Abstract
Prisons in the United States are often considered incubators for the exchange of radical ideas. Global terrorism and the rise of homegrown Islamic radicalization has exacerbated these concerns and has been the subject of congressional hearings to prevent Qutbism from infiltrating the U.S. prison system. Qutbism, the foundation of radical Islamic extremism, espouses violence against non-Muslim communities, particularly the United States. One option that has been proposed to mitigate prison radicalization revolves around an effective housing strategy. Current discussions on this topic consider either integrating radical inmates with the regular population or keeping them separate in a segregated housing unit. To determine the efficacy of each housing strategy, we have constructed an agent-based model that uses norm crystallization to simulate prison radicalization. In the model, we vary the density of the inmate population, the mobility of radical inmates, and the initial population of radical inmates. With these three variables we compare baseline, integration and segregation models to determine the attractiveness of Qutbism among prison inmates, the number of converts for both radical Islam and some other form of extremism, and the time it takes to crystallize norms. The results provide valuable insights in determining an effective housing strategy. While the absence of Islamic radicals does not outright prevent prison radicalization, a housing strategy of segregation both reduce their influence over the inmate population and increases the time it takes to disseminate Qutbism. The implications of this research are important to understanding prison radicalization which has been neglected as a method of inquiry into terrorism studies. A greater emphasis has been placed on explanations of radicalization, and the detection of Islamic terrorists. However, the apprehension of radical Islamic terrorists within the United States places them near other criminal offenders. Determining the most effective housing strategy is important to mitigate the spread of Qutbism in U.S. prisons and reduce the potential risks to public safety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Eikmeier, D. (2007). Qutbism: an ideology of Islamic-fascism. Parameters, 37, 85–98.
Veldhuis, T., & Kessels, F. (2013). Thinking before leaping: the need for more and structural data analysis in detention and rehabilitation of extremist offenders. The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
Testimony of Jerome Bjelopera. (2015). Terror inmates: countering violent extremism in prison and beyond, Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, House of Representatives, 114th Cong. 1.
Testimony of Daveed Gartenstein-Ross. (2006) Prison radicalization: are terrorist cells forming in U.S. cell blocks? Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, U.S. Senate, 109th Cong. 2.
Hamm, M. (2007). Terrorist recruitment in American correctional institutions: an exploratory study of non-traditional faith groups (document no. 220957). U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Mulcahy, E., Merrington, S., & Bell, P. (2013). The radicalisation of prison inmates: exploring recruitment, religion and prison vulnerability. Journal of Human Security, 9(1), 4–14.
Daly, S., & Gerwehr, S. (2006). Al-Qaida: terrorist selection and recruitment. In D. Kamien (Ed.), The McGraw-Hill handbook of homeland security (pp. 73–89). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Jackson, J. M. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. F. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169.
Silber, M., & Bhatt, A. (2007). Radicalization in the west: the homegrown threat. New York, NY: New York Police Department.
Munjal, P., Kumar, S., Kumar, L., & Banati, A. (2017). Opinion dynamics through natural phenomenon of grain growth and population migration. In Hybrid intelligence for social networks (pp. 161–175). Cham: Springer.
Sharma, I., Chourasia, B., Bhatia, A., & Goyal, R. (2016). On the role of evangelism in consensus formation: a simulation approach. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 4(1), 16.
Committee of Homeland Security. (2012). Compilation of hearings on Islamist radicalization. Vol. 1 (Publication No. 112–9). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
University of Southern California Office for the Protection of Research Subjects. (n.d.). Research with prisoners. Retrieved from the University of Southern California website: https://oprs.usc.edu/irb-review/research-with-prisoners/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roberts, R.J., Collins, A. (2020). Islamic Extremism and the Crystallization of Norms: AnAgent-Based Model of Prison Radicalization. In: Carmichael, T., Yang, Z. (eds) Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the Computational Social Science Society of the Americas. CSSSA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35902-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35902-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35901-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35902-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)