Pathways to Sustainable Agricultural Development

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy book series (AEFP)


In this chapter, we describe the design and implementation of more sustainable development pathways based on two components. Participatory processes choose indicators and set goals; and science-based tools evaluate system performance along the envisioned pathways. Implementation processes design technologies and policies that incentivize changes in the behavior of consumers and producers. The complexity of agricultural systems means there is no one-size-fits-all solutions to sustainable agricultural development. The political and governance challenges of implementation remain daunting. Yet, we are cautiously optimistic since the tools to design and implement more sustainable agricultural development pathways for both developing and industrialized countries are advancing rapidly and becoming widely available, creating opportunities for progress as citizens, businesses, and governments throughout the world recognize the imperative of sustainable development.


  1. Antle, J.M. 1999. The New Economics of Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 (5): 993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antle, J.M., S. Cho, H. Tabatabaie, and R. Valdivia. 2018. Economic and Environmental Performance of Dryland Wheat Systems in a 1.5 Degree C World. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 24: 165–180. Scholar
  3. Antle, J., J. Jones, and C. Rosenzweig. 2017. Next Generation Agricultural System Data, Models and Knowledge Products: Synthesis and Strategy. Agricultural Systems 155: 179–185.Google Scholar
  4. Antle, J.M., and C.O. Stöckle. 2017. Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Insights from Agronomic-Economic Analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11 (2): 299–318. Scholar
  5. EAT-Lancet Commission. 2019. Summary Report of the EAT-Lancet Commission.
  6. FABLE. 2019. Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems. 2019 Report of the FABLE Consortium. Laxenburg and Paris: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).Google Scholar
  7. Hayami, Y., and V.W. Ruttan. 1971. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective (2nd ed., 1985). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heady, E.O. 1961. Agricultural Production Functions. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Johansson, Robert, Mark Peters, and Robert House. 2007. Regional Environment and Agriculture Programming Model. TB-1916. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, J.W., J.M. Antle, B.O. Basso, K. Boote, R.T. Conant, I. Foster, H.C.J. Godfray, M. Herrero, R.E. Howitt, S. Janssen, B.A. Keating, R. Munoz-Carpena, C. Porter, C.E. Rosenzweig, and T.R. Wheeler. 2017. Towards a New Generation of Agricultural System Models, Data, and Knowledge Products: State of Agricultural Systems Science. Agricultural Systems 155: 268–288.Google Scholar
  11. Nelson, G.C., H. Valin, R.D. Sands, P. Havlik, H. Ahammad, D. Deryng, J. Elliott, et al. 2013. Climate Change Effects on Agriculture: Economic Responses to Biophysical Shocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 3274–3279. Scholar
  12. Rosenzweig, C., J. Antle, and J. Elliott. 2016. Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Food Security Worldwide. Eos 97. Published on 9 March 2016.
  13. Rosenzweig, C., J.W. Jones, J.L. Hatfield, A.C. Ruane, K.J. Boote, P. Thorburn, J.M. Antle, et al. 2013. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and Pilot Studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170: 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosenzweig, C., A.C. Ruane, J.M. Antle, et al. 2018. Coordinating AgMIP Data and Models Across Global and Regional Scales for 1.5° and 2.0° C Assessments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 376: 20160455. Scholar
  15. Schomers, Sarah, and Bettina Matzdorf. 2013. Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Review and Comparison of Developing and Industrialized Countries. Ecosystem Services 6: 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Valdivia, R.O., J.M. Antle, C. Rosenzweig, A.C. Ruane, J. Vervoort, M. Ashfaq, I. Hathie, S. Homann-Kee Tui, R. Mulwa, C. Nhemachena, P. Ponnusamy, H. Rasnayaka, and H. Singh. 2015. Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios for Regional Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impact, Vulnerability and Adaptation. In Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments, Part 1, ed. C. Rosenzweig and D. Hillel. London: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Valdivia, R.O., J.M. Antle, and J.J. Stoorvogel. 2017. Designing and Evaluating Sustainable Development Pathways for Semi-Subsistence Crop-Livestock Systems: Lessons from Kenya. Agricultural Economics 48 (S1): 11–26. Scholar
  18. van Ittersum, Martin K., Frank Ewert, Thomas Heckelei, Jacques Wery, Johanna Alkan Olsson, Erling Andersen, Irina Bezlepkina, Floor Brouwer, Marcello Donatelli, Guillermo Flichman, Lennart Olsson, Andrea E. Rizzoli, Tamme van der Wal, Jan Erik Wien, and Joost Wolf. 2008. Integrated Assessment of Agricultural Systems—A Component-based Framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agricultural Systems 96 (1–3): 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Wijk, M., M. Rufino, D. Enahoro, D. Parsons, S. Silvestri, R. Valdivia, and M. Herrero. 2014. Farm Household Models to Analyse Food Security in a Changing Climate: A Review. Global Food Security 3: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. World Bank. 2019. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations