Skip to main content

Teaching About Disability Discourse in the College Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Research in Multilingual Settings

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

  • 171 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates methods for teaching effectively about linguistics research in an undergraduate classroom and for further disseminating my work on disability discourse. The motivational relevance (Candlin and Sarangi, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–8, 2004) for participants with physical disabilities to take part in my research is their desire to raise awareness of their experiences among people without disabilities (Cochrane, Telling disability: Identity construction in personal and vicarious narratives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 2014). To evaluate how my teaching achieves this goal, I administered a questionnaire to (majority non-disabled) students before and after teaching the lesson plan. Key questions included how students defined the term “disability” and what new information they learned. The words most commonly used to define disability shifted from “ability/able”, “perform”, and “normal/normally” before the lesson to “people with disabilities”, “community”, and “individual” afterward. Almost half of the responses mentioned a specific aspect of disability discourse. The overall findings point toward bringing in more narratives from the disability community to connect to students’ own experiences through affective learning (Shephard, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98, 2008). Evaluating a single lesson plan to understand what students thought beforehand and took away afterward has been illuminating in ways that general course evaluations are not. My findings suggest ways in which we can better share our linguistics research with undergraduates in the classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am grateful to my research assistants, Jessica Campbell and Abraham Kruger, for their help with collecting and coding the data for this chapter.

  2. 2.

    The terms regarding disability used in this chapter are currently widespread in academic writing; however, terminology often changes or becomes controversial. For example, some prefer to highlight group membership with “disabled people” versus “people with disabilities”. I have tried to use terms that are considered acceptable at present by people with disabilities, though there is no term agreed on by all.

  3. 3.

    Although many advocacy groups make the point that it is not the responsibility of individuals in marginalized groups to educate others about their experiences, the participants in my study all expressed their willingness to do so as an alternative to allowing others to be ignorant of their experiences.

  4. 4.

    The quotation marks (scare quotes) appear to indicate that the participant meant resources that are considered standard by society generally rather than resources that are objectively standard in some way.

  5. 5.

    To the question, “Do you consider yourself to be a person with a physical disability”, only one participant chose the given option “No, because I would use another term for myself” rather than “Yes”. This participant responded that they use the term “chronically ill” and find the term “disabled” (which was not used in this questionnaire) to be offensive.

  6. 6.

    The participant who acquired their disability later in life also responded that their age is 35–45 years; all the other participants were between 18 and 35 years of age.

References

  • Al Zidjaly, N. (2015). Disability, discourse and technology: Agency and inclusion in (inter)action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. L., Seelman, K. D., & Bury, M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, B. M. (2001). Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 97–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(104), 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, M. (2004). Form and functions of “slut bashing” in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development, 47, 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S. (2004). Making applied linguistics matter. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, L. (2011). Identity construction among bloggers who use wheelchairs. Paper given at the Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, L. (2014). Telling disability: Identity construction in personal and vicarious narratives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, L. (2015). Positioning selves with physical disabilities in narrative. In L. Grujicic-Alatriste (Ed.), Linking discourse studies to professional practice. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2017). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grue, J. (2016). The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique. Disability & Society, 31(6), 838–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grujicic-Alatriste, L. (2015). Framework for application of research findings: An introduction. In L. Grujicic-Alatriste (Ed.), Linking discourse studies to professional practice. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grujicic-Alatriste, L. (this volume). Knowledge translation at the sites of practice: From outreach and dissemination to reflexive evaluation (Chapter 1). In Lubie Grujicic-Alatriste (Ed.), Language research in multilingual settings: Doing research knowledge dissemination at the sites of practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, B., & Preston, J. (2017). Confirming normalcy: ‘Inspiration porn’ and the construction of the disabled subject? In K. Ellis & M. Kent (Eds.), Disability and social media: Global perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, 11, 165–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masala, C., & Petretto, D. R. (2013). Models of disability. In J. H. Stone & M. Blouin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, L. (1987). Language and social networks. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1990). Strategic uses of narrative in the presentation of self and illness: A research note. Social Science and Medicine, 30(11), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, N. (2013). Sociolinguistic fieldwork. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity, and difference. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide (pp. 94–113). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 197–203). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2014, April). I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much. TEDxSydney. Lecture. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie E. Cochrane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Blog Entry Analyzed by Students During the Lesson Plan

Blog data excerpted from Cochrane (2011)

Picture this.

The bus pulls up. The driver looks at your power chair and says “Oh, I never operated the lift before” and then proceeds to prove that point by having to move the bus several times so the lift will go down properly. The driver then radios in that the bus will be late because there is a passenger in a wheelchair.

[…]

You get on the lift. The driver raises it and tells you to hold on to the sides. You can’t hold on, because you have quadriplegia and your arms are paralyzed, but you know she doesn’t know what that is, so you just move your upper body a bit which, luckily, satisfies her.

[…]

You do not think “Oh I wish I wasn’t paralyzed.” You think “I wish someone had trained this driver properly. What good is the equipment if there’s no training?”

[…]

The bus takes off after an approximate delay of twelve to fifteen minutes, more than triple the time it took on the first ride. As one passenger disembarks, he says to you “Hope you’re never taking the same bus I take ever again.”

You know you will. Because you have to get around, just like him.

Appendix 2: Questionnaires

Questionnaire about a Class on Disability Discourse

Dr. Leslie Cochrane

The College of William and Mary

The aim of this survey is to evaluate the impact of a class lecture and discussion in one of Dr. Cochrane’s courses for college students’ understandings of physical disability.

Your participation in answering the following questions is entirely voluntary. You may withdraw at any time without penalty. Your name or other individually identifying information will not be associated with your answers to this survey. There are no foreseeable risks of this study, and there are no benefits aside from helping with the development of the class. None of your grades in any class will be affected by participating, not participating, or withdrawing your participation.

If you have questions about this survey, please contact Dr. Cochrane at lecochrane@wm.edu. If you have concerns about your rights as a participant in the study or want to report dissatisfactions with any aspect of it, please contact Dr. Jennifer Stevens, Chair of the College of William and Mary’s Protection of Human Subjects Committee, at jastev@wm.edu.

  1. 1.

    Do you voluntarily agree to take this survey?

    • Yes

    • No

  2. 2.

    Are you 18 years of age or older?

    • Yes

    • No

  • (An answer of ‘No’ to either question 1 or 2 terminates the survey.)

  1. 3.

    Do you consider yourself to be a person with a physical disability?

    • Yes

    • No

    • No, because I would use another term for myself (please provide the term) ____________

    • Prefer not to say

  • (If the answer to 3 is ‘Yes’ or ‘No, because I would use another term’, questions 4–6 are used:)

  1. 4.

    From what point in your life have you had a physical disability?

    • Since birth or early childhood (about 0–5 year)

    • Since childhood or adolescence (about 6–17 years)

    • Since early adulthood (about 18–24 years of age)

    • Later in life (after 25 years of age)

    • Prefer not to say

  2. 5.

    Is your physical disability related to mobility?

    • Yes

    • No

    • Prefer not to say

  3. 6.

    Is your physical disability visible: can other people perceive it from the way you appear or move or from an assistive device you use?

    • Yes

    • No

    • Prefer not to say

  • (For all answers to 3, the following questions are used:)

  1. 7.

    Are you close to anyone (else) with a physical disability? (check all that apply)

    • Family member(s)

    • Friend(s)

    • Person/people I have lived with

    • Person/people I have acted as an assistant to

    • Other person/people I know well

    • Not anyone I am close to or know well

    • Not anyone I can recall

  2. 8.

    Have you ever studied physical disability from an academic perspective? (check all that apply)

    • Yes, within a course in which the major topic was disability

    • Yes, within a course on another major topic

    • Yes, in a less formal setting (for example, reading a book on disability)

    • No

  3. 9.

    Have you participated in the class lecture and discussion on disability discourse in Dr. Cochrane’s course?

    • Not yet

    • Yes

  • (If the answer to 9 is ‘Not yet’, questions 10–11 are used with free response spaces:)

  1. 10.

    How would you define disability?

  2. 11.

    What (if anything) would you be interested in studying about disability and language?

  • (If the answer to 9 is ‘Yes’, questions 12–15 are used, 12–13 with free response spaces:)

  1. 12.

    What (if any) new, surprising, or shareable information did you learn in the lecture and discussion?

  2. 13.

    What else (if anything) would you be interested in studying about disability and language?

  3. 14.

    How long ago did you participate in Dr. Cochrane’s course?

    • This current semester (or this summer)

    • Last semester

    • About a year ago (this semester last year)

    • More than a year ago

  4. 15.

    Did you complete a questionnaire before the class lecture and discussion?

    • Yes

    • No

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cochrane, L.E. (2020). Teaching About Disability Discourse in the College Classroom. In: Grujicic-Alatriste, L. (eds) Language Research in Multilingual Settings. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34671-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34671-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34670-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34671-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics