Abstract
Beyond traditional markers of age, sex, and medical history, social identities such as nationality, socioeconomic status, and sexuality are relevant to a person’s health status and prognoses. Therefore, the field of sexual medicine is strongly encouraged to include an exploration of patients’ sexual identity within the scope of routine clinical assessments. Sexual identity involves many overlapping dimensions and is directly influenced by a person’s social and cultural context. While many components of sexual identity are considered stable, the literature demonstrates that there is consistent and reliable evidence for changes in adults’ sexual attraction referred to as sexual fluidity. Distinct from bisexuality, sexual fluidity can inform everything from behavior to fantasy, without necessarily impacting orientation or identity. Women and LGB folks are most likely to experience sexual fluidity. Through this chapter, the reader can expect a thorough exploration of the patterns, pathways, and perspectives on sexual fluidity. Such exploration allows medical practitioners to consider their role in providing medical and social support for sexually fluid patients, with the ultimate goal of ensuring that persons of all sexual identities are able to access competent and informed healthcare.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Gender-neutral terminology (they, them, their, etc.), although at odds with traditional grammatical convention, is preferred in the LBG literature to gender specific terms such as he, she, him, her, himself, herself, etc.
References
Dahan R, Feldman R, Hermoni D. The importance of sexual orientation in the medical consultation. Harefuah. 2007;146(8):626–30.
Sanders JQ, Feit MN, Alper J, editors. Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records: workshop summary. Washington: National Academies Press; 2013.
Safe Zone Project. LGBTQ+ Vocabulary. https://thesafezoneproject.com/resources/vocabulary/. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.
Kinnish KK, Strassberg DS, Turner CW. Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: a multidimensional retrospective assessment. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34(2):173–83.
Radtke S. Sexual fluidity in women: how feminist research influenced evolutionary studies of same-sex behavior. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol. 2013;7(4):336.
Kitzinger C, Wilkinson S. Transitions from heterosexuality to lesbianism: the discursive production of lesbian identities. Dev Psychol. 1995;31(1):95.
Stanford University. Sexual fluidity. https://vaden.stanford.edu/health-resources/lgbtqia-health/sexual-fluidity. Accessed 8 Jan 2019.
Chivers ML, Rieger G, Latty E, Bailey JM. A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(11):736–44.
Rieger G, Savin-Williams RC. The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e40256.
Diamond LM. Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. Dev Psychol. 2000;36(2):241.
Diamond LM. The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: contributions of dynamical systems theory. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(1):73–83.
Savin-Williams RC, Ream GL. Prevalence and stability of sexual orientation components during adolescence and young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(3):385–94.
Diamond LM. A dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007;2(2):142–61.
Mock SE, Eibach RP. Stability and change in sexual orientation identity over a 10-year period in adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(3):641–8.
Manley MH, Diamond LM, van Anders SM. Polyamory, monoamory, and sexual fluidity: a longitudinal study of identity and sexual trajectories. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2015;2(2):168.
Diamond LM. Sexual fluidity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008.
Baumeister RF. Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):347.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1949;109(3):283.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH. Sexual behavior in the human female. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1998.
Savin-Williams RC, Joyner K, Rieger G. Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity during young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(1):103–10.
Diamond LM. What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(1):173.
Stokes JP, McKirnan DJ, Burzette RG. Sexual behavior, condom use, disclosure of sexuality, and stability of sexual orientation in bisexual men. J Sex Res. 1993;30(3):203–13.
Chandra A, Mosher WD, Copen C, Sionean C. Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth, National health statistics reports no 36. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.
Mereish EH, Katz-Wise SL, Woulfe J. We’re here and we’re queer: sexual orientation and sexual fluidity differences between bisexual and queer women. J Bisexuality. 2017;17(1):125–39.
Diamond LM. Was it a phase? Young women's relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(2):352.
Rosario M, Schrimshaw EW, Hunter J, Braun L. Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. J Sex Res. 2006;43(1):46–58.
Perrin EC. Sexual orientation in child and adolescent health care. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2002.
Ott MQ, Corliss HL, Wypij D, Rosario M, Austin SB. Stability and change in self-reported sexual orientation identity in young people: application of mobility metrics. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(3):519–32.
Kuhle BX, Radtke S. Born both ways: the alloparenting hypothesis for sexual fluidity in women. Evol Psychol. 2013;11(2):304.
Diamond LM. The evolution of plasticity in female-female desire. J Psychol Hum Sex. 2007;18(4):245–74.
American Psychological Association, Practice Guidelines for GLB Clients. Am Psychol. 2012;67(1):10–42.
Tolman DL, Diamond LM. Desegregating sexuality research: cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2001;12(1):33–74.
Hynie M, Lydon JE, Cote S, Wiener S. Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: the importance of internalized norms. J Sex Res. 1998;35(4):370–80.
Van Anders SM, Goldey KL. Testosterone and partnering are linked via relationship status for women and ‘relationship orientation’ for men. Horm Behav. 2010;58(5):820–6.
Kuper LE, Nussbaum R, Mustanski B. Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. J Sex Res. 2012;49(2–3):244–54.
Butler J. Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse. Feminism/postmodernism; 1990, 327.
Sin R. Does sexual fluidity challenge sexual binaries? The case of bisexual immigrants from 1967–2012. Sexualities. 2015;18(4):413–37.
Clarke ZS. Coming to my senses: a decolonizing autoethnographic exploration of Òsunality. Widener University; 2015.
Stokes JP, Miller RL, Mundhenk R. Toward an understanding of behaviourally bisexual men: the influence of context and culture. Can J Hum Sex. 1998;7(2):101–14.
Cardoso FL. Some considerations on the limitations confronting the cross-cultural field of sex research. Sex Cult. 2008;12(1):21–37.
Herdt GH. Semen transactions in Sambia culture. In: Ritualized homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984. p. 167–210.
Lunsing W. Discourses and practices of homosexuality in Japan: recent contributions to the literature. Soc Sci Jpn J. 2001;4(2):269–73.
Reese S. Should doctors ask patients about sexual orientation? MedScape; 2018.
Cray A, Baker K. FAQ: collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data. Center for American Progress; 2012.
Cass VC. Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model. J Homosex. 1979;4(3):219–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Francis, S. (2020). Sexual Fluidity Behind Culture. In: Rowland, D., Jannini, E. (eds) Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine. Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36221-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36222-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)