Challenges of Sustainable Agricultural Development in High-Income Countries

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy book series (AEFP)


The challenges of sustainable development in industrial countries are quite distinct from those of the developing regions. In these countries, the majority of food is produced on large commercial farms. Farm household incomes are relatively high and often equal or exceed incomes in the non-agricultural sectors for comparable skills and experience. A major economic issue is the financial viability of smaller farms and the ongoing consolidation of land into larger farms. Environmental concerns dominate the sustainability challenges of these systems, due to their reliance on chemical inputs and biotechnology, impacts on water quality and quantity, use of hormones and antibiotics in livestock production, and greenhouse gas emissions. Health and safety of farm workers, rural community viability, and animal welfare are important social challenges.


  1. Basso, Bruno, and John Antle. 2020. Digital Agronomy to Design and Scale Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Nature Sustainability. In press.Google Scholar
  2. Bechdol, Elizabeth, Allen Gray, and Brent Gloy. 2010. Forces Affecting Change in Crop Production Agriculture. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues 25: 11–16.Google Scholar
  3. Beckman, Jayson, John Dyck, and Kari E.R. Heerman. 2017. The Global Landscape of Agricultural Trade, 1995–2014. EIB-181. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  4. Bokusheva, R., and S. Kimura. 2016. Cross-Country Comparison of Farm Size Distribution. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 94. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  5. Economic Research Service, USDA. 2019a. Brazil Once Again Becomes the World’s Larges Beef Exporter.
  6. ———. 2019b. Share of Chinese Soybean Imports Supplied by Brazil has Increased; U.S. Share has Decreased.
  7. European Commission. 2018. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources based on Member State Reports for the Period 2012–2015.
  8. Eurostat. 2019. Statistics Explained: Agri-environmental Indicators—Nitrate Pollution of Water.
  9. FABLE. 2019. Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems. 2019 Report of the FABLE Consortium. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), Laxenburg and Paris.Google Scholar
  10. FAO and OECD. 2019. Background Notes on Sustainable, Productive and Resilient Agro-Food Systems: Value Chains, Human Capital, and the 2030 Agenda. Rome.
  11. Freedman, D. 2013. The Truth about Genetically Modified Food. Scientific American, September 1.
  12. HLPE. 2016. Sustainable Agricultural Development for Food Security and Nutrition: What Roles for Livestock? A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome.Google Scholar
  13. ISAAA. 2018. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2018: Biotech Crops Continue to Help Meet the Challenges of Increased Population and Climate Change. ISAAA Brief No. 54. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  14. James, Clive. 2013. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Jezequel, M. 2019. Global Appetite for Beef, Soy Fuels Amazon Fires.
  16. Johnson, Kenneth M., and Daniel T. Lichter. 2019. Rural Depopulation: Growth and Decline Processes over the Past Century. Rural Sociology 84 (1): 3–27. Scholar
  17. Lauer, M., J.K. Hansen, P. Lamers, and D. Thrän. 2018. Making Money from Waste: The Economic Viability of Producing Biogas and Biomethane in the Idaho Dairy Industry. Applied Energy 222: 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald, James M., Penni Korb, and Robert A. Hoppe. 2013. Farm Size and the Organization of U.S. Crop Farming. ERR-152. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  19. MacDonald, James M., and William D. McBride. 2009. The Transformation of U.S. Livestock Agriculture: Scale, Efficiency and Risks. EIB-43. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, January.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. 2013. OECD Compendium of Agri-environmental Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scholar
  21. Porter, J.R., L. Xie, A.J. Challinor, K. Cochrane, S.M. Howden, M.M. Iqbal, D.B. Lobell, and M.I. Travasso. 2014. Food Security and Food Production Systems. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C.B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White, 485–533. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Salin, Delmy. 2018. Soybean Transportation Guide: Brazil 2017. U.S.421 Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service.
  23. Sullivan, P., D. Hellerstein, L. Hansen, R. Johansson, S. Koenig, R. Lubowski, W. McBride, et al. 2004. The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America. ERS, Agricultural Economic Report 834, October. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Thematic Group on Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2013. Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems.
  25. World Health Organization. 2014. Frequently Asked Questions on Genetically Modified Foods.
  26. World Resources Institute. 2019. Interactive Map of Eutrophication and Hypoxia.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations