Skip to main content

Sexual Fluidity Behind Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine

Part of the book series: Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine ((TASM))

Abstract

Beyond traditional markers of age, sex, and medical history, social identities such as nationality, socioeconomic status, and sexuality are relevant to a person’s health status and prognoses. Therefore, the field of sexual medicine is strongly encouraged to include an exploration of patients’ sexual identity within the scope of routine clinical assessments. Sexual identity involves many overlapping dimensions and is directly influenced by a person’s social and cultural context. While many components of sexual identity are considered stable, the literature demonstrates that there is consistent and reliable evidence for changes in adults’ sexual attraction referred to as sexual fluidity. Distinct from bisexuality, sexual fluidity can inform everything from behavior to fantasy, without necessarily impacting orientation or identity. Women and LGB folks are most likely to experience sexual fluidity. Through this chapter, the reader can expect a thorough exploration of the patterns, pathways, and perspectives on sexual fluidity. Such exploration allows medical practitioners to consider their role in providing medical and social support for sexually fluid patients, with the ultimate goal of ensuring that persons of all sexual identities are able to access competent and informed healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gender-neutral terminology (they, them, their, etc.), although at odds with traditional grammatical convention, is preferred in the LBG literature to gender specific terms such as he, she, him, her, himself, herself, etc.

References

  1. Dahan R, Feldman R, Hermoni D. The importance of sexual orientation in the medical consultation. Harefuah. 2007;146(8):626–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanders JQ, Feit MN, Alper J, editors. Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records: workshop summary. Washington: National Academies Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Safe Zone Project. LGBTQ+ Vocabulary. https://thesafezoneproject.com/resources/vocabulary/. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.

  4. Kinnish KK, Strassberg DS, Turner CW. Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: a multidimensional retrospective assessment. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34(2):173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Radtke S. Sexual fluidity in women: how feminist research influenced evolutionary studies of same-sex behavior. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol. 2013;7(4):336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitzinger C, Wilkinson S. Transitions from heterosexuality to lesbianism: the discursive production of lesbian identities. Dev Psychol. 1995;31(1):95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanford University. Sexual fluidity. https://vaden.stanford.edu/health-resources/lgbtqia-health/sexual-fluidity. Accessed 8 Jan 2019.

  8. Chivers ML, Rieger G, Latty E, Bailey JM. A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(11):736–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rieger G, Savin-Williams RC. The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e40256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Diamond LM. Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. Dev Psychol. 2000;36(2):241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond LM. The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: contributions of dynamical systems theory. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(1):73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Savin-Williams RC, Ream GL. Prevalence and stability of sexual orientation components during adolescence and young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(3):385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diamond LM. A dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2(2):142–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mock SE, Eibach RP. Stability and change in sexual orientation identity over a 10-year period in adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(3):641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manley MH, Diamond LM, van Anders SM. Polyamory, monoamory, and sexual fluidity: a longitudinal study of identity and sexual trajectories. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015;2(2):168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diamond LM. Sexual fluidity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baumeister RF. Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1949;109(3):283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH. Sexual behavior in the human female. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savin-Williams RC, Joyner K, Rieger G. Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity during young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(1):103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diamond LM. What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(1):173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stokes JP, McKirnan DJ, Burzette RG. Sexual behavior, condom use, disclosure of sexuality, and stability of sexual orientation in bisexual men. J Sex Res. 1993;30(3):203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandra A, Mosher WD, Copen C, Sionean C. Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth, National health statistics reports no 36. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mereish EH, Katz-Wise SL, Woulfe J. We’re here and we’re queer: sexual orientation and sexual fluidity differences between bisexual and queer women. J Bisexuality. 2017;17(1):125–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Diamond LM. Was it a phase? Young women's relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(2):352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosario M, Schrimshaw EW, Hunter J, Braun L. Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. J Sex Res. 2006;43(1):46–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Perrin EC. Sexual orientation in child and adolescent health care. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ott MQ, Corliss HL, Wypij D, Rosario M, Austin SB. Stability and change in self-reported sexual orientation identity in young people: application of mobility metrics. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(3):519–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhle BX, Radtke S. Born both ways: the alloparenting hypothesis for sexual fluidity in women. Evol Psychol. 2013;11(2):304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diamond LM. The evolution of plasticity in female-female desire. J Psychol Hum Sex. 2007;18(4):245–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. American Psychological Association, Practice Guidelines for GLB Clients. Am Psychol. 2012;67(1):10–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tolman DL, Diamond LM. Desegregating sexuality research: cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2001;12(1):33–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hynie M, Lydon JE, Cote S, Wiener S. Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: the importance of internalized norms. J Sex Res. 1998;35(4):370–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Anders SM, Goldey KL. Testosterone and partnering are linked via relationship status for women and ‘relationship orientation’ for men. Horm Behav. 2010;58(5):820–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuper LE, Nussbaum R, Mustanski B. Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. J Sex Res. 2012;49(2–3):244–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Butler J. Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse. Feminism/postmodernism; 1990, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sin R. Does sexual fluidity challenge sexual binaries? The case of bisexual immigrants from 1967–2012. Sexualities. 2015;18(4):413–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Clarke ZS. Coming to my senses: a decolonizing autoethnographic exploration of Òsunality. Widener University; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stokes JP, Miller RL, Mundhenk R. Toward an understanding of behaviourally bisexual men: the influence of context and culture. Can J Hum Sex. 1998;7(2):101–14.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cardoso FL. Some considerations on the limitations confronting the cross-cultural field of sex research. Sex Cult. 2008;12(1):21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Herdt GH. Semen transactions in Sambia culture. In: Ritualized homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984. p. 167–210.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lunsing W. Discourses and practices of homosexuality in Japan: recent contributions to the literature. Soc Sci Jpn J. 2001;4(2):269–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reese S. Should doctors ask patients about sexual orientation? MedScape; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cray A, Baker K. FAQ: collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data. Center for American Progress; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cass VC. Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model. J Homosex. 1979;4(3):219–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Francis, S. (2020). Sexual Fluidity Behind Culture. In: Rowland, D., Jannini, E. (eds) Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine. Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36221-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36222-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics