Skip to main content
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture pp 731–743Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Prison on Screen in Italy: From “Shame Therapy” Propaganda to Citizenship Programmes

  • 751 Accesses

Abstract

Italian cinema provides a nuanced view of prison, from short movies produced by the Istituto Luce, during the period 1928–1932, when the Fascist regime’s narratives dominated the Italian cinema screens and prison appeared as a fundamental tool of propaganda, through the post-World War II Neorealist stories set amongst the poor and the working class. Now there is the more contemporary “usage” of prison movies. The chapter considers the link between cinema and prison through penological theories and praxis that mirrors societal changes when it comes to defining the meanings and purposes of incarceration. Adopting a broad semiotic approach, the chapter presents an analysis of the content and ideologies behind the representation of prison on screen through the duality between the “shame therapy” propaganda and the making of movies as art therapy in prison projects. The construction of a genealogy of prison-set motion pictures is more than simply providing an overview of the representations and usages of the prison space. By exploring prison and prisoners’ place in society, we address much more complex issues relating to citizenship and belonging.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36059-7_45
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-36059-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antolisei, Francesco. 1933. “Pene e misure di sicurezza.” In Rivista Italiana di Diritto e Procedura Penale, 129–149. Tipografia Operaia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jamie. 2008. “Reel Life After Prison: Repression and Reform in Films About Release from Prison.” Probation Journal 55, no. 4: 353–368.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bondanella, Peter E. 2001. Italian Cinema: From Neorealism to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, Eamonn. 2012. “Telling Prison Stories: The Spectacle of Punishment and the Criminological Imagination.” In The Arts of Imprisonment: Control, Resistance and Empowerment, edited by L. K. Cheliotis, 47–72. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerchio, Fernando. 1940. Servizio di guerra, in «Cinema», 10 luglio 1941. 21 Nota di servizio del 9 marzo 1940 cit. in Schwarz, “Fotografia del Duce possibilmente con l’elmetto”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliotis, Leonidas K. 2010. “The Sociospatial Mechanics of Domination: Transcending the ‘Exclusion/Inclusion’ Dualism.” Law and Critique 21, no. 2: 131–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2010. “Acting on Vulnerable Others: Ethical Agency in Media Discourse.” In Roots, Rites and Sites of Resistance: The Banality of Good, edited by L. K. Cheliotis, 108–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dalle Vacche, Angela. 2014. The Body in the Mirror: Shapes of History in Italian Cinema. Vol. 179. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Autilia, Gabriele. 2005. Il fascismo senza passione. L’Istituto Luce. in L’Italia del Novecento. Le fotografie e la storia, a c. di Giovanni De Luna et al., vol. 1, t. I, Il potere da Giolitti a Mussolini (1900–1945). Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellena, Liliana. 2008. Rifare gli italiani. Spazi, appartenenze e identità nello sguardo del Luce, in L’Italia del Novecento. La fotografia e la storia. Il potere da Giolitti a Mussolini, De Luna, G., D’Autilia, G., & Criscenti, L. (2005). 1.cit., pp. 203–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassone, Elvio. 1981. La pena detentiva in Italia dall’800 alla riforma penitenziaria, Bologna 1980, in partic. pp. 53–67. «La questione criminale», 1, nr. monografico: Il codice Rocco cinquant’anni dopo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, Enrico. 1921. Relazione al progetto preliminare del codice penale, «La scuola positiva», pp. 1–130. Milano: Francesco Vallardi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgacs, David, and Stephen Gundle. 2007. Mass Culture and Italian Society from Fascism to the Cold War. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortuna, Francesco Saverio. 2004. Il carcere duro: negazione dell’ideologia penitenziaria, «Rassegna penitenziaria e criminologica», I, pp. 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, Peter, and Graham Murdock. 2000. “Culture, Communications and Political Economy.” In Mass Media and Society. Rev. 3rd ed., edited by J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 70–92. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, Dino. 1941. Bonifica umana: decennale delle leggi penali e della riforma penitenziaria. 2voll. Roma: Ministero di grazia e giustizia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grispigni, Filippo. 1942. La funzione della pena nel pensiero di Benito Mussolini, «Rivista penale» , pp. 651 e segg. Unione Tipografica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Yvonne. 2013. “Creating a Stir? Prisons, Popular Media and the Power to Reform.” In Captured by the Media: Prison Discourse in Popular Culture, edited by Paul Mason, 137–153. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehrwald, Kevin. 2017. Prison Movies: Cinema Behind Bars. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laura, Ernesto G. 2000. Le stagioni dell’aquila: storia dell’Istituto Luce. Vol. 34, 11–35. Roma: Ente dello spettacolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, Sergio. 2001. L’immagine del duce. Mussolini nelle fotografie dell’Istituto Luce, Roma: Editori Riuniti, e Id., “Niente tubi di stufa sulla testa”. L’autoritratto del fascismo, in L’Italia del Novecento, a c. di De Luna et al. cit., pp. 117–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, Andrea. 2018. “The Cineguf Years: Amateur Cinema and the Shaping of a Film Avant-Garde in Fascist Italy (1934–1943).” Film History 30, no. 1: 30–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Paul. 2003. “The Screen Machine: Cinematic Representations of Prison.” In Criminal Visions: Media Representations of Crime and Justice, edited by Paul Mason, 278–297. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, Thomas. 1997. “The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ Revisited.” Theoretical Criminology 1, no. 2: 215–234.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Melossi, Dario. 2000. “Changing Representations of the Criminal.” British Journal of Criminology 40, no. 2: 296–320.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Modona Neppi, Guido. 2007. Diritto e giustizia penale nel periodo fascista, in Penale giustizia potere. Ricerche, storiografie. Per ricordare Mario Sbriccoli, a cura di L. Lacchè, C. Latini, P. Marchetti, M. Meccarelli, Macerata, pp. 341–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkus, Karen. 1995. Bodily Regimes: Italian Advertising Under Fascism. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policek, Nicoletta. 2019. “Censorship.” In The Sage International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society, edited by D. Merskin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policek, Nicoletta, Luisa Ravagnani, and Romano Carlo Alberto. 2016. Paradigmi di ingiustizia e privatizzazione della pena in Italia [Paradigms of Injustice and the Privatizing of Punishment in Italy], Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia, no. 1: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravagnani, Luisa, Alessandro Zaniboni, and Nicoletta Policek. 2018. “Breach Processes in the Context of Alternative Measures in Italy.” In The Enforcement of Offender Supervision in Europe: Understanding Breach Processes, edited by M. Boone and N. Maguire, 198–210. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, Steven. 2008. Cinema and Fascism: Italian Film and Society, 1922–1943. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, Alfredo. 1930. Relazione a S. M. il Re del Ministro Guardasigilli (Rocco) presentata nell’udienza del 19 ottobre-VIII per l’approvazione del testo definitivo del codice penale, in Codice penale e codice di procedura penale (R. D. 19 ottobre 1930-VIII) preceduti dalle rispettive Relazioni ministeriali, Torino, pp. 3–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, Alfredo. 1931. Relazione a S. M. il Re del Ministro Guardasigilli (Rocco) per l’applicazione del testo definitivo del regolamento per gli istituti di prevenzione e di pena, «Rivista di diritto penitenziario», 3, pp. 581–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorlin, Pierre. 2006. Italian National Cinema. New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Surette, Ray. 2014. Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Toronto: Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, Keith. 2001. Compassion, Morality and the Media. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanelli, Rodanthi, Majid Yar, and Martin O’Brien. 2005. “‘Con Me If You Can’ Exploring Crime in the American Cinematic Imagination.” Theoretical Criminology 9, no. 1: 97–117.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Valier, Claire. 2000. “Looking Daggers: A Psychoanalytic Reading of the Scene of Punishment.” Punishment & Society 2, no. 4: 379–394.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Venturini, Alfonso. 2015. La politica cinematografica del regime fascista. Rome: Carocci editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loic. 2001. Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh. Punishment & Society 3, no. 1: 95–134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loic. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The New Government of Social Insecurity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David, and Sean O’Sullivan. 2005. Re-theorizing the Penal Reform Functions of the Prison Film: Revelation, Humanization, Empathy and Benchmarking. Theoretical Criminology 9, no. 4: 471–491.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zamponi-Falasca, Simonetta. 1997. Fascist Spectacle. The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini’s Italy. Vol. 28. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor in Policing & Criminology, University of Cumbria, Institute of Business, Industry & Leadership, Carlisle, UK

    Nicoletta Policek

Authors
  1. Nicoletta Policek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicoletta Policek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Open Access College, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Marcus Harmes

  2. Open Access College, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Meredith Harmes

  3. Open Access College, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Barbara Harmes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Policek, N. (2020). Prison on Screen in Italy: From “Shame Therapy” Propaganda to Citizenship Programmes. In: Harmes, M., Harmes, M., Harmes, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Incarceration in Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36059-7_45

Download citation