Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparent Lobbying and Democracy

Abstract

Lobbying is a standard part of modern democracy and is here to stay. Even if there are still voices in the public discourse that consider lobbying to be detrimental to democracy, there is a widespread consensus among academicians and political practitioners that efforts to ban lobbying altogether would be futile and counterproductive.

This book argues that the key to drive away concerns about lobbying and make it fully beneficial to democracy is to set clear and predictable rules based on transparency and public accountability of those who are a part of the lobbying process. As the empirical data in this book show, it is not easy to come up with rules that are comprehensive, balanced, and resistant to circumvention and unintended interpretations, and reflect everyone’s preferences, good practices, and common standards. As some former professional lobbyists admit, not even lobbying regulations in the United States, despite their long history of development, are today effective and allow for what is basically a legal bribe (Williams, I was a lobbyist for more than 6 years. I quit. My conscience couldn’t take it anymore. Vox.com. January 5, 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • APSC. (2005). Foundation of Governance in Australian Public Service. Australian Public Service Committee. Retrieved September 26, 2008, from http://www.apsc.gov.au/foundations/foundations.pdf.

  • Císař, O. (2008). Politický aktivismus v České republice. Sociální hnutí a občanská společnost v období transformace a evropeizace [Political Activism in the Czech Republic. Social Movements and Civil Society in the Period of Transformation and Europeanization]. Brno: CSDK.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoE. (2017). Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the legal regulation of lobbying activities in the context of public decision making. Council of Europe, Strasbourgh. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680700a40.

  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., Linz, J. J., & Lipset, S. M. (1990). Politics in Developing Countries. Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The quality of democracy: An overview. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvořáková, V., Bič, J., Druláková, R., Laboutková, Š., Müller, K. B., & Vymětal, P. (2010). Evropeizace veřejné sféry [Europeanization of the Public Sphere]. Praha: C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2001). European Governance. A White Paper. Brussels: European Commission. COM(2001) 428 final. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf.

  • EC. (2006). Green Paper: European Transparency Initiative [online]. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. COM(2006) 194 final. 17 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. D. (2018). Transparency and corruption: A general analysis. University of Chicago Legal Forum 117, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2018-09, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2018-03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabudi, P. J. (2008). Good Governance: Definition and Implications. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from http://tanzania.fes-international.de/doc/good-governance.pdf.

  • Lauth, H. J. (2016). The internal relationship of the dimension of democracy: The relevance of trade-offs for measuring the quality of democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0199512116667630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., Loyaza, N., & Reis Soarez, R. (2001). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Policy Research Working Paper 2708. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poluha, E., & Rosendahl, M. (2002). Contesting ‘Good’ Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is… and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimral, V. (2017). Regulating lobbying in Europe: No model fits all? In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum 2017 (pp. 456–465). Liberec: Technical University of Liberec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2015). Lobbying in Europe: Hidden Influence, Privileged Access. Berlin: Transparency International. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from http://files.transparency.org/content/download/1909/12646/file/2015_LobbyingInEurope_EN.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. A UNDP Policy Document. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved April 3, 2008, from http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy/.

  • UNESCAP. (2008). What is Good Governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.pdf.

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2018, January 5). I was a lobbyist for more than 6 years. I quit. My conscience couldn’t take it anymore. Vox.com. Retrieved July 27, 2019, from https://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/6/29/15886936/political-lobbying-lobbyist-big-money-politics.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Šárka Laboutková .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laboutková, Š., Šimral, V., Vymětal, P. (2020). Conclusion. In: Transparent Lobbying and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36044-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics