
Khatib, L., Dutton, W., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Public diplomacy 2.0: A case study of the US digital outreach team. Middle East Journal, 66(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.3751/66.3.14
Kumar, S., & Kumar, T. (2016). Demonetization and complete financial inclusion. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 6(12), 1703. Retrieved from http://ijmrr.com/admin/upload_data/journal_T%20Shiva%20Kumar%20%208dec16mrr.pdf
Kusiak, P. (2012). Culture, identity, and information technology in the 21st century: Implications for U.S. National Security. U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. Retrieved from https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pdffiles/PUB1122.pdf
Narayan, S. S., & Narayanan, S. (2016). India connected: Mapping the impact of new media (Google books version). Sherman Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Natarajan, K. (2014). Digital public diplomacy and a strategic narrative for India. Strategic Analysis, 38(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.863478
Number of social network users in India from 2015 to 2023 (in millions). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278407/number-of-social-network-users-in-india/
Pal, J., & Gonawela, A. (2016). Political social media in the global SouthVersion (Springer Link version). In Social media: The good, the bad, and the ugly lecture notes in computer science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_52
Pozzi, F. A., Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Liu, B. (2017). Sentiment analysis in social networks [Science Direct version]. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-01864-0
Press Trust of India. (2016, August 25). PM Narendra Modi Becomes Most Followed Indian on Twitter. The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/pm-modi-becomes-third-most-followed-leader-on-Twitter-crossing-50-million-followers-2302397.html
Repucci, S., Dunham, J., Nelson, B., O’Toole, S., Aghekyan, E., Tucker, V., & Puddington, A. (2016). Freedom in the world 2016: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties [Google Books version].
Rizvi, S. A. (2014). Concerted efforts by select foreign funded NGOs to ‘take down’ Indian development projects. Intelligence Bureau.
Ruparelia, S. (2015). ‘Minimum government, maximum governance’: The restructuring of power in Modis India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(4), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974
Singh, P., & Singh, V. (2016). Impact of demonetization on Indian economy. International Journal of Science Technology and Management, 5(12), 625–635.
Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Himelboim, I. (2014, February 20). Mapping twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-Twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/
Uhl, A., Kolleck, N., & Schiebel, E. (2016). Twitter data analysis as contribution to strategic foresight-The case of the EU Research Project “Foresight and Modelling for European Health Policy and Regulations” (FRESHER). European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0102-4
Velmurugan, K. (2016). Upshot of demonetization in India. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 3(11), 4788–4790. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijetst/v3i11.11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chatlani, S. (2020). Finding Ideological Divisions in Indian Society Through Online Twitter Conversations. In: Jones, J., Trice, M. (eds) Platforms, Protests, and the Challenge of Networked Democracy. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36524-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36525-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)