Skip to main content

Pleasure, Orgasm, and Sexual Mutilations in Different Cultural Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM), perhaps among the most culturally determined surgical practices in the world today, profoundly impacts quality of life in women. However, in some women who have undergone FGM, sexuality—specifically pleasure and orgasm—might be spared. Such controversial and paradoxical outcomes may be explained by adopting a dutiful sociocultural and historical perspective, allowing the clinician to manage sexual problems related to FGM while also showing respect for a woman’s cultural beliefs, needs, and expectations. While, on the one hand, it is critically important to advocate strongly for the abolition of FGM, on the other, healthcare professionals should understand the impact of FGM on women’s well-being and be trained to assess and treat possible sexual complications with a prejudice-free attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buggio L, Facchin F, Chiappa L, Barbara G, Brambilla M, Vercellini P. Psychosexual consequences of female genital mutilation and the impact of reconstructive surgery: a narrative review. Health Equity. 2019;3:36–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Donohoe M. Female genital cutting: epidemiology, consequences, and female empowerment. 2006. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/546497.

  4. Hosken F. The Hosken report: genital and sexual mutilation of females. Win News: Lexington; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Worsley A. Infibulation and female circumcision: a study of a little-known custom. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1938;45:686–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Female genital mutilation. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/.

  7. Lloyd EA. The case of the female orgasm: bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Symons D. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CL, Liao LM, Creighton SM. Female genital appearance: “normality” unfolds. BJOG. 2005;112:643–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freud S. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In: Strachey J, editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth; 1953. p. 5–185.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jannini EA, Rubio-Casillas A, Whipple B, Buisson O, Komisaruk BR, Brody S. Female orgasm(s): one, two, several. J Sex Med. 2012;9(4):956–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Veith I. Hysteria: the history of a disease. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerhard JF. Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamoir G. The discovery of meiosis by E. van Beneden, a breakthrough in the morphological phase of heredity. Int J Dev Biol. 1992;36:9–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheehan EA. Victorian Clitoridectomy. In: Lancaster RN, Di Leonardo M, editors. The gender/sexuality reader: culture, history, political economy. Abingdon: Routledge; 1997. p. 325–34.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore BE. Frigidity: a review of psychoanalytic literature. Psychoanal Q. 1964;33:323–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hite S. The Hite report: a nationwide study of female sexuality. New York: Macmillan; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Masters WH, Johnson V. Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Colson MH. Idées reçues sur la sexualité féminine. Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu; 2007. p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gräfenberg E. The role of the urethra in female orgasm. Int J Sexol. 1950;3:145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ladas KL, Whipple B, Perry J. The G-spot and other recent discoveries about human sexuality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ingelman-Sundberg A. The anterior vaginal wall as an organ for the transmission of active forces to the urethra and the clitoris. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8:50–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholas A, Brody S, De Sutter P, De Carufel F. A woman’s history of vaginal orgasm is discernible from her walk. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2119–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connell HE, Hutson JM, Anderson CR, Plenter RJ. Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. J Urol. 1998;159:1892–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Connell H, Sanjeevan KV, Hutson JM. Anatomy of the clitoris. J Urol. 2005;174:1189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Foldes P, Buisson O. The clitoral complex: a dynamic sonographic study. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1223–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gravina GL, Brandetti F, Martini P, Carosa E, Di Stasi SM, Morano S, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Measurement of the thickness of the urethrovaginal space in women with or without vaginal orgasm. J Sex Med. 2008;5:610–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jannini EA, Buisson O, Rubio-Casillas A. Beyond the G-spot: clitourethrovaginal complex anatomy in female orgasm. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buisson O, Jannini EA. Pilot echographic study of the differences in clitoral involvement following clitoral or vaginal sexual stimulation. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2734–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morison L, Scherf C, Ekpo G, Paine K, West B, Coleman R, Walraven G. The long-term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community-based survey. Tropical Med Int Health. 2001;6:643–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Iavazzo C, Sardi TA, Gkegkes ID. Female genital mutilation and infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:1137–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Toubia N. Female circumcision as a public health issue. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:712–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lightfoot-Klein H. The sexual experience and marital adjustment of genitally circumcised and infibulated females in the Sudan. J Sex Res. 1989;26(3):357–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schroeder P. Female genital mutilation – a form of child abuse. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(11):739–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rushwan H. Female genital mutilation FGM/management during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(1):99–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chibber R, El-Saleh E, El Harm J. Female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequelae continue unabated in the 21st century. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:833–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Behrendt A, Moritz S. Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1000–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Catania L, Abdulcadir O, Puppo V, Verde JB, Abdulcadir J, Abdulcadir D. Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). J Sex Med. 2007;4:1666–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sirigatti S, Catania L, Simone S, Casale S, Abdulcadir OH. Preliminary research into the psychosexual aspects of the operation of defibulation. In: Denniston GC, Grassivaro Gallo P, Hodges FM, Milos MF, Viviani F, editors. Bodily integrity and politics of circumcision. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 123–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Anis TH, Gheit SA, Saied HS, Al Kherbash SA. Arabic translation of female sexual function index and validation in an Egyptian population. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3370–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Elnashar A, El-Dien Ibrahim M, El-desoky M, Ali O, El-Sayd Mohammed Hassan M. Female sexual dysfunction in Lower Egypt. BJOG. 2007;114:201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hassanin IM, Helmy YA, Fathalla MM, Shahin AY. Prevalence and characteristics of female sexual dysfunction in a sample of women from Upper Egypt. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;108:219–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA. Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:722–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Anis TH, Gheit SA, Awad HH, Saied HS. Effects of female genital cutting on the sexual function of Egyptian women. A cross-sectional study. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2682–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mohammed GF, Hassan MM, Eyada MM. Female genital mutilation/cutting: will it continue? J Sex Med. 2014;11:2756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rouzi AA, Berg RC, Sahly N, Alkafy S, Alzaban F, Abduljabbar H. Effects of female genital mutilation/cutting on the sexual function of Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:62.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2012;9:41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Thabet SM, Thabet AS. Defective sexuality and female circumcision: the cause and the possible management. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2003;29:12–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abdulcadir J, Botsikas D, Bolmont M, Bilancioni A, Djema DA, Bianchi Demicheli F, Yaron M, Petignat P. Sexual anatomy and function in women with and without genital mutilation: a cross-sectional study. J Sex Med. 2016;13:226–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ahmadu F. Rites and wrongs: an insider/outsider reflects on power and excision. In: Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y, editors. Female circumcision in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000. p. 283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Catania L. Defibulation: a practice to improve the quality of infibulated women’s life. Female and male genital surgeries: critical intersections/astonishing issues. In: Abstract book of the 10th annual meeting American Anthropological Association. Critical intersections/dangerous issues, San Jose, California. American Anthropological Association: Arlington, VA; November 15–19, 2006, vol. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Morison LA, Dirir A, Elmi S, Warsame J, Dirir S. A study among young Somalis in London. Ethn Health. 2004;9:75–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Foldes P, Louis-Sylvestre C. Results of surgical clitoral repair after ritual excision: 453 cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34:1137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carpenter LM, Kettrey HH. (Im)perishable pleasure, (in)destructible desire: sexual themes in U.S. and English news coverage of male circumcision and female genital cutting. J Sex Res. 2015;52:841–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosen RC, Barsky JL. Normal sexual response in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2006;33:515–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nappi R, Salonia A, Traish AM, van Lunsen RH, Vardi Y, Kodiglu A, Goldstein I. Clinical biologic pathophysiologies of women’s sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2:4–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mah K, Binik YM. The nature of human orgasm: a critical review of major trends. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:823–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Komisaruk BR, Gerdes CA, Whipple B. “Complete” spinal cord injury does not block perceptual responses to genital self-stimulation in women. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:1513–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. LeBreton M, Courtois F, Journel NM, Beaulieu-Prévost D, Bélanger M, Ruffion A, Terrier JÉ. Genital sensory detection thresholds and patient satisfaction with vaginoplasty in male-to-female transgender women. J Sex Med. 2017;14:274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gizewski ER, Krause E, Karama S, Baars A, Senf W, Forsting M. There are differences in cerebral activation between females in distinct menstrual phases during viewing of erotic stimuli: a fMRI study. Exp Brain Res. 2006;174:101–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Limoncin E, Ciocca G, Gravina GL, Carosa E, Mollaioli D, Cellerino A, Mennucci A, Di Sante S, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Pregnant women’s preferences for men’s faces differ significantly from nonpregnant women. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1142–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tiihonen J, Kuikka J, Kupila J, Partanen K, Vainio P, Airaksinen J, Eronen M, Hallikainen T, Paanilaa J, Kinnunen I, Huttunena J. Increase in cerebral blood flow of right prefrontal cortex in man during orgasm. Neuroscience. 1994;170:241–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Meston CM, Frohlich PF. The neurobiology of sexual function. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:1012–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Moberg K. Plasma levels of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and oxytoxin in response to suckling, electrical stimulation of the mammary nerve and oxytocin infusion in rats. Neuroendocrinology. 1990;51:237–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Light KC, Grewen KM, Amico JA, Brownley KA, West SG, Hinderliter AL, Girdler SS. Oxytocinergic activity is linked to lower blood pressure and vascular resistance during stress in postmenopausal women on estrogen replacement. Horm Behav. 2005;47:540–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Folde P, Cuzin B, Andro A. Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Petignat P, Say L. Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies. J Sex Med. 2015;12:274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Thabet SMA, Thabet ASMA. Defective sexuality and female circumcision: the cause and the possible management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003;29:12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Antonetti-N’Diaye E, Fall S, Beltran L. Benefits of multidisciplinary care for excised women. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2015;44:862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. United Nations children’s fund. In: UNICEF, editor. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. New York: UNICEF; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  71. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: what might the future hold? New York: UNICEF; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Johansen REB, Ziyada MM, Shell-Duncan B, Kaplan AM, Leye E. Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Johnsdotter S. The impact of migration on attitudes to female genital cutting and experiences of sexual dysfunction among migrant women with FGC. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2018;10:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Abdulcadir J, Say L, Pallitto C. What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14:64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Limoncin, E., Nimbi, F.M., Jannini, E.A. (2020). Pleasure, Orgasm, and Sexual Mutilations in Different Cultural Settings. In: Rowland, D., Jannini, E. (eds) Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine. Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36222-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36221-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36222-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics