Skip to main content

Exploring a Mixed Method Approach: Simulation Games and Q Methodology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11899))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2712 Accesses


In this paper we explore the possibilities to combine two research methods we regard as being very useful when interacting with stakeholders in complex systems. We discuss a mixed research methods approach, based on the Q methodology and a simulation game. In a game design process, translating the real or reference system into the game design is an intricate process and rather challenging due to the complexity of today’s societal systems. As shown by various studies, different data techniques are proposed in order to translate reality aspects. One of the proposed data gathering techniques in combination with simulation games is Q methodology. Q methodology is a suitable method to retrieve social perspectives of stakeholders on a particular topic. Yet it is still elusive how the results of a Q methodology can be used in a game design process. In this paper, we explore the possibilities how to combine the two methods and how to translate the results of the Q analysis into a game design concept. In the context of a case within the domain of transport and logistics, we discuss how such mixed research methods approach could look like. We conclude with a future outlook on our research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions


  1. Duke, R.D.: Gaming: The Future’s Language, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harteveld, C.: Triadic Game Design: Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play, 1st edn. Springer, London (2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kriz, W.C.: Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simul. Gaming 34(4), 495–511 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lukosch, H.K., Bekebrede, G., Kurapti, S., Lukosch, S.G.: A scientific foundation of simulation games for the analysis and design of complex systems. Simul. Gaming 49(3), 279–314 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters, V., Vissers, G., Heijne, G.: The validity of games. Simul. Gaming 29(2), 20–30 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Bruijn, H., Herder, P.M.: System and actors perspectives on sociotechnical systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 39(5), 981–992 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayer, I.S.: The research and evaluation of serious games: toward a comprehensive methodology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(3), 502–527 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuppen, E., Bosch-Rekveldt, M.G.C., Pikaar, E., Mehos, D.C.: Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: revealing perspectives using Q methodology. Int. J. Project Manage. 34(7), 1347–1359 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duke, R.D.: The game design process. In: Greenblat, C.S., Duke, R.D. (eds.) Gaming and Simulation: Rationale Design and Applications, pp. 99–168. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geurts, J.L.A., Duke, R.D., Vermeulen, P.A.M.: Policy gaming for strategy and change. Long Range Plan. 40(6), 535–558 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters, V., Van de Westelaken, M.: Spelsimulaties – een Beknopte Inleiding in het Ontwerpproces (Simulation Games – A Brief Introduction tot he Design Process), Nijmegen, The Netherlands (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Webler, T., Danielson, S., Tuler, S.: Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research, Greenfield, MA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, S.R.: Q methodology and qualitative research. Qual. Health Res. 6(4), 561–567 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ligtvoet, A., et al.: New future perspectives through constructive conflict: exploring the future of gas in the Netherlands. Futures 78–79, 19–33 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barry, J., Proops, J.: Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol. Econ. 28(3), 337–345 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nooteboom, B.: Collaboration, trust and the structure of relationships. In: Nooteboom, B., Stam, E. (eds.) Micro-Foundations for Innovation Policy, pp. 199–218. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis, J.D., Weigert, A.: Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces 63(4), 967–985 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mcknight, D.H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J.B., Clay, P.F.: Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Manage. Inform. Syst. 2(2), 1–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V.: Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9(2), 141–159 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B.B.: Trust in Relationships: A Model of Development and Decline, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiegmans, B., Menger, I., Behdani, B., van Arem, B.: Communication between deep sea container terminals and hinterland stakeholders: information needs and the relevance of information exchange. Marit. Econ. Logist. 20, 531–548 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anique Kuijpers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kuijpers, A., Lukosch, H., Verbraeck, A. (2019). Exploring a Mixed Method Approach: Simulation Games and Q Methodology. In: Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G., Gentile, M., Ninaus, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11899. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34350-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics