Skip to main content

Giant Cell and Hypersensitivity Myocarditis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Myocarditis

Abstract

Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) and hypersensitivity myocarditis (HSM) are both rare inflammatory diseases of the myocardium that are rapidly progressive and carry poor prognosis. Histologically both diseases have eosinophilic infiltration but in the case of HSM the infiltration is predominantly in the perivascular area. GCM is characterized by the presence of giant cells and necrosis. Patients affected by these forms of myocarditis tend to present with heart failure symptoms and ventricular arrhythmias. Endomyocardial biopsy is highly sensitive for the diagnosis of GCM, while in the case of HSM it may aid in the diagnosis but sensitivities have not been reported. Initiation of immunosuppressive therapies along with guideline directed heart failure therapy improves survival in patients with GCM. In the case of HSM, withdrawal of the offending agent along with heart failure therapies allows for myocardial recovery. In some instances patients are hemodynamically unstable and require mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to recovery or as a bridge to transplant. Survival post-transplant for GCM is similar to other forms of cardiomyopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper LT Jr, Berry GJ, Shabetai R. Idiopathic giant-cell myocarditis--natural history and treatment. Multicenter Giant Cell Myocarditis Study Group Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(26):1860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltykow S. Uber diffuse myokarditis. Virchows Archiv fur Pathologische Anatomie. 1905;182:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okura Y, et al. A clinical and histopathologic comparison of cardiac sarcoidosis and idiopathic giant cell myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(2):322–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies M, Pomerance A, Teare R. Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis—a distinctive clinico-pathological entity. Br Heart J. 1975;37:192–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maleszewski JJ, Larsen BT, Castonguay MC, Youg RK, Cooper LT, Halushka MK. Is there an intermediate diagnostic category between sarcoidosis and idiopathic giant cell myocarditis? Lab Investig. 2014;94:90A–5A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaideeswar P, Cooper LT. Giant cell myocarditis: clinical and pathological features in an Indian population. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2013;22(1):70–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okada R, Wakafuji S. Myocarditis in autopsy. Heart Vessels Suppl. 1985;1:23–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekstrom K, et al. Long-term outcome and its predictors in giant cell myocarditis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(12):1452–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winters GL, Costanzo-Nordin MR. Pathological findings in 2300 consecutive endomyocardial biopsies. Mod Pathol. 1991;4(4):441–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper LT Jr, ElAmm C. Giant cell myocarditis. Diagnosis and treatment. Herz. 2012;37(6):632–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katta N, Balla S, Aggarwal K. Clozapine-induced hypersensitivity myocarditis presenting as sudden cardiac death. Autops Case Rep. 2016;6(4):9–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fench A, Weller C. Interstitial myocarditis following the clinical and experimental use of sulfonamide drugs. Am J Pathol. 1942;18:122.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fenoglio JJ Jr, McAllister HA Jr, Mullick FG. Drug related myocarditis. I. Hypersensitivity myocarditis. Hum Pathol. 1981;12(10):900–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung CC, et al. Eosinophilic myocarditis. Am J Med Sci. 2017;354(5):486–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Engler RJ, et al. A prospective study of the incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis and new onset cardiac symptoms following smallpox and influenza vaccination. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brambatti M, et al. Eosinophilic myocarditis: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2363–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniels PR, et al. Giant cell myocarditis as a manifestation of drug hypersensitivity. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2000;9(5):287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burke AP, et al. Hypersensitivity myocarditis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115(8):764–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsen BT, et al. Atrial giant cell myocarditis: a distinctive clinicopathologic entity. Circulation. 2013;127(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Law KK, et al. Echocardiographic features of atrial myocarditis with giant cells: a case report. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(10):1073–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brambatti M, et al. Eosinophilic myocarditis characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2363–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper LT Jr. Acute heart failure due to fulminant and giant cell myocarditis. Herz. 2006;31(8):767–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blauwet LA, Cooper LT. Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18(6):733–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitoff PR, et al. Giant cell myocarditis in a patient with a spondyloarthropathy after a drug hypersensitivity reaction. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(9):1138 e7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper LT Jr. Giant cell and granulomatous myocarditis. Heart Fail Clin. 2005;1(3):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maleszewski JJ, et al. Long-term risk of recurrence, morbidity and mortality in giant cell myocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(12):1733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cooper LT, et al. Usefulness of immunosuppression for Giant cell myocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(11):1535–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Taliercio CP, Olney BA, Lie JT. Myocarditis related to drug hypersensitivity. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985;60(7):463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ammirati E, et al. Giant cell myocarditis successfully treated with antithymocyte globuline and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 21 days. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016;17(Suppl 2):e151–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper LT. Giant cell myocarditis in children. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2007;24(1):47–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bozkurt B, et al. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for specific dilated cardiomyopathies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(23):e579–646.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Caforio AL, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636–48. 2648a-2648d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shields RC, et al. The role of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy for idiopathic giant cell myocarditis. J Card Fail. 2002;8(2):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kandolin R, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of giant-cell myocarditis in the era of combined immunosuppression. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stiermaier T, et al. Biventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with suspected myocarditis: feasibility, complication rate and additional diagnostic value. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cooper LT, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(24):3076–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stone JR, et al. Recommendations for processing cardiovascular surgical pathology specimens: a consensus statement from the Standards and Definitions Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012;21(1):2–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shah Z, et al. National trends and procedural complications from endomyocardial biopsy: results from the National inpatient sample, 2007-2014. Cardiology. 2018;141(3):125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bennett MK, et al. Evaluation of the role of endomyocardial biopsy in 851 patients with unexplained heart failure from 2000-2009. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(4):676–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Slawek S, et al. Endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral access - still safe and valuable diagnostic tool. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chimenti C, Frustaci A. Contribution and risks of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with cardiomyopathies: a retrospective study over a 28-year period. Circulation. 2013;128(14):1531–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferreira VM, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3158–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lurz P, et al. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis: the MyoRacer-trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(15):1800–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kotanidis CP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(11):1583–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Elamm CA, et al. Heart transplantation in giant cell myocarditis: analysis of the united network for organ sharing registry. J Card Fail. 2017;23(7):566–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Patel AD, et al. Sirolimus for recurrent giant cell myocarditis after heart transplantation: a unique therapeutic strategy. Am J Ther. 2018;26(5):600–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cooper LT Jr, et al. Usefulness of immunosuppression for giant cell myocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(11):1535–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bleeker JS, et al. Treatment-refractory idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome: pitfalls and progress with use of novel drugs. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(7):703–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Grabellus F, et al. Resolved hypersensitivity myocarditis after ventricular circulatory assist. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(6):2102–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yancy CW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(6):776–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yancy CW, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(13):1476–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ponikowski P, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(12):1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Brilakis ES, et al. Survival outcomes of patients with giant cell myocarditis bridged by ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2000;46(5):569–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Eid SM, et al. Resolution of giant cell myocarditis after extended ventricular assistance. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(1):138–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Marelli D, et al. Support with the BVS 5000 assist device during treatment of acute giant-cell myocarditis. Tex Heart Inst J. 2003;30(1):50–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Stoica SC, et al. Ventricular assist surprise: giant cell myocarditis or sarcoidosis? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(6):2072–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tschope C, et al. Mechanical unloading by fulminant myocarditis: LV-IMPELLA, ECMELLA, BI-PELLA, and PROPELLA concepts. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018;12(2):116–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Annamalai SK, et al. The Impella microaxial flow catheter is safe and effective for treatment of myocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock: an analysis from the global cVAD registry. J Card Fail. 2018;24(10):706–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Montero S, et al. Fulminant giant-cell myocarditis on mechanical circulatory support: management and outcomes of a French multicentre cohort. Int J Cardiol. 2018;253:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cooper LT, Zehr KJ. Biventricular assist device placement and immunosuppression as therapy for necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2(10):544–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schrage B, et al. Unloading of the left ventricle during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in cardiogenic shock. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(12):1035–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Singh TP, et al. Total lymphoid irradiation: new therapeutic option for refractory giant cell myocarditis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(4):492–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Takkenberg JJ, et al. Eosinophilic myocarditis in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):714–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kanai-Yoshizawa S, et al. Hypersensitivity myocarditis and outcome after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(5):553–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Meyer T, et al. Giant cell myocarditis due to Coxsackie B2 virus infection. Cardiology. 1997;88(3):296–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dennert R, et al. Giant cell myocarditis triggered by a parvovirus B19 infection. Int J Cardiol. 2009;134(1):115–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Drut RM, Drut R. Giant-cell myocarditis in a newborn with congenital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection: an immunohistochemical study on the origin of the giant cells. Pediatr Pathol. 1986;6(4):431–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kodama M, et al. A novel experimental model of giant cell myocarditis induced in rats by immunization with cardiac myosin fraction. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1990;57(2):250–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Li Y, et al. Mimicry and antibody-mediated cell signaling in autoimmune myocarditis. J Immunol. 2006;177(11):8234–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mascaro-Blanco A, et al. Consequences of unlocking the cardiac myosin molecule in human myocarditis and cardiomyopathies. Autoimmunity. 2008;41(6):442–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Asimaki A, et al. Altered desmosomal proteins in granulomatous myocarditis and potential pathogenic links to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(5):743–U240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Ogbogu PU, Rosing DR, Horne MK 3rd. Cardiovascular manifestations of hypereosinophilic syndromes. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2007;27(3):457–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Schnyder B, Brockow K. Pathogenesis of drug allergy--current concepts and recent insights. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(9):1376–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Attia ZI, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):70–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ebbert MTW, et al. Conserved DNA methylation combined with differential frontal cortex and cerebellar expression distinguishes C9orf72-associated and sporadic ALS, and implicates SERPINA1 in disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;134(5):715–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Myers JM, et al. Cardiac myosin-Th17 responses promote heart failure in human myocarditis. JCI Insight. 2016;1(9):e85851.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie T. Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gonzalez, Y.O., Cooper, L.T. (2020). Giant Cell and Hypersensitivity Myocarditis. In: Caforio, A. (eds) Myocarditis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35276-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35276-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35275-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35276-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics