Abstract
Chapter 4 presents five case studies from the Coral Project’s qualitative data to queer heteronormative, cisnormative narratives of intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) that reproduce binaries of male/female, victim/perpetrator in relation to the public story of domestic violence and abuse, and to demonstrate the importance of understanding relationship contexts before making an assessment of what type of IPVA is being used. We include an outline of how we have categorised participants’ accounts, informed by Johnson’s typology. Whilst interview participants for this chapter were selected because they appeared quantitatively to be ‘perpetrators’ of IPVA and to be in relationships characterised by mutual abuse, the selected case studies problematise these assumptions and argue for closer attention to the different kinds of IPVA that are enacted and the relationship contexts that they are enacted within. Through these case studies, we make two key points: first, that patriarchal heteronormativity and cisnormativity are relevant to the experiences of LGB and/or T+ people who are victimised by coercively controlling partners; and second, that victims/survivors who use space for reaction in response to coercively controlling partners find it difficult to recognise their victimisation, in turn inhibiting their opportunities for help-seeking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, N. L., Buick, J. D., Kim, S. R., Moniz, S., & Nava, K. L. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69(3–4), 182–192.
Barnes, R. (2011). ‘Suffering in a silent vacuum’: Woman-to-woman partner abuse as a challenge to the lesbian feminist vision. Feminism & Psychology, 21(2), 233–239.
Barnes, R. (2013). ‘She expected her women to be pretty, subservient, dinner on the table at six’: Problematising the narrative of egalitarianism in lesbian relationships through accounts of woman-to-woman partner abuse. In T. Sanger & Y. Taylor (Eds), Mapping intimacies: Relations, exchanges, affects (pp. 130–149). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cannon, C., Lauve-Moon, K., & Buttell, F. (2015). Re-theorizing intimate partner violence through post-structural feminism, queer theory, and sociology of gender. Social Sciences, 4, 668–687.
Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In E. Fattah (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system (pp. 17–30). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Donovan, C., & Barnes, R. (in press). Help-seeking among lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender victims/survivors of domestic violence and abuse: The impacts of cisgendered heteronormativity and invisibility. Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319882088
Donovan, C., Barnes, R., & Nixon, C. (2014). The Coral Project: Exploring abusive behaviours in lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender relationships: Interim report. Sunderland and Leicester: University of Sunderland and University of Leicester. Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/criminology/documents/coral-project-interim-report
Donovan, C., & Hester, M. (2011). Exploring emotion work in domestically abusive relationships. In J. Ristock (Ed.), Intimate partner violence in LGBTQ lives (pp. 81–101). New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Donovan, C., & Hester, M. (2014). Domestic violence and sexuality: What’s love got to do with it? Bristol: Policy Press.
Fraser, H. (2008). In the name of love: Women’s narratives of love and abuse. Toronto: Women’s Press, an imprint of Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
Gadd, D., & Corr, M. (2017). Beyond typologies: Foregrounding meaning and motive in domestic violence perpetration. Deviant Behavior, 38(7), 781–791.
Guadalupe-Diaz, X. L., & Jasinski, J. (2017). ‘I wasn’t a priority, I wasn’t a victim’: Challenges in help seeking for transgender survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 23(6), 772–792.
Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34.
Hassouneh, D., & Glass, N. (2008). The influence of gender role stereotyping on women’s experiences of female same-sex intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 310–325.
Hodes, C., & Mennicke, A. (2019). Is it conflict or abuse? A practice note for furthering differential assessment and response. Journal of Clinical Social Work, 47(2), 176–184.
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.
Kelly, L. (2003). The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review, 73, 139–144.
Lempert, L. (1997). The other side of help: Negative effects in the help-seeking processes of abused women. Qualitative Sociology, 20(2), 289–309.
Lloyd, S., & Emery, B. (2000). The dark side of courtship: Physical and sexual aggression. London: Sage.
McDonald, C. (2012). The social context of woman-to-woman intimate partner abuse (WWIPA). Journal of Family Violence, 27(7), 635–645.
Messinger, A. M. (2017). LGBTQ intimate partner violence: Lessons for policy, practice, and research. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Myhill, A. (2017). Measuring domestic violence: Context is everything. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1, 33–44.
Ristock, J. (2002). No more secrets: Violence in lesbian relationships. London and New York: Routledge.
Stark, E. (2010). Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity/asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62, 201–211.
Stark, E. (2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12, 199–217.
Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104.
Velonis, A. J. (2016). He never did anything you typically think of as abuse: Experiences with violence in controlling and non-controlling relationships in a non-agency sample of women. Violence Against Women, 22(9), 1031–1054.
Wilcox, P. (2006). Surviving domestic violence: Gender, poverty and agency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donovan, C., Barnes, R. (2020). Barriers to Recognising Domestic Violence and Abuse: Power, Resistance and the Re-storying of ‘Mutual Abuse’. In: Queering Narratives of Domestic Violence and Abuse. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35403-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35403-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35402-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35403-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)