Skip to main content

Olympic Gigantism and the Multifaceted Concept of Sports Venues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Cultural and Tourism Innovation in the Digital Era

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The immense growth in popularity and the universal acceptance of the Olympic ideals has led, amongst others, to an increase in all aspects of Games participation, organization, complexity and cost. Increases in the number of sports, disciplines and events, as well as competing nations, athletes and attending media, have led to a quadrupling in numbers and requirements in all Games-related areas. These increases have affected not only the number of technical officials, workforce, security, volunteers, accommodation and transport, but most notably the number and size of venues and their standards. Through literature review this paper discusses the key factors in connection to the increasing scale and scope of the Olympics and outlines the underlying problems, whilst simultaneously shedding light on the diverse and controversial attributes ascribed to sports venues, which impede their post-Games management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With the addition of women’s boxing at London 2012, all the Olympic sports are now open to athletes of both genders (Chappelet and Parent 2015).

  2. 2.

    Official website of the Paralympic Movement (www.paralympic.org).

  3. 3.

    In his candidature manifesto for the IOC Presidency, he wrote “Common sense should incite us to look at ways of slightly reducing the size, cost and complexity of the Games in order to make them less vulnerable to the future. This approach would enable all continents and regions to organize the Games more easily and would encourage geographical rotation” (Chappelet 2014).

  4. 4.

    It has often been noted cynically in the media that, generally, the only amateurs left in the Olympic Movement are the Games organizers (Pound 2016).

  5. 5.

    The One-China Policy prevents the diplomatic recognition of both Beijing and Taipei simultaneously.

References

  • Alm, J. (2012). World stadium index. Stadiums built for major sporting events—Bright future or future burden. Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies. Retrieved from https://www.playthegame.org/fileadmin/documents/World_Stadium_Index_Final.pdf

  • Alm, J., Solberg, H. A., Storm, K. R., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2016). Hosting major sports events: The challenge of taming white elephants. Leisure Studies, 35, 564–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S. (2008). Athlete first: A history of the Paralympic movement. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolz, D. (2012). Olympic heritage—An international legacy: The invention of the modern Olympic Stadium from Coubertin to 1948. In J. Hill, K. Moore, & J. Wood (Eds.), Sport, history, and heritage: Studies in public representation. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R. (1999). Legacy. In R. Cashman & A. Hughes (Eds.), Staging the Olympics: The event and its impact. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R., & Darcy, S. (Eds.). (2008). Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic games. Petersham, NSW: Walla Walla Press in Conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, T. S. (2004). Sports facilities as urban redevelopment catalysts: Baltimore’s Camden Yards and Cleveland’s Gateway. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappelet, J. L. (2014). Managing the size of the Olympic Games. Sport in Society, 17(5), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappelet, J. L., & Kuebler, B. (2008). The IOC and the Olympic system. The governance of world sport. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappelet, J. L., & Parent, M. (2015). The (wide) world of sports events. In Routledge handbook of sports event management (pp. 19–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, J. J., & Souza, D. L. (2013). Sport mega-events: Can legacies and development be equitable and sustainable? Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 19(3), 580–589. ISSN 1980-6574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Taylor, T. (2013). Managing Olympic venues. In S. Frawley & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Olympics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. (2013). Conceptualizing mega-event flagships—A case study of China pavilion of Expo 2010 Shanghai China. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & Poon, S. W. (2013). Meeting sustainability challenges of mega-event flagships. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farry, W. (2015). China’s long game of stadium diplomacy in Africa. Retrieved from https://gbtimes.com/chinas-long-game-stadium-diplomacy-africa

  • Frawley, S., & Adair, D. (2013). The Olympic Games: Managerial and strategic dimensions. In S. Frawley & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Olympics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2011). The summer Olympics. In J. R. Gold & M. M. Gold (Eds.), Olympic cities: City agendas, planning and the world’s games, 1896–2016. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2013). Bring it under the legacy umbrella: Olympic host cities and the changing fortunes of the sustainability agenda. Sustainability, 5, 3526–3542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmann, A. (2002). The Olympics: A history of the modern games (2nd rev. ed.). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. The Roots of Geographical Change: 1973 to the Present.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, N., & Valiyev, A. (2016). Urban boosterism in closed contexts: Spectacular urbanization and second-tier mega-events in three Caspian capitals. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(5), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Ding, Q., & Sun, Y. (2008). Research on the factors of the urban system influenced post-development of the Olympics’ venues. In F. Sun, J. Zhang, Y. Tan, J. Cao, & W. Yu (Eds.), Advances in neural networks—ISNN 2008 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 5264). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mako, V., Blagojevic, M. R., & Lazara, M. V. (2014). Architecture and ideology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menary, S. (2015). China’s programme of stadium diplomacy. ICSS Journal, 3(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús, F. J. (2003). The Barcelona model: And an original formula? From “reconstruction” to strategic urban projects (1979–2004). Planning Perspectives, 18, 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2018). Sports diplomacy: Origins, theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olympic Games Study Commission. (2002). Interim report to the 114th IOC session.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, A., & Liao, H. (2013). An assessment technique for the evaluation and promotion of sustainable Olympic design and urban development. Building Research & Information, 41(6), 722–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, R. (2016). The management of big games: An introduction. Sport in Society, 19(6), 786–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasser, S. (2007). Chapter 5. Overcoming the ‘white elephant syndrome’ in big and iconic projects in the public and private sectors. In J. Wanna (Ed.), Improving implementation organisational change and project management (pp. 47–68). Canberra: ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. (2017). Olympic cities and the legacy of infrastructure: Barcelona 1992 and Athens 2004. Senior Capstone Projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. (2002). Olympic Stadiums of the modern age—Construction trends of the 20th century. In: Sport sites culture ICOMOS Journal of the German National Committee XXXVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (2006). Iconic architecture and capitalist globalization. City, 10(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, H. (1994). Marketing the city: The role of flagship developments in urban regeneration (1st ed.). London: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will, R. (2012). China’s stadium diplomacy. World Policy Journal, 29(2), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, A. (2010). Is it worth it? Hosting the Olympic Games and other mega sporting events is an honor many countries aspire to—But why? Finance & Development, 47, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Giannakopoulou, M. (2020). Olympic Gigantism and the Multifaceted Concept of Sports Venues. In: Katsoni, V., Spyriadis, T. (eds) Cultural and Tourism Innovation in the Digital Era. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36342-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics