Skip to main content

Dynamic Reconfigurations in Frequency Constrained Data Flow

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2019)

Abstract

In Cyber-Physical Systems, the software components are often distributed over several computing nodes, connected by a communication network. Depending on several factors, the behavior of these components may dynamically change during its execution. The existing data flow formalisms for the performance prediction of dynamic systems do not cover the real-time constraints of these systems, and suffer from complexity issues in the verification of mandatory model properties. To overcome these limitations, we propose a dynamic extension to Polygraph, a static data flow formalism covering the real-time behavior of the CPS components. We also propose a verification algorithm to determine if the transitions between different modes are well-defined for a given model. Initial experiments show that this algorithm can be efficiently applied in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In other words, \({A}^*\) is the free monoid on A, and \({A}^+\) is the free semigroup on A.

  2. 2.

    \(\Uptheta \) corresponds to \(\omega \) and \(\varphi \) in [5, Def. 4], while initial marking \(\mathbf {m}\) is not integrated into the polygraph definition in this paper.

  3. 3.

    \(\theta \) corresponds to \(\tau \) and \(\mathbf {a}\) in [5, Def. 5].

  4. 4.

    We see here the reason for that condition in Definition 1: if both \(\gamma _{ij},\gamma _{ik}\notin \mathbb {Z}\), this and the following results do not hold, and the order of transitions can be important.

  5. 5.

    For the case of self-loops, excluded in the proposition, a similar result can be proved by separately considering matrices \(\mathbf {\Gamma }^+,\mathbf {\Gamma }^-\) with production and consumption rates.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, B., Bhattacharyya, S.S.: Parameterized dataflow modeling for DSP systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(10), 2408–2421 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilsen, G., Engels, M., Lauwereins, R., Peperstraete, J.A.: Cyclo-static data flow. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, vol. 5, pp. 3255–3258 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buck, J.T.: Static scheduling and code gen. from dynamic dataflow graphs with integer-valued control streams. In: Proceedings of ACSSC, vol. 1, pp. 508–513 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubrulle, P., Gaston, C., Kosmatov, N., Lapitre, A., Louise, S.: Polygraph: a data flow model with frequency arithmetic (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubrulle, P., Gaston, C., Kosmatov, N., Lapitre, A., Louise, S.: A data flow model with frequency arithmetic. In: Hähnle, R., van der Aalst, W. (eds.) FASE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11424, pp. 369–385. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16722-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Geilen, M., Falk, J., Haubelt, C., Basten, T., Theelen, B., Stuijk, S.: Performance analysis of weakly-consistent scenario-aware dataflow graphs. J. Signal Process. Syst. 87(1), 157–175 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geilen, M., Stuijk, S.: Worst-case performance analysis of synchronous dataflow scenarios. In: Proceedings of CODES+ISSS, pp. 125–134. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kahn, G., MacQueen, D., Laboria, I.: Coroutines and Networks of Parallel Processes. IRIA Research Report, IRIA Laboria (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, E.A., Messerschmitt, D.G.: Static scheduling of SDF programs for digital signal processing. IEEE Trans. Comput. C–36(1), 24–35 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh, H., Ha, S.: Fractional rate dataflow model for efficient code synthesis. J. VLSI Signal Process. Syst. Signal Image Video Technol. 37(1), 41–51 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plishker, W., Sane, N., Kiemb, M., Anand, K., Bhattacharyya, S.S.: Functional DIF for rapid prototyping. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on RSP, pp. 17–23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. The List Institute, CEA Tech: The DIVERSITY tool. http://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-formal-modeling-project/

  13. Theelen, B.D., et al.: Scenario-aware dataflow. Technical Reports, ESR-2008-08, TUE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Theelen, B.D., Geilen, M.C., Basten, T., Voeten, J.P., Gheorghita, S.V., Stuijk, S.: A scenario-aware data flow model for combined long-run average and worst-case performance analysis. In: Proceedings of MEMOCODE, pp. 185–194. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiggers, M.H., Bekooij, M.J., Smit, G.J.: Buffer capacity computation for throughput constrained streaming applications with data-dependent inter-task communication. In: Proceedings of RTAS, pp. 183–194. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Part of this work has been realized in the FACE/OPTEEM projects, involving CEA List and Renault. The Polygraph formalism has been used as a theoretical foundation for the software methodology in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Dubrulle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dubrulle, P., Gaston, C., Kosmatov, N., Lapitre, A. (2019). Dynamic Reconfigurations in Frequency Constrained Data Flow. In: Ahrendt, W., Tapia Tarifa, S. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11918. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34968-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34968-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34967-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34968-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics