Advertisement

A Tweet-Ranking System Using Sentiment Scores and Popularity Measures

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1097)

Abstract

Various fields look to Twitter as a marvelous repository of users’ opinions. Decision-makers rely on Twitter to examine tweets about various topics of interest. In doing so, they can determine the nature, context, and accompanying emotions of what people are discussing. The topics taken up in such discussions include current affairs, events, and products, and tweets can indicate both the intensity of discussions and how people react to them. In this paper, we propose a system that collects tweets and applies sentiment analysis to them. It allows users and decision-makers to browse an ordered and categorized list of tweets based on their sentiment and popularity measures, such as retweet and favorite. An essential advantage of our system is that it can be used more generally to explore any topic of interest with which the public is engaging on Twitter. Our findings show that using the number of retweets and the number of favorites enhances the sentiment scores and enables the highlighting of tweets’ most common opinion on a given topic.

Keywords

Twitter Sentiment analysis Retweet favorite 

References

  1. 1.
    Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends® Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter Sentiment Classification using Distant Supervision (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), Valletta, Malta (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arslan, Y., Birturk, A., Djumabaev, B., Kucuk, D.: Real-time Lexicon-based sentiment analysis experiments on Twitter with a mild (more information, less data) approach. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Boston, MA, pp. 1892–1897 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guevara, J., Costa, J., Arroba, J., Silva, C.: Harvesting opinions in Twitter for sentiment analysis. In: 2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Caceres, pp. 1–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lashari, I.A., Wiil, U.K.: Monitoring public opinion by measuring the sentiment of retweets on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Social Media Research, Caen, France (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsugawa, S., Ohsaki, H.: On the relation between message sentiment and its virality on social media. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 7(1), 19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erzikova, E., Gandy, L.M., Hall, A., Kuntz, K.: The 2014 NFL player ray rice domestic abuse case: an analysis of factors that contributed to tweet popularity during the scandal. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Social Media Research, Caen, France (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rinker, T.: sentimentr: Calculate Text Polarity Sentiment (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Shanahan, J.G., Qu, Y., Wiebe, J. (eds.) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 20, pp. 1–10. Springer, Dordrecht (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD 2004, Seattle, WA, USA, p. 168 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Mohammad, S.M.: Sentiment analysis of short ınformal texts. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50, 723–762 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcıng a word-emotıon assocıatıon lexıcon. Comput. Intell. 29(3), 436–465 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations