Abstract
Autonomous indoor robots are supposed to accomplish tasks, like serve a cup, which involve manipulation actions, where task and motion planning levels are coupled. In both planning levels and execution phase, several source of failures can occur. In this paper, an interpretation ontology covering several sources of failures in automated planning and also during the execution phases is introduced with the purpose of working the planning more informed and the execution prepared for recovery. The proposed failure interpretation ontological module covers: (1) geometric failures, that may appear when e.g. the robot can not reach to grasp/place an object, there is no free-collision path or there is no feasible Inverse Kinematic (IK) solution. (2) hardware related failures that may appear when e.g. the robot in a real environment requires to be re-calibrated (gripper or arm), or it is sent to a non-reachable configuration. (3) software agent related failures, that may appear when e.g. the robot has software components that fail like when an algorithm is not able to extract the proper features. The paper describes the concepts and the implementation of failure interpretation ontology in several foundations like DUL and SUMO, and presents an example showing different situations in planning demonstrating the range of information the framework can provide for autonomous robots.
This work was partially funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the Collaborative Research Center 1320, EASE, and by the Spanish Government through the project DPI2016-80077-R. M. Diab is supported by the Spanish Government through the grants FPI 2017.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Notes
References
Diab, M., Akbari, A., Ud Din, M., Rosell, J.: PMK - a knowledge processing framework for autonomous robotics perception and manipulation. Sensors 19(5), 1166 (2019)
Tenorth, M., Beetz, M.: Representations for robot knowledge in the KnowRob framework. Artif. Intell. 247, 151–169 (2017). Special Issue on AI and Robotics
Akbari, A., Lagriffoul, F., Rosell, J.: Combined heuristic task and motion planning for bi-manual robots. Auton. Robots, 1–16 (2018)
Beßler, D., Pomarlan, M., Akbari, A., Muhayyuddin, Diab, M., Rosell, J., Bateman, J., Beetz, M.: Assembly planning in cluttered environments through heterogeneous reasoning. In: Trollmann, F., Turhan, A.Y. (eds.) KI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 201–214. Springer, Cham (2018)
Zhou, X., Ren, Y.: Failure ontology of board-level electronic product for reliability design. In: The Proceedings of 2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, pp. 1086–1091, June 2011
Kootbally, Z., Schlenoff, C., Antonishek, B., Proctor, F., Kramer, T., Harrison, W., Downs, A., Gupta, S.: Enabling robot agility in manufacturing kitting applications. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 25, 1–20 (2018)
Srivastava, S., Riano, L., Russell, S., Abbeel, P.: Using classical planners for tasks with continuous operators in robotics. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013)
Caldiran, O., Haspalamutgil, K., Ok, A., Palaz, C., Erdem, E., Patoglu, V.: Bridging the gap between high-level reasoning and low-level control. In: International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 342–354. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Caldiran, O., Haspalamutgil, K., Ok, A., Palaz, C., Erdem, E., Patoglu, V.: From discrete task plans to continuous trajectories. In: Proceedings of BTAMP (2009)
Duarte, B.B., Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Guizzardi, R.S., Souza, V.E.: Towards an ontology of software defects, errors and failures. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 349–362. Springer, Cham (2018)
Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 2001, pp. 2–9. ACM (2001)
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: WonderWeb deliverable D18 ontology library. Technical report, IST Project 2001-33052 WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web, August 2003
Kam, H.R., Lee, S.H., Park, T., Kim, C.H.: RViz: a toolkit for real domain data visualization. Telecommun. Syst. 60(2), 337–345 (2015)
Rosell, J., Pérez, A., Aliakbar, A., Muhayyuddin, Palomo, L., García, N.: The Kautham project: a teaching and research tool for robot motion planning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–8, September 2014
Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: Web Ontology Language: OWL, pp. 67–92. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Mossakowski, T., Codescu, M., Neuhaus, F., Kutz, O.: The distributed ontology, modeling and specification language – DOL. In: The Road to Universal Logic, pp. 489–520. Springer, Cham (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Diab, M. et al. (2020). An Ontology for Failure Interpretation in Automated Planning and Execution. In: Silva, M., Luís Lima, J., Reis, L., Sanfeliu, A., Tardioli, D. (eds) Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference. ROBOT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1092. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35989-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35990-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)