Economic Development, Sustainable Development, and Agriculture

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy book series (AEFP)


We begin this chapter with the conventional view of economic growth as the driver of economic and social development, and the central role that agriculture plays in the growth process. Increasing human dominance of global ecosystems and subsequent environmental social challenges motivate the concept of sustainable development. We discuss sustainable development as both a conceptual framework for understanding economic, environmental, and social changes and a normative framework for setting goals. We describe the three principal dimensions of sustainable development—economic, environmental, and social—and the important role that agriculture plays in each. Finally, we introduce the concept of Tradeoff Analysis as a way to combine the positive and normative approaches.


  1. Agarwal, Bina. 1985. Work Participation of Rural Women in Third World: Some Data and Conceptual Biases. Economic and Political Weekly 20: A155–A164.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2003. Gender and Land Rights Revisited: Exploring New Prospects Via the State, Family and Market. Journal of Agrarian Change 3 (1–2): 184–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, Robert U., and Allen V. Kneese. 1969. Production, Consumption, and Externalities. The American Economic Review 59 (3): 282–297.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S. 1992. Nobel Price Lecture. Nobel Media AB 2019.
  5. Brunson, Emily K., Bettina Shell-Duncan, and Matthew Steele. 2009. Women’s Autonomy and Its Relationship to Children’s Nutrition Among the Rendille of Northern Kenya. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council 21 (1): 55–64. Scholar
  6. Cunningham, Kenda, George B. Ploubidis, Purnima Menon, Marie Ruel, Suneetha Kadiyala, Ricardo Uauy, and Elaine Ferguson. 2015. Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture and Child Nutritional Status in Rural Nepal. Public Health Nutrition 18 (17): 3134–3145. Scholar
  7. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2019. University of Groningen and University of California, Davis, Capital Stock at Constant National Prices for China [RKNANPCNA666NRUG]. Accessed May 12, 2019, from FRED.
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2019.
  9. Global Carbon Budget. 2018. Earth System Science Data 10 (4): 2141–2194.Google Scholar
  10. Harari, Y.N. 2017. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  11. Heal, Geoffrey. 2016. Endangered Economies—How the Neglect of Nature Threatens Our Prosperity. Columbia University Press.
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  13. ———. 2018. Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Kuznets, Simon. 1971. Nobel Prize Lecture. Nobel Media AB 2019.
  15. Lewis, Simon L., and Mark A. Maslin. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519 (7542): 171–180. Scholar
  16. Maddison Project Database, Jutta Bolt, Robert Inklaar, Herman de Jong, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2018. Rebasing ‘Maddison’: New Income Comparisons and the Shape of Long-run Economic Development. Maddison Project Working paper 10.Google Scholar
  17. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Julia Behrman, Purnima Menon, and Agnes Quisumbing. 2012. Gender: A Key Dimension Linking Agricultural Programs to Improved Nutrition and Health. In Reshaping Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, 135–144. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Mellor, J.W. 2017. Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation: Promoting Growth with Poverty Reduction. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Quisumbing, Agnes, and John A. Maluccio. 2000. Intrahousehold Allocation and Gender Relations: New Empirical Evidence from Four Developing Countries. Washington, DC: IFPRI. Google Scholar
  20. Riley, James C. 2005. Estimates of Regional and Global Life Expectancy, 1800–2001. Issue Population and Development Review. Population and Development Review 31 (3): 537–543. [Zijdeman, Richard, and Filipa Ribeira da Silva. 2015. Life Expectancy at Birth (Total). IISH Dataverse, V1, and UN Population Division (2019).]
  21. Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York and Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Solow, Robert M. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94. Scholar
  24. Weitzman, Martin L. 2007. Income, Wealth, and the Maximum Principle. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. World Bank. 2007. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  26. ———. 2019a. World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Washington, DC. Accessed November 17, 2019.
  27. ———. 2019b. Human Capital Index vs. GDP per Capita. Our World in Data.
  28. World Food Summit. 1996. Rome Declaration on Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. FAO.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations