Skip to main content

Abstract

An efficient investment portfolio would have maximum return or minimum risk. Several approaches based on the “expected returns - variance of returns” rule seek for a good balance between yield and risk. These approaches may differ in either how to measure risk or how to estimate expected yields. In this work we consider linear programming models found in the literature to estimate risks, like mean absolute deviation and Gini’s mean difference. Thus, two mixed integer programming models are investigated in a portfolio optimization problem for a given expected return. For such, we add real features, including transaction lots, cardinality, and investment threshold. Experiments using data from the Dow Jones stock market demonstrate the superiority of the investigated models in the presence of these real features when compared with a market average indicator of return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baumann, P., Trautmann, N.: Portfolio-optimization models for small investors. Math. Meth. Oper. Res. 77(3), 345–356 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruni, R., Cesarone, F., Scozzari, A., Tardella, F.: Real-world datasets for portfolio selection and solutions of some stochastic dominance portfolio models. Data Brief 8, 858–862 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Y., Sun, X., Li, J.: Pension fund asset allocation: a mean-variance model with CVaR constraints. Proc. Comput. Sci. 108, 1302–1307 (2017). International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2017, 12–14 June 2017, Zurich, Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolm, P.N., Tütüncü, R., Fabozzi, F.J.: 60 years of portfolio optimization: practical challenges and current trends. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(2), 356–371 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Konno, H., Yamazaki, H.: Mean absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Manag. Sci. 37, 519–529 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., Speranza, M.G.: Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 152(1), 227–256 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., Speranza, M.G.: Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(2), 518–535 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., Speranza, M.: Linear and Mixed Integer Programming for Portfolio Optimization. EURO Advanced Tutorials on Operational Research. Springer, Switzerland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3), 21–41 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodside-Oriakhi, M., Lucas, C., Beasley, J.: Portfolio rebalancing with an investment horizon and transaction costs. Omega 41(2), 406–420 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yitzhaki, S.: Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and Gini’s mean difference. Am. Econ. Rev. 72(1), 178–185 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Young, M.R.: A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution. Manag. Sci. 44(5), 673–683 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, Y.: A preliminary exploration on stochastic dynamic asset allocation models under a continuous-time sticky-price general equilibrium. Appl. Econ. 51(4), 373–386 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CNPq (grant 308312/2016-3), CAPES, FAPEG, FAPESP (2013/07375-0) and Intel for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leandro Resende Mundim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Queiroz, T.A., Mundim, L.R., de Carvalho, A.C.P.d.L.F. (2019). Linear Models for Portfolio Selection with Real Features. In: Paolucci, M., Sciomachen, A., Uberti, P. (eds) Advances in Optimization and Decision Science for Society, Services and Enterprises. AIRO Springer Series, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34960-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics