Skip to main content

The Compensation Fund on the Postal Market: The Polish Case

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Postal Environment

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy ((TREP))

Abstract

In 2008, the EU adopted the third postal directive. This legislation introduced the legal basis for gradual market opening. It set a deadline of 31 December 2010 for full market opening for 16 member states and 31 December 2012 for the remaining 11 member states, mostly from the Central and Eastern European countries (Crew and Kleindorfer 2008, p. 3; Snażyk 2015, p. 13). The third postal directive also changed the method, in which the universal postal service could be provided and financed. Additionally, the directive required the EU Commission to provide assistance to member states on its implementation, including the calculation of any net cost of the universal service (Bailly and Meidinger 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PP is a joint-stock company solely owned by the state.

  2. 2.

    Act of 1 January 2013 Postal Law, consolidated text Journal of Laws of 2012, item 1529, as amended.

  3. 3.

    Source: UKE. (2018). Report on the state of the postal market in 2017.

  4. 4.

    Basically: Art. 36 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR) and Art. 14, the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU).

  5. 5.

    There are constitutional sources of universal service in Poland: Art. 20 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland (CRP), Art. 32 CRP (prohibition of discrimination), or Art. 69 CRP (special assistance for the disabled).

  6. 6.

    Deutsche Post DHL is a designated operator in terms of international postal regulations, i.e., for the Universal Postal Union.

  7. 7.

    Party may appeal against the President UKE administrative decision to the administrative courts [Administrative Voivodeship Court in Warsaw]. The judicial control exercised by the administrative courts against the decisions is performed on the basis of the legality (model of cassation).

  8. 8.

    The public tender for providing mail service for common courts in Poland in 2016–2018 was won by PP and 2019–2022.

  9. 9.

    Ordinance of the Minister of Administration and Digitization of 6 May 2013 on the methodology for setting maximum annual levels of fees for universal services, Journal of Laws of 2013, item 543.

  10. 10.

    Yearly price indices of consumer goods and services in Poland were 2013, 0,9%; 2014, 0%; 2015, −0,9%; 2016, −0,6%; 2017, 2,0%; and 2018, 1,6%. [https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/prices-trade/price-indices/price-indices-of-consumer-goods-and-services/yearly-price-indices-of-consumer-goods-and-services-from-1950/].

  11. 11.

    According to the Postal Law Act, registered item is a letter item which is a recorded item, transported and delivered in a manner that protects it against loss, partial loss of its contents, or damage.

  12. 12.

    According to the Postal Law Act, letter item is an item of correspondence or a printed form, excluding direct mail.

  13. 13.

    Source: The UKE Report on the state of the postal market in 2016

  14. 14.

    The segment of the services falling within the scope of universal service includes letter items and postal parcels of the weight and dimensions specified for universal service and items for the blind, not provided by the designated operator to offer universal service. Services falling within the scope of universal service do not include postal services consisting in clearance, sorting, transport, and delivery of courier items.

  15. 15.

    Economists have not yet been able to reach a broad consensus over the definition of an entry barrier, although I acknowledged the entry barrier as proposed by Fee, Preston, R., Hugo M. Mialon, and Michael A. Williams that “an economic barrier to entry is a cost that must be incurred by a new entrant and that incumbents do not or have not had to incur.”

  16. 16.

    Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ L 108 24.4.2002, p. 51). Similar regulation is in Art. 84 Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast), (OJ L 321, 17.12.2018, p. 36–214).

  17. 17.

    Act of 16 July 2004 Telecommunications Law, consolidated text Journal of Laws of 2018, item 1954, uniform text.

References

  • Bailly, D., & Meidinger, M. (2011). The dual tend towards operational efficiencies and social regulation in European postal service. In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Reinventing the postal sector in an electronic age. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowiec, L. (2017). Fundusz kompensacyjny jako metoda finansowania powszechnych usług pocztowych. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, LI(5), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chołodecki, M. (2019). Fundusz kompensacyjny na rynku telekomunikacyjnym i pocztowym. iKAR, 3(8), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chołodecki, M., & Popowska, B. (2018). Instrumenty prawne Prezesa UKE na rynku pocztowym. iKAR, 1(7), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (2000). Liberalization and the universal service obligation in postal service. In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Current directions in postal reform. Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (2008). Regulation and the USO under entry. In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Competition and regulation in the postal and delivery sector. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. (2011). State funding and cost sharing of the USO under the 2008 EU postal services directive. In M. Crew & P. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Reinventing the postal sector in an electronic age. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fee, P. R., Mialon, H. M., & Williams, M. A. (2004). What is a barrier to entry? American Economic Review, 94(2), 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratini, A. (2016). Compensation fund under EU law: A suitable solution for the postal market? In M. L. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The future of the postal sector in a digital world. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowsell, C. (2016). Origins of “universal service”. In M. L. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The future of the postal sector in a digital world. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snażyk, Z. (2015). Świadczenie pocztowej usługi powszechnej w warunkach liberalizacji rynku. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szydło, M. (2006). Usługa powszechna w telekomunikacji jako instytucja prawa Wspólnoty Europejskiej. Przegląd Sądowy, 16(5), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKE. (2018). Report on the state of the postal market in 2017https://uke.gov.pl/download/gfx/uke/en/defaultaktualnosci/36/96/1/report_on_the_state_of_the_postal_market_in_2017.pdf.

  • Visco-Comandini, V. (2018). Is the compensation fund an appropriate tool for financing universal postal service obligations? In P. Parcu, T. Brennan, & V. Glass (Eds.), New business and regulatory strategies in the postal sector. Topics in regulatory economics and policy. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mateusz Chołodecki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chołodecki, M. (2020). The Compensation Fund on the Postal Market: The Polish Case. In: Parcu, P.L., Brennan, T.J., Glass, V. (eds) The Changing Postal Environment. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34532-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics