Abstract
This chapter focuses on three Colombian high school teachers’ appropriation of second language (L2) classroom dynamic assessment (DA) to analyze the bidirectional relationship between theory and practice. Situated within Vygotskian sociocultural theory, DA integrates instruction and assessment into unified activity in that teachers assess learners’ language ability through a process that involves tailored teaching, or mediation, according to difficulties that learners experience (Lantolf and Poehner, J Appl Linguist 1(1):49–72, 2004). While L2 DA research has documented changes to teacher practice through the implementation of DA, far less work has taken account of insights into DA that may be obtained from teachers and learners. Such a reciprocal relation between conceptual work and practice is a key feature of praxis. In this chapter, we report findings from interviews conducted with three English-as-foreign-language (EFL) teachers who participated in a professional development series on DA (Davin et al., Lang Teach Res 21(5):632–651, 2017). In Phase One of this research, these teachers worked closely with us as they studied and implemented DA procedures in their classrooms. To capture enduring change and offer insight into the further development of DA principles and frameworks, we interviewed each teacher 2 years later. Our findings revealed that teachers recontextualized the concept of DA into a theory of their own practice. Findings suggest implications for DA implementation, but also for the role of situated practice in shaping teachers’ appropriation of concepts such as DA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and eacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Brown, A., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2006). TESOL at forty: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 9–34.
Cárdenas, M. L. (2006). Bilingual Colombia: Are we ready for it? What is needed? Paper presented at the 19th annual English Australia education conference, Perth, Australia.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colombia Bilingüe. (2016a). Pedagogical principles and guidelines: Suggested English curriculum. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Colombia Bilingüe. (2016b). Suggested curriculum structure. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 303–322.
Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: A critical examination of constructs and practices. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 813–829.
Davin, K. J., & Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 5–22.
Davin, K. J., Herazo, J. D., & Sagre, A. M. (2017). Learning to mediate: Teacher appropriation of dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 632–651.
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum and the school and society. Chicago: Phoenix Books.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Guk, I., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 281–299.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. New York: Routledge.
Herazo, J. D., Davin, K. J., & Sagre, A. M. (2019). Corrective feedback and dynamic assessment: Comparisons from an activity theory perspective. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 443–458.
Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235–257.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2016). Mindful l2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. New York: Routledge.
Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediaton. American Psychologist, 53, 27–36.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). New York: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–72.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011a). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011b). Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom: A teacher’s guide (2nd ed.). University Park: CALPER.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.
MEN. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry & B. A. Lafford (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 79–102). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Nir, A. E., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 377–386.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2015). Mediated development: Inter-psychological activity for L2 education. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2), 161–183.
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265.
Rassaei, E. (2014). Scaffolded feedback, recasts, and L2 development: A sociocultural perspective. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 417–431.
Sharkey, J. (2009). Can we praxize second language teacher education? An invitation to join a collective, collaborative challenge. Ïkala Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 14(22), 125–150.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., & Johnson, T. S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1399–1436.
Song, S., & Kellogg, D. (2011). Word meaning as a palimpsest: A defense of sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 589–604.
Toth, P. D. (2008, June). Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58, 237–283.
van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64(3), 549–578.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. New York: Longman.
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London/Oakville: Equinox.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (M. J. Hall (Ed.), Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davin, K.J., Herazo, J.D. (2020). Reconceptualizing Classroom Dynamic Assessment: Lessons from Teacher Practice. In: Poehner, M.E., Inbar-Lourie, O. (eds) Toward a Reconceptualization of Second Language Classroom Assessment. Educational Linguistics, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35081-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35081-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35080-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35081-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)