Skip to main content

Young Children’s Cross-Domain Mapping of Numerosity in Path Navigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematics Education in the Early Years

Abstract

This case study explores 3- and 4-year olds who do not master the use of the cardinal principle for exact enumeration (i.e. subset-knowers) in cross-domain mapping of numerosity in an outdoors navigation task from a perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Based on shared experiences in an intervention involving articulated physical tagging of 1- to 4-dotted arrays (e.g. articulate “kangaroo-two” while using the feet to tag the two elements in a 2-dotted array), the participants engaged individually in a novel task with free use of number metaphors for body-spatial mapping of numerosity and navigation across a circle with 50 dots. The child’s and the experimenter’s actions and non-verbal and verbal utterances were recorded on video. From an interpretive stance, the pattern and cross-case analysis show both a shared ability to use number metaphors (i.e. “cock-a-doodle-doo-one”, “kangaroo-two”, “monkey-three” and “frog-four”) for physical and verbal communication of additive structures that exceed their cardinal knower level, as well as quality differences in navigation and cross-domain mapping of quantities within and across knower levels. We argue that the use of a spatial structured language might cultivate subset-knowers’ subitising-based enumeration skills in a manner that integrates navigation and authentic movement patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bjørnebye, M., Sigurjonsson, T., & Solbakken, T. (2017). Perception, cognition and measurement of verbal and non-verbal aspects of the cardinal concept in bodily-spatial interaction. In T. Dooley & G. Gueuder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10) (pp. 1829–1836). Dublin, Ireland: European Society for Resarch in Mathematics Eduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (1999). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 400–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Libertus, M. E., & Halberda, J. (2013). Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J., & Goodway, J. (2012). Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. R. (2011). Mental magnitudes. In S. Dehane & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 3–12). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2009). Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbert, F., Gentaz, E., Camos, V., & Mazens, K. (2016). Children’s approximate number system in haptic modality. Perception, 45(1–2), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 498–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 202–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105(2), 395–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. D., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2010). A model of knower-level behavior in number concept development. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Suriyakham, L. W., Rowe, M. L., Huttenlocher, J., & Gunderson, E. A. (2010). What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge? Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mix, K. S., Sandhofer, C. M., Moore, J. A., & Russell, C. (2012). Acquisition of the cardinal word principle: The role of input. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, M. (2010). Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 542–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, M., Fumarola, A., Chinello, A., & Melcher, D. (2011). Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity. Cognition, 121(1), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, K. J., Ferrand, L., Lancelin, D., Fryziel, L., Dumur, G., & Simpson, A. (2006). Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychological Science, 17(4), 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2012). Cognitive conflict and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 585–587). Boston: Springer US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36(2), 155–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 220–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morten Bjørnebye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bjørnebye, M., Sigurjonsson, T. (2020). Young Children’s Cross-Domain Mapping of Numerosity in Path Navigation. In: Carlsen, M., Erfjord, I., Hundeland, P.S. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34775-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34776-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics