Advertisement

Engaging with Human Rights: truth and reconciliation and hang

Chapter
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

In a series of plays since 2005 debbie tucker green has dramatized human rights issues and global injustice. In this chapter Derbyshire and Hodson argue that these dramas go beyond raising awareness of injustice to present complex ethical questions stemming from the specific and subjective experience of those affected. Insisting on the significance of axes of power and discrimination, tucker green encourages spectators to reflect on the impact of factors such as race, gender and nationality both on the experiences of the characters and on their own responses to the drama. By such means, Derbyshire and Hodson argue, the plays work to awaken a reflective self-awareness which enables the adoption of new subject positions from which injustice can be addressed. They make this case with reference to truth and reconciliation (2011) and hang (2015), considering them in relation to the treatment of the archetypal human rights figures of the victim and the perpetrator.

References

  1. Aragay, Mireia and Enric Monforte (2013) ‘Racial Violence, Witnessing and Emancipated Spectatorship in The Colour of Justice, Fallout and random’, in Vicky Angelaki (ed) Contemporary British Theatre: Breaking New Ground (Basingstoke: Palgrave), pp. 96–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah (reissued 2006) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  3. Boycott, Owen (2014) ‘Extra Support for Victims of Crime Announced by Government’, Guardian [Online], 15 September, https://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/sep/15/support-victims-crime-government-chris-grayling-justice. Accessed 23 May 2018.
  4. Cryer, Robert (reissued 2011) Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Derbyshire, Harry and Loveday Hodson (2008) ‘Performing Injustice: Human Rights and Verbatim Theatre’, Law and Humanities 2: 191–211.Google Scholar
  6. Eberechi, Ifeonu (2011) ‘“Rounding Up the Usual Suspects”: Exclusion, Selectivity, and Impunity in the Enforcement of International Criminal Justice and the African Union’s Emerging Resistance’, African Journal of Legal Studies 4: 51–84.Google Scholar
  7. Fragkou, Marissia and Lynette Goddard (2013) ‘Acting In/Action: Staging Human Rights in debbie tucker green’s Royal Court Plays’, in Vicky Angelaki (ed) Contemporary British Theatre: Breaking New Ground (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave), pp. 145–166.Google Scholar
  8. Goddard, Lynette (2015) Contemporary Black British Playwrights: Margins to Mainstream (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kapur, Ratna (2002) ‘The Tragedy of Victimization Rhetoric: Resurrecting the “Native” Subject in International/Post-Colonial Feminist Legal Politics’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 1–38.Google Scholar
  10. Mutua, Makau wa (2001) ‘Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights’, Harvard International Law Journal 42(1): 201–245.Google Scholar
  11. Pinter, Harold (reissued 1996) ‘One for the Road’, in Harold Pinter: Plays 4 (London: Faber).Google Scholar
  12. Ratner, Steven R., Jason Abrams, and James Bischoff (2009) Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. tucker green, debbie (2011) truth and reconciliation (London: Nick Hern).Google Scholar
  14. tucker green, debbie (2015) hang (London: Nick Hern).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GreenwichLondonUK
  2. 2.University of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations