Advertisement

Finding Junctures in Learning Design and Entrepreneurship: A Case of Experiential Learning in Online Education

Chapter

Abstract

This design case focuses on an online learning experience for graduate students in a newly created online master of learning technologies at a large public university in the United States. It showcases how learner-centered design and innovative and entrepreneurial thinking may be incorporated into graduate education. Specifically, the design case discusses “Applied Learning Design,” an online graduate course that evolved into a comprehensive online learning experience. The case arises out of the fact that many programs in higher education are focused more on the transmission and replication of knowledge than on providing opportunities for learning in real-world application contexts. This chapter includes the inspiration behind the course design and the problems addressed with the design case, a design philosophy, and a detailed description of the case including context, participants’ profiles, and key design decisions. An analysis of the initial ideas, design team projects grounded on real-world educational problems, course content and evaluation, impact of design decisions, and difficulties encountered during the design case’s enactment completes the examination of the design effort and outcomes.

Keywords

Learning design Online education Experiential learning Entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher (Education ed.). Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  2. Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, A. (2013). In head-hunting, big data may not be such a big deal. The New York Times, June 19, 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/business/in-head-hunting-big-data-may-not-be-such-a-big-deal.html?pagewanted=2
  4. Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Research and Technology, 42(2), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kao, R. W. Y., Kao, K. R., & Kao, R. R. (2002). Entrepreneurism: A philosophy and a sensible alternative for the market economy. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2016). Job Outlook 2016. Bethlehem, PA: The National Association of Colleges and Employers.Google Scholar
  9. Schwier, R., Hill, J., Wager, W., & Spector, J. (2006). Where have we been and where are we going? Limiting and liberating forces in IDT. In M. Orey, V. J. McClendon, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 31, pp. 75–95). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  10. Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep learning for a digital age: Technology’s untapped potential to enrich higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Williams van Rooij, S. (2010). Project management in instructional design: ADDIE is not enough. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 852–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations