Skip to main content

Using Convolutional Neural Network in Cross-Domain Argumentation Mining Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11940))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Argument Mining has become a remarkable research area in computational argumentation and Natural Language Processing fields. Despite its importance, most of the current proposals are restricted to a text type (e.g., Essays, web comments) on a specific domain and fall behind expectations when applied to cross-domain data. This paper presents a new framework for Argumentation Mining to detect argumentative segments and their components automatically using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). We focus on both (1) argumentative sentence detection and (2) argument components detection tasks. Based on different corpora, we investigate the performance of CNN on both in-domain level and cross-domain level. The investigation shows challenging results in comparison with classic machine learning models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://code.google.com/p/word2vec/.

  2. 2.

    https://academichelp.net/.

  3. 3.

    https://theshortstory.co.uk.

  4. 4.

    https://www.quora.com/.

References

  1. Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 46–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 2: Short Papers), pp. 208–212 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 16(2), 10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: MARGOT: a web server for argumentation mining. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 292–303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aker, A., et al.: What works and what does not: classifier and feature analysis for argument mining. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 91–96 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hua, X., Nikolov, M., Badugu, N., Wang, L.: Argument mining for understanding peer reviews. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1903.10104 (2019)

  7. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1408.5882 (2014)

  9. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., LeCun, Y.: Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 649–657 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dos Santos, C., Gatti, M.: Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of short texts. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 69–78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, Y., Jernite, Y., Sontag, D., Rush, A.M.: Character-aware neural language models. In: Proceedings of 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laha, A., Raykar, V.: An empirical evaluation of various deep learning architectures for bi-sequence classification tasks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1607.04853 (2016)

  13. Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays. Comput. Linguist. 43(3), 619–659 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Daxenberger, J., Eger, S., Habernal, I., Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: What is the essence of a claim? Cross-domain claim identification. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1704.07203 (2017)

  15. Lugini, L., Litman, D.: Argument component classification for classroom discussions. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 57–67 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Habernal, I., Eckle-Kohler, J., Gurevych, I.: Argumentation mining on the web from information seeking perspective. In: Proceedings of ArgNLP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abdel-Hamid, O., Mohamed, A.R., Jiang, H., Penn, G.: Applying convolutional neural networks concepts to hybrid NN-HMM model for speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4277–4280 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Khatib, K., Wachsmuth, H., Hagen, M., Köhler, J., Stein, B.: Cross-domain mining of argumentative text through distant supervision. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1395–1404 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wachsmuth, H., et al.: Building an argument search engine for the web. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 49–59 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. O’Reilly Media Inc., Newton (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, M., Gao, Y., Wen, H., Du, Y., Liu, H., Wang, H.: Joint RNN model for argument component boundary detection. In: Proceeding of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 57–62 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ajjour, Y., Chen, W.F., Kiesel, J., Wachsmuth, H., Stein, B.: Unit segmentation of argumentative texts. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 118–128 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stab, C., Miller, T., Gurevych, I.: Cross-topic argument mining from heterogeneous sources using attention-based neural networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1802.05758 (2018)

  24. Guggilla, C., Miller, T., Gurevych, I.: CNN-and LSTM-based claim classification in online user comments. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 2740–2751 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sparck Jones, K.: A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J. Doc. 28(1), 11–21 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rihab Bouslama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bouslama, R., Ayachi, R., Amor, N.B. (2019). Using Convolutional Neural Network in Cross-Domain Argumentation Mining Framework. In: Ben Amor, N., Quost, B., Theobald, M. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11940. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35514-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35514-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35513-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35514-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics