Skip to main content

Environmental Benefits of Using Spent Pot Lining (SPL) in Cement Production

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2020

Abstract

Spent pot lining (SPL) is a toxic waste material produced during the pot replacement process in the aluminium industry. This paper presents a comprehensive environmental assessment of a case study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where SPL from Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA) was used as a feedstock at a cement plant in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. Three areas of environmental concern were studied: fuel savings and CO2 reductions, changes in NOx emissions, and raw material repurposing and toxic substance destruction. The use of SPL in cement production is shown to yield significant environmental benefits in terms of reducing emissions and coal consumption and destroying toxic substances. These changes are primarily attributed to the fluoride content in SPL creating fluoride fluxing effects that reduce the high temperature requirements of the cement kiln. This initiative bolsters the concept of a circular economy in which different industries collaborate to improve environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Al Jawi and H. Saleh Akasha (2018), Opportunities in using spent pot lining (SPL) in cement kilns, [internal document], Emirates Global Alminum, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Feroz and G. Ram (2016), Feasibility study on spent pot lining (SPL) as raw material in cement manufacture process. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2016, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pierre B. Personnet (1999), Treatment and reuse of spent pot lining, An industrial application in a cement kiln,” Light Metals, 1999, 1049–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Samec, D. Mikša, and F. Kokalj (2004), Recycling possibilities of spent potlining from the aluminum industry,” Waste Manag. Environ. II, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Valério Gomes et al. (2005), Co-processing at cement plant of spent potlining from the aluminum industry, Light Metals., 2005, 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. V. S. Chidambaram and R. B. Garg (2018), Star Cement production process, [Internal document], Ras Al Khaimah, UAE, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Makio Yamashita and Hisanobu Tanaka (2011), Low-temperature burnt Portland cement clinker using mineralizer, Cem. Sci. Concrete Technol., No. 65, 2011, 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. Dominguez et al. (2010), Characterization using thermomechanical and differential thermal analysis of the sinterization of Portland clinker doped with CaF2, Mater. Charact., Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010, 459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Philippe Dagaut, Peter Glarborg, and Maria U. Alzueta (2008), The oxidation of hydrogen cyanide and related chemistry, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., Vol. 34, No. 1, 2008, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. FLSmidth (2003), Burner bible, [workbook], A-1–B-5A.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. B. Garg and S. Gangadharan (2015), Burnability study of raw materials, [Standard Operating Procedure], Star Cement.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bill Neuffer and Mike Laney (2007), Alternative control techniques document update - NOx emissions from new cement kilns, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rebecca Battye, Stephanie Walsh, and Judy Lee-Greco (2000), NOx control technologies for cement industry: Final report, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Tomita, Emissions reduction: NOx/SOx suppression, 1st ed. Elsevier Science, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fluent Incorporated (2003), Thermal NOx formation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fluent Incorporated (2003), Fuel NOx formation.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johannes Haus (2014), Evaluation of the NOx formation in a rotary kiln test facility, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. W. Peterson, L. C. Blayden, and E. S. Martin (1985), Formation and distribution of cyanide in the lining of aluminum reduction cells, Light Metals 1985, 1411–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rudolf Keller, C. N. Cochran, and David B. Stofesky (1996), Suppression of cyanide formation in electrolytic cell lining, US5538604A.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gary Fisher (2002), Methods of destruction of cyanide in cyanide-containing waste, US6596916B1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Brouwer et al. (1996), A model for prediction of selective non-catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides by ammonia, urea, and cyanuric acid with mixing limitations in the presence of CO, Proceedings of 26th International Symposium on Combustion, Naples, Italy, July 1996, 2117–2124.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (Canada) Inc. (2018), Emirates Global Aluminum (EGA) spent pot liner and carbon cathodes - Test programme report, Calgary, AB, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Melanie and G. Calvert (1999), ASTM C150/C150 M - 18 Standard Specifications for Portland Cement, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Gangadharan (2018), Burnability study MIT - Annexure 2&3, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. G. Van Oss and A. C. Padovani (2003), Cement manufacture and the environment, Part II: Environmental challenges and opportunities, J. Ind. Ecol., Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Burchart-Korol et al. (2016), Model of environmental life cycle assessment for coal mining operations, Sci. Total Environ., Vol. 562, 2016, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Port of Richard’s Bay, South Africa to Port of Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates: 4411 nautical miles. [Online Document]. Available: http://ports.com/sea-route/port-of-richards-bay,south-africa/port-of-ras-al-khaimah,united-arab-emirates/.

  28. European Chemical Industry Council (2011), Guidelines for measuring and managing CO2 emission from freight transport operations.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. N. Psaraftis and C. A. Kontovas (2006), Ship emissions calculator, National Technical University of Athens, 2006. [Online Document]. Available: http://www.martrans.org/emis/.

  30. Erica Bickford (2012), Emissions and air quality impacts of freight transportation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frank Dünnelbeil and Udo Lambrecht (2012), Fuel efficiency and emissions of trucks in Germany: An overview, IFEU-Institute Heidelberg, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National greenhouse accounts (NGA) factors (2008), Department of the Environment and Energy, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Emission estimation technique manual for explosive detonation and firing ranges, Department of the Environment and Energy, Australia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Natural gas and the environment (2004), [Online Document]. Available: http://www.naturalgas.org/environment/naturalgas.

  35. A. Q. Jakhrani et al. (2012), Estimation of carbon footprints from diesel generator emissions, 2012 Int. Conf. Green Ubiquitous Technol.

    Google Scholar 

  36. José L. Silveira, João A. de Carvalho, and Iraídes A. de Castro Villela (2007), Combined cycle versus one thousand diesel power plants: pollutant emissions, ecological efficiency and economic analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007, 524–535.

    Google Scholar 

  37. DEWA Sustainability Report (2016), Dubai Electricity & Water Authority.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Al Jawi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jawi, M.A. et al. (2020). Environmental Benefits of Using Spent Pot Lining (SPL) in Cement Production. In: Tomsett, A. (eds) Light Metals 2020. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_172

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics