Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society ((PSGCS))

  • 268 Accesses


The name Lampedusa resonates meaning in multiple ways. Located at the outskirts of the European Union and place of refuge for a large number of refugees, the Mediterranean island Lampedusa has not only become a contemporary symbol for the so-called European refugee crisis, but also for the dramatic failure of the European Union’s current border and migration policy. This chapter questions and opposes the interpretation of Lampedusa as a problematic and worrisome site at the European margins, and argues that Lampedusa should rather be seen as a heterotopian space at the heart of Europe and read as symptomatic for the European Union’s in many respects faltering neoliberal politics. It elaborates on this idea by analysing the theatre text Lampedusa (2015) by the acclaimed British playwright Anders Lustgarten. The chapter demonstrates how this Lampedusa brings two individuals’ struggles to endure the specific situations of “crisis” they find themselves in together and prompts its readers to think about their narratives as “touching tales”—touching in the sense of equally emotionally charged (tales of insecurity, pain, loss, and fear) but also, importantly, touching in the sense of bordering on each other and interconnected in pivotal ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. 1.

    I am well aware of the multiple and contested meanings of the term neoliberalism, as a.o. described by Damien Cahill et al. in The Sage Handbook of Neoliberalism (2018). In this chapter I consider neoliberalism as the hegemonic political doctrine in contemporary Europe that entails a mode of liberal governance that prioritizes free market and economic growth and that emphasizes consumer citizenship, personal responsibility, and individual empowerment. See Van Weyenberg (2016) for a critical discussion of the center/periphery binary in the EU’s attempted construction of a “shared” narrative of Europe.

  2. 2.

    This chapter chooses to read the script of Lampedusa as a literary text and focuses on its politics of literary representation and on the way in which the dramatic text addresses its readers. The play was first performed in the Soho Theatre in London in 2014 and has been successful ever since with performances all over Europe, including Germany, Malta, and Greece. Each of these performances provides a different, often strongly site-specific interpretation of the dramatic text.

  3. 3.

    As many scholars have pointed out, refugee crisis rhetoric represents migrants and refugees either as powerless victims, in need of help, or criminalizes them as public welfare abusers and even terrorists (Bauman 2016, Wienand and Minnaard 2019, Žižek 2016). Scholars also emphasize the strong politicization of the terminology used for people trying to cross the Mediterranean “illegally” (Carasthatis et al. 2018, De Genova and Tazzioli 2016).

  4. 4.

    A similar trend can be distinguished in the field of film. See, for instance, Bennett 2018 and Rangan 2017.

  5. 5.

    In Contemporary Asylum Narratives: Representing Refugees in the Twenty-First Century, Agnes Woolley warns that “representations cloud as much as they clarify” and states that the “tension between occlusion and revelation is most ethically and politically pressing in relation to disenfranchised groups who have only limited access to the means of self-representation” (2014, 3).

  6. 6.

    For a thorough reflection on empathic identification in respect to artistic representations of refugee experiences see Houwen 2016.

  7. 7.

    This idea resonates in interesting ways with Iain Chambers’ notion of the Mediterranean as a postcolonial sea (2004).

  8. 8.

    Although the Mediterranean appears as the monstrous producer of death here, the association of refugees themselves with contagion and illness—“carrier[s] of a disease called ‘crisis’” (De Genova et al. 2016, 20)—is activated here as well. As De Genova et al. write: “Some of these embodiments of ‘crisis’ are literally converted into figures of death as the corpses of migrants and refugees become spectacularly visible through the proliferation of images of dead bodies floating in the sea or washing upon the shores of ‘Europe’” (20).

  9. 9.

    In a later, major dramatic moment in Stefano’s monologue, this image of the Mediterranean as monstrous returns: “Leviathan looms. A monstrous wave as tall as a tower block, so tall it has little waterfalls tumbling from its crest. … A roar, and it slams us under its paw and the whole boat goes under” (26/27). The two fishermen in this scene, Stefano and his compagnon, survive, but on the surface of this cannibalistic Mediterranean they detect “[t]he black silhouettes of corpses” (28), the monster’s prey.

  10. 10.

    Kaja Silverman (1996) makes a distinction between idiopathic and heteropathic identification. The first form relies on a certain (projected) likeness between the other and the self, whereas the latter involves a more risky, but as Ernst van Alphen argues also more “affectively powerful” (2008, 28), temporary and partially becoming like the other.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Boletsi 2018.

  12. 12.

    Cf. De Genova 2018.

  13. 13.

    Mark Neocleous states that “[r]esilience comes to form the basis of subjectively dealing with the uncertainty and instability of contemporary capitalism as well as the insecurity of the national security state … Neoliberal citizenship is nothing if not a training in resilience as the new technology of the self: a training to withstand whatever crisis capital undergoes and whatever political measures the state carries out to save it” (2013, 5). See also Bracke 2016. The factors of race and gender are also determinant of Denise’s position and point at the intricate intersection of neoliberalism with postfeminism, as described by Jess Butler (2013).

  14. 14.

    Both Stefano’s and Denise’s monologues, about “navigating what’s overwhelming” in a situation of “impasse induced by crisis” (Berlant 2011, 10), fit Berlant’s interpretive framework of “cruel optimism” exceptionally well: their stories “are about the cruelty of optimism for people without control over the material conditions of their lives and whose relation of fantasy is all that protects them from being destroyed by other people and the nation.” (2006, 33).

  15. 15.

    These narrative developments very much resonate with Judith Butler’s idea that “imagining community affirms relationality not only as a descriptive or historical fact of our formation, but also as an ongoing normative dimension of our social and political lives, one in which we are compelled to take stock of our interdependence” (2004, 27).

Works Cited

  • Abderrezak, Hakim. 2016. Ex-Centric Migrations. In Europe and the Maghreb in Mediterranean Cinema, Literature, and Music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelson, Leslie A. 2005. The Turkish Turn in Contemporary German Literature: Toward a New Critical Grammar of Migration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen, Ernst. 2008. Affective Operations of Art and Literature. RES 53 (54): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2016. Strangers at Our Door. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Bruce. 2018. Becoming Refugees: Exodus and Contemporary Mediations of the Refugee Crisis. Transnational Cinemas 9 (1): 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2006. Cruel Optimism. Differences: Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 17 (3): 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boletsi, Maria. 2018. The Futurity of Things Past: Thinking Greece beyond Crisis. Inaugural Speech as Marilena Laskaridis Chair of Modern Greek Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 21 September 2018. University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracke, Sarah. 2016. Bouncing Back. Vulnerability and Resistance in Times of Resilience. In Vulnerability in Resistance, ed. Judith Butler, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay, 52–75. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Jess. 2013. For White Girls Only? Postfeminism and the Politics of Inclusion. Feminist Formations 25 (1): 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay, eds. 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Damien, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings, and David Primrose, eds. 2018. The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calargé, Carla. 2015. Clandestine or Conquistadores? Beyond Sensational Headlines, or a Literature of Urgency. Research in African Literatures 46 (2): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carastathis, Anna, Natalie Kouri-Towe, Gada Mahrouse, and Leila Whitley. 2018. Introduction. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees 34 (1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik, Ipek A. 2015. In Permanent Crisis. Ethnicity in Contemporary European Media and Cinema. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Iain. 2004. The Mediterranean. A Postcolonial Sea. Third Text 18 (5): 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Tim. 2007. Place. A Short Introduction. Malden; Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicolas. 2018. The ‘Migrant Crisis’ as Racial Crisis: Do Black Lives Matter in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (10): 1765–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicholas and Martine Tazzioli, eds. 2016. Europe/Crisis: New Keywords of ‘the Crisis’ in and of ‘Europe.’ Zone Books Online. Accessed August 22, 2019.

  • Houwen, Janna. 2016. An Empty Table and an Empty Boat: Empathic Encounters with Refugee Experiences in Intermedial Installation Art. American, British and Canadian Studies 27 (1): 44–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, Andreas. 1995. Twilight Memories. Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. New York; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, Anders. 2015. Lampedusa. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, Mark. 2013. Resisting Resilience. Radical Philosophy 178 (March/April): 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, Pooja. 2017. Immediations: The Humanitarian Impulse in Documentary. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, Michael. 2009. Multidirectional Memory. Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. 1996. The Threshold of the Visible World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Weyenberg, Astrid. 2016. ‘Repairing Europe’: A Critical Reading of Storytelling in European Cultural Projects. In Peripheral Visions in the Globalizing Present. Space, Mobility, Aesthetics, ed. Esther Peeren, Hanneke Stuit, and Astrid Van Weyenberg, 164–181. Amsterdam; Leiden: Brill Rodopi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wienand, Kea, and Liesbeth Minnaard. 2019. Introduction: Taking Positions on the ‘Refugee Crisis’: Critical Responses in Art and Literature. FKW // Zeitschrift für Geschlechterforschung und visuelle Kultur 66 (September): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, Agnes. 2014. Contemporary Asylum Narratives: Representing Refugees in the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Narrating the ‘Asylum Story’: Between Literary and Legal Storytelling. Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 19 (3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2016. Against the Double Blackmail. Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with the Neighbours. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liesbeth Minnaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minnaard, L. (2020). Lampedusa in Europe; Or Touching Tales of Vulnerability. In: Boletsi, M., Houwen, J., Minnaard, L. (eds) Languages of Resistance, Transformation, and Futurity in Mediterranean Crisis-Scapes. Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics