Advertisement

Exploring the Effect of Game Premise in Cooperative Digital Board Games

  • Supara GrudpanEmail author
  • Dmitry Alexandrovky
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
  • Rainer Malaka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11863)

Abstract

The design of cooperative games is challenging due to the requirements of cooperation between the players. The major need of the design is to provide an environment that enables players to achieve the game goal in a cooperative fashion. The game premise which is the story behind the game is one of the dramatic elements and impacts the engagement of players. In this paper, we investigate the effect of game premise on the engagement of the players and the cooperation between the players. Hence, to understand this effect, we developed three versions of the Pandemic game with three premises namely positive, negative, and neutral. Using these game versions, we conducted an experiment to see how game premise affects the player experience. The results show that premise can significantly influence the players’ intrinsic motivation, the connection with the game and the cooperation strategies.

Keywords

Cooperative games Game premise Player experience Players’ cooperation 

References

  1. 1.
    The effects of adding premise and backstory to psychological tasks. Tech. repGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergstrom, K., McArthur, V., Jenson, J., Peyton, T.: All in a day’s work: a study of world of warcraft npcs comparing gender to professions. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, pp. 31–35. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J.: Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beznosyk, A., Quax, P., Coninx, K., Lamotte, W.: The influence of cooperative game design patterns for remote play on player experience. In: Proceedings of the 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction, APCHI 2012, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birk, M.V., Atkins, C., Bowey, J.T., Mandryk, R.L.: Fostering intrinsic motivation through avatar identification in digital games. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, pp. 2982–2995. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clemson, H., Coulton, P., Edwards, R.: A serendipitous mobile game. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference in Computer Game Design and Technology (GDTW 2006), pp. 130–134 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emmerich, K., Masuch, M.: The impact of game patterns on player experience and social interaction in co-located multiplayer games. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY 2017, pp. 411–422. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fullerton, T.: Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. AK Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fullerton, T.: Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. AK Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holmes, J.R., et al.: A good scare: leveraging game theming and narrative to impact player experience. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. LBW0178. ACM (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Electronic Arts Inc.: SimCity. Online (1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iten, G.H., Steinemann, S.T., Opwis, K.: Choosing to help monsters: a mixed-method examination of meaningful choices in narrative-rich games and interactive narratives. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 341. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Clark, M., Watling, C.: Cooperative game play with avatars and agents: differences in brain activity and the experience of play. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kivikangas, J.M., Kätsyri, J., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N.: Gender differences in emotional responses to cooperative and competitive game play. PloS one 9(7), e100318 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krause, M., Takhtamysheva, A., Wittstock, M., Malaka, R.: Frontiers of a paradigm: exploring human computation with digital games. In: Proceedings of the Acm Sigkdd Workshop on Human Computation, pp. 22–25. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liebrand, W.B., Jansen, R.W., Rijken, V.M., Suhre, C.J.: Might over morality: social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22(3), 203–215 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90024-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Malaka, R.: How computer games can improve your health and fitness. In: Göbel, S., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) GameDays 2014. LNCS, vol. 8395, pp. 1–7. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05972-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayring, P.: The qualitative content analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS) 1(2, Art. 20) (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller, M.K., Summers, A.: Gender differences in video game characters’ roles, appearances, and attire as portrayed in video game magazines. Sex roles 57(9–10), 733–742 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rauch, P.E.: Playing with good and evil: videogames and moral philosophy (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rigby, S., Ryan, R.: The player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) model. Immersyve Inc., pp. 1–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4), 344–360 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sedano, C.I., Carvalho, M.B., Secco, N., Longstreet, C.S.: Collaborative and cooperative games: Facts and assumptions. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, CTS 2013 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2013.6567257
  24. 24.
    Triandis, H.C.: The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol. Rev. 96(3), 506 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weaver, A.J., Lewis, N.: Mirrored morality: an exploration of moral choice in video games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(11), 610–614 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wendel, V., Göbel, S., Steinmetz, R.: Collaborative learning in multiplayer serious games. Clash Realities Proc. 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wendel, V., Gutjahr, M., Göbel, S., Steinmetz, R.: Designing collaborative multiplayer serious games: escape from wilson island-a multiplayer 3d serious game for collaborative learning in teams. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9244-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leacock, M.: Pandemic. Z-Man Games, Board game (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zagal, J.P., Rick, J., Hsi, I.: Collaborative games: lessons learned from board games. Simul. Gaming (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supara Grudpan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dmitry Alexandrovky
    • 1
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rainer Malaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Media Lab, TZIUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.BIBA-Bremen Institute for Production and Logistics GmbhBremenGermany
  3. 3.KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenSödertäljeSweden

Personalised recommendations