Skip to main content

Abstract

This study mainly dealt with the compounds of culture, economy, religion, history, education, language, sports politics, law, gender, partialism, multiculturalism and affirmative action in globally and locally written textbooks just as the compounds of cross-cultural communication, inner circle, expanding circle, outer circle, cultural awareness and national identity were analyzed based on the data obtained from the interviews and the questionnaire. The main purpose of this chapter is to introduce methodological points leading the study. Therefore, this chapter contains a meticulous description of research aim, design of the study, settings where the study was conducted, samples composed of students and teachers at government schools. Instruments, procedures for data collection and analyses, measures serving to the validity and reliability of the instruments are thoroughly stated as well. Finally, yet importantly, ethical concerns were given priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and practice in language studies, 2(4), 784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feixas, G. (1990). Personal construct theory and systemic therapies: Parallel or convergent trends? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fochtman, D. (2008). Phenomenology in pediatric cancer nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25(4), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2012). What is phenomenology? In Phenomenology (Palgrave philosophy today). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearing, R. (2004). Bracketing in research: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1429–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. B. (1990). World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köksal, D., & Ulum, Ö. G. (2017). Hegemonic practices in EFL textbooks designed for polish students. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference “Cross-Curricularity in Language Education”. Krotoszyn, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, K., & Willis, D. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contribution to nursing knowledge. Quality Health Research, 14, 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speziale, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulum, Ö. G., & Bada, E. (2016). Cultural elements in EFL course books. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojnar, D., & Swanson, K. (2007). Phenomenology: An exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, S. D. (2018). Phenomenology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/. Accessed 8 June 2018.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri. Turkey: Seckin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ulum, Ö.G., Köksal, D. (2019). Methodology. In: Ideology and Hegemony of English Foreign Language Textbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35809-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35809-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35808-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35809-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics