Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 328 Accesses

Abstract

We independently implemented and studied the nest-site selection model described in Passino, K. M., and Seeley, T. D., “Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms,” 2006, focusing on the default parameter values they obtained by field calibration. We focus on aspects of the model pertaining both to imitation and social learning and to the model as kind of metaheuristic. Among other things, we find that the model is robust to different parameterizations of social learning, but that at least a modicum of social learning is essential for successful nest-site selection (in the model). Regarding the model as a metaheuristic, we find that it robustly produces good but significantly non-optimal nest-site selections. Instead of a single-criterion metaheuristic, the algorithm is best seen as balancing three objectives: choose the best of the available sites in the neighborhood, make the choice quickly, minimize risk of failing to choose a site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to Tony Kroch for directing our attention to this example; he is, of course, not responsible for our interpretation.

References

  1. Blum, C., & Roli, A. (2003). Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3), 268–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogacz, R., Usher, M., Zhang, J., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1655–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an ‘experimental ethnography’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Social learning: An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimbrough, S. O. (2012). Agents, games, and evolution: Strategies at work and play. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimbrough, S. O., & Lau, H. C. (2016). Business analytics for decision making. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture & synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikolaev, A. G., & Jacobson, S. H. (2010). Simulated annealing. In Handbook of metaheuristics, M. Gendreau & J.-Y. Potvin (Eds.). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (2nd ed., Vol. 146, pp. 1–39). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Passino, K. M., & Seeley, T. D. (2006). Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(3), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rendell, L., Boyd, R., Cownden, D., Enquist, M., Eriksson, K., Feldman, M. W., et al. (2010). Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science, 328, 208–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribeiro, C., & Hansen, P. (Eds.) (2001). Essays and surveys in metaheuristics. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seeley, T. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108(3), 550–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voß, S. (2001). Metaheuristics: The state of the art. In Local search for planning and scheduling, A. Nareyek (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 2148, pp. 1–23). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Voudouris, C., & Tsang, E. (2003). Guided local search. In Handbook of metaheuristics, F. Glover & G. Kochengerger, (Eds.) (pp. 185–218). Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven O. Kimbrough .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Clark, R., Kimbrough, S.O. (2020). What Can Honeybees Tell Us About Social Learning?. In: Carmichael, T., Yang, Z. (eds) Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the Computational Social Science Society of the Americas. CSSSA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35902-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics