Abstract
This case study explores 3- and 4-year olds who do not master the use of the cardinal principle for exact enumeration (i.e. subset-knowers) in cross-domain mapping of numerosity in an outdoors navigation task from a perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Based on shared experiences in an intervention involving articulated physical tagging of 1- to 4-dotted arrays (e.g. articulate “kangaroo-two” while using the feet to tag the two elements in a 2-dotted array), the participants engaged individually in a novel task with free use of number metaphors for body-spatial mapping of numerosity and navigation across a circle with 50 dots. The child’s and the experimenter’s actions and non-verbal and verbal utterances were recorded on video. From an interpretive stance, the pattern and cross-case analysis show both a shared ability to use number metaphors (i.e. “cock-a-doodle-doo-one”, “kangaroo-two”, “monkey-three” and “frog-four”) for physical and verbal communication of additive structures that exceed their cardinal knower level, as well as quality differences in navigation and cross-domain mapping of quantities within and across knower levels. We argue that the use of a spatial structured language might cultivate subset-knowers’ subitising-based enumeration skills in a manner that integrates navigation and authentic movement patterns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bjørnebye, M., Sigurjonsson, T., & Solbakken, T. (2017). Perception, cognition and measurement of verbal and non-verbal aspects of the cardinal concept in bodily-spatial interaction. In T. Dooley & G. Gueuder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10) (pp. 1829–1836). Dublin, Ireland: European Society for Resarch in Mathematics Eduction.
Clements, D. H. (1999). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 400–405.
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314.
Feigenson, L., Libertus, M. E., & Halberda, J. (2013). Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12019
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.
Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J., & Goodway, J. (2012). Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gallistel, C. R. (2011). Mental magnitudes. In S. Dehane & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 3–12). New York: Elsevier.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
Gibbs, R. W. (2009). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 14–36.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gimbert, F., Gentaz, E., Camos, V., & Mazens, K. (2016). Children’s approximate number system in haptic modality. Perception, 45(1–2), 44–55.
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 498–525.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 202–251.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105(2), 395–438.
Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002
Lee, M. D., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2010). A model of knower-level behavior in number concept development. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 51–67.
Levine, S. C., Suriyakham, L. W., Rowe, M. L., Huttenlocher, J., & Gunderson, E. A. (2010). What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge? Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1309.
Mix, K. S., Sandhofer, C. M., Moore, J. A., & Russell, C. (2012). Acquisition of the cardinal word principle: The role of input. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.10.003
Piazza, M. (2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 542–551.
Piazza, M., Fumarola, A., Chinello, A., & Melcher, D. (2011). Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity. Cognition, 121(1), 147–153.
Riggs, K. J., Ferrand, L., Lancelin, D., Fryziel, L., Dumur, G., & Simpson, A. (2006). Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychological Science, 17(4), 271–272.
Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 357–379.
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89–96.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2012). Cognitive conflict and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 585–587). Boston: Springer US.
Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36(2), 155–193.
Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 220–251.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bjørnebye, M., Sigurjonsson, T. (2020). Young Children’s Cross-Domain Mapping of Numerosity in Path Navigation. In: Carlsen, M., Erfjord, I., Hundeland, P.S. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34775-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34776-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)